Ajit P Limaye1, Corinna La Rosa, Jeff Longmate, Don J Diamond. 1. 1 Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.2 Department of Experimental Therapeutics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.3 Division of Biostatistics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immune measurements that distinguish solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients who control cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection from those who progress to CMV-disease (CMV-dz) may be clinically useful in guiding tailored prevention strategies. We previously reported that elevated plasma levels of the immune-modulator IL-10 are associated with late CMV-dz. Here we evaluate whether IL-10 levels measured soon after prophylaxis discontinuation are predictive of CMV-dz risk. METHODS: Plasma IL-10 levels were quantitatively measured by ELISA kit in 40 D/R SOT patients. All 40 D/R high-risk patients were prospectively followed for at least 12 months post-SOT: 13 subjects developed CMV-dz, all within 6 months of prophylaxis discontinuation. RESULTS: IL-10 was detectable at the first post-prophylaxis measurement for 11 of 13 subjects who developed CMV-dz. In contrast, IL-10 was detectable in only 6 of 27 CMV asymptomatic patients. Monitoring IL-10 plasma levels within 1 month prophylaxis suspension appeared to have clinically useful level of 85% sensitivity and 78% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The exact role of IL-10 with its multiple immunoregulatory effects during CMV infection is not clear. Moreover, IL-10 production can be influenced by pathological and infectious contexts, and/or anti-rejection immunosuppressant therapy. Despite mechanisms of IL-10 dysregulation may substantially differ among SOT patients, our findings suggest that measurable plasma IL-10 soon after prophylaxis discontinuation may be an adequate indicator of subsequent CMV-dz. If a similar prognostic performance is confirmed in a larger D/R cohort, IL-10 plasma levels could be used to guide the length of prophylaxis, providing a clinically useful means to reduce the incidence of CMV-dz in high risk patients.
BACKGROUND: Immune measurements that distinguish solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients who control cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection from those who progress to CMV-disease (CMV-dz) may be clinically useful in guiding tailored prevention strategies. We previously reported that elevated plasma levels of the immune-modulator IL-10 are associated with late CMV-dz. Here we evaluate whether IL-10 levels measured soon after prophylaxis discontinuation are predictive of CMV-dz risk. METHODS: Plasma IL-10 levels were quantitatively measured by ELISA kit in 40 D/R SOT patients. All 40 D/R high-risk patients were prospectively followed for at least 12 months post-SOT: 13 subjects developed CMV-dz, all within 6 months of prophylaxis discontinuation. RESULTS:IL-10 was detectable at the first post-prophylaxis measurement for 11 of 13 subjects who developed CMV-dz. In contrast, IL-10 was detectable in only 6 of 27 CMV asymptomatic patients. Monitoring IL-10 plasma levels within 1 month prophylaxis suspension appeared to have clinically useful level of 85% sensitivity and 78% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The exact role of IL-10 with its multiple immunoregulatory effects during CMV infection is not clear. Moreover, IL-10 production can be influenced by pathological and infectious contexts, and/or anti-rejection immunosuppressant therapy. Despite mechanisms of IL-10 dysregulation may substantially differ among SOT patients, our findings suggest that measurable plasma IL-10 soon after prophylaxis discontinuation may be an adequate indicator of subsequent CMV-dz. If a similar prognostic performance is confirmed in a larger D/R cohort, IL-10 plasma levels could be used to guide the length of prophylaxis, providing a clinically useful means to reduce the incidence of CMV-dz in high risk patients.
Authors: Michael Boeckh; MeeiLi Huang; James Ferrenberg; Terry Stevens-Ayers; Laurence Stensland; W Garrett Nichols; Lawrence Corey Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: A Asberg; A G Jardine; A A Bignamini; H Rollag; M D Pescovitz; C C Gahlemann; A Humar; A Hartmann Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2010-05-10 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Albert J Eid; Robert A Brown; Supha K Arthurs; Brian D Lahr; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Timothy S Larson; Raymund R Razonable Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Elias A Said; Franck P Dupuy; Lydie Trautmann; Yuwei Zhang; Yu Shi; Mohamed El-Far; Brenna J Hill; Alessandra Noto; Petronela Ancuta; Yoav Peretz; Simone G Fonseca; Julien Van Grevenynghe; Mohamed R Boulassel; Julie Bruneau; Naglaa H Shoukry; Jean-Pierre Routy; Daniel C Douek; Elias K Haddad; Rafick-Pierre Sekaly Journal: Nat Med Date: 2010-03-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Juliet V Spencer; Kristen M Lockridge; Peter A Barry; Gaofeng Lin; Monica Tsang; Mark E T Penfold; Thomas J Schall Journal: J Virol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Benoît Vingert; Daniela Benati; Olivier Lambotte; Pierre de Truchis; Laurence Slama; Patricia Jeannin; Moran Galperin; Santiago Perez-Patrigeon; Faroudy Boufassa; William W Kwok; Fabrice Lemaître; Jean-François Delfraissy; Jacques Thèze; Lisa A Chakrabarti Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Alberto Talaya; Estela Giménez; Víctor Vinuesa; Ariadna Pérez; Paula Amat; José Luis Piñana; Eliseo Albert; Juan Carlos Hernández-Boluda; Carlos Solano; David Navarro Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 3.402