Liang Cheng1,2, Darrell D Davidson1, Mingsheng Wang1, Antonio Lopez-Beltran3,4,5, Rodolfo Montironi6, Lisha Wang7, Puay-Hoon Tan8, Gregory T MacLennan9, Sean R Williamson10, Shaobo Zhang1. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 2. Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Cordoba, Spain. 4. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cordoba, Spain. 5. Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal. 6. Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, School of Medicine, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona), United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy. 7. Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. 8. Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 9. Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 10. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To understand more clearly the genetic ontogeny of inverted papilloma of urinary bladder, we analysed telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation status in a group of 26 inverted papillomas in comparison with the mutation status of urothelial carcinoma with inverted growth (26 cases), conventional urothelial carcinoma (36 Ta non-invasive urothelial carcinoma, 35 T2 invasive urothelial carcinoma) and cystitis glandularis (25 cases). METHODS AND RESULTS: TERT promoter mutations in inverted papilloma, urothelial carcinoma with inverted growth, urothelial carcinoma and cystitis glandularis were found in 15% (four of 26), 58% (15 of 26), 63% (45 of 71) and 0% (none of 25), respectively. C228T mutations were the predominant mutations (97%) found in bladder tumours, while C250T aberrations occurred in approximately 3% of bladder tumours. In the inverted papilloma group, TERT mutation occurred predominantly in female patients (P = 0.006). Among urothelial carcinomas, TERT promoter mutation status did not correlate with gender, histological grade or pathological stage. CONCLUSIONS: TERT promoter mutations were found in 15% of inverted papillomas. Our data suggest that there is a subpopulation of inverted papilloma that shares a carcinogenetic pathway with urothelial carcinoma with inverted growth and conventional urothelial carcinomas. Caution is warranted in exploring TERT promoter mutation status as a screening or adjunct diagnostic test for bladder cancer.
AIMS: To understand more clearly the genetic ontogeny of inverted papilloma of urinary bladder, we analysed telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation status in a group of 26 inverted papillomas in comparison with the mutation status of urothelial carcinoma with inverted growth (26 cases), conventional urothelial carcinoma (36 Ta non-invasive urothelial carcinoma, 35 T2 invasive urothelial carcinoma) and cystitis glandularis (25 cases). METHODS AND RESULTS:TERT promoter mutations in inverted papilloma, urothelial carcinoma with inverted growth, urothelial carcinoma and cystitis glandularis were found in 15% (four of 26), 58% (15 of 26), 63% (45 of 71) and 0% (none of 25), respectively. C228T mutations were the predominant mutations (97%) found in bladder tumours, while C250T aberrations occurred in approximately 3% of bladder tumours. In the inverted papilloma group, TERT mutation occurred predominantly in female patients (P = 0.006). Among urothelial carcinomas, TERT promoter mutation status did not correlate with gender, histological grade or pathological stage. CONCLUSIONS:TERT promoter mutations were found in 15% of inverted papillomas. Our data suggest that there is a subpopulation of inverted papilloma that shares a carcinogenetic pathway with urothelial carcinoma with inverted growth and conventional urothelial carcinomas. Caution is warranted in exploring TERT promoter mutation status as a screening or adjunct diagnostic test for bladder cancer.
Authors: Sumit Isharwal; Wenhuo Hu; Judy Sarungbam; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Samson W Fine; Satish K Tickoo; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Sana Jadallah; Florence L Loo; Eugene J Pietzak; Eugene K Cha; Bernard H Bochner; Michael F Berger; Gopa Iyer; David B Solit; Victor E Reuter; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie Journal: J Pathol Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Johannes Giedl; Anja Rogler; Andreas Wild; Marc-Oliver Riener; Thomas Filbeck; Maximilian Burger; Petra Rümmele; Carolyn Hurst; Margaret Knowles; Arndt Hartmann; Ulrike Zinnall; Robert Stoehr Journal: J Cancer Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Alexander S Taylor; Brandon Newell; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Khaled S Hafez; Alon Z Weizer; Daniel E Spratt; Anne P Cameron; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Sounak Gupta; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Bryan L Betz; Noah Brown; Rohit Mehra Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-01-03
Authors: Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Edaise M da Silva; Sheila E Segura; Fresia Pareja; Rui Bi; Pier Selenica; Sarah H Kim; Lorenzo Ferrando; Mahsa Vahdatinia; Robert A Soslow; August Vidal; Sonia Gatius; Christopher G Przybycin; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Brian P Rubin; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Deborah F DeLair; Britta Weigelt Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 7.842