Literature DB >> 26678455

Comparison of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters across MR Imagers and Field Strengths: Evaluation in Upper Abdominal Organs.

Sebastiano Barbieri1, Olivio F Donati1, Johannes M Froehlich1, Harriet C Thoeny1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the reproducibility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters measured in upper abdominal organs with magnetic resonance (MR) imagers from different vendors and with different field strengths. Materials and Methods This prospective study was approved by the independent ethics committees of Kanton Bern and Kanton Zurich, and signed informed consent was obtained from all participants. Abdominal diffusion-weighted images in 10 healthy men (mean age, 37 years ± 8 [standard deviation]) were acquired by using 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imagers from three different vendors. Two readers independently delineated regions of interest that were used to measure IVIM parameters (diffusion coefficient [Dt], perfusion fraction [Fp], and pseudodiffusion coefficient [Dp]) in the left and right lobes of the liver, and in the pancreas, spleen, renal cortex, and renal medulla. Measurement reproducibility between readers was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Variability across MR imagers was analyzed by using between- and within-subject coefficients of variation (CVs) and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Between-reader reproducibility was high for Dt (ICC, 94.6%), intermediate for Fp (ICC, 81.7%), and low for Dp (ICC, 69.5%). Between- and within-subject CVs of Dt were relatively high (>20%) in the left lobe of the liver and relatively low (<10%) in the renal cortex and renal medulla. CVs generally exceeded 15% for Fp values and 20% for Dp. ANOVA indicated significant differences (P < .05) between MR imagers. Conclusion IVIM parameters in the upper abdomen may differ substantially across MR imagers. (©) RSNA, 2015 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26678455     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: Is there a correlation with flow and perfusion metrics obtained with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI?

Authors:  Stefanie J Hectors; Mathilde Wagner; Cecilia Besa; Octavia Bane; Hadrien A Dyvorne; M Isabel Fiel; Hongfa Zhu; Michael Donovan; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measurements: a prospective multicenter whole-body-MRI study.

Authors:  Nicolas F Michoux; Jakub W Ceranka; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Frank Peeters; Pierre Lu; Julie Absil; Perrine Triqueneaux; Yan Liu; Laurence Collette; Inneke Willekens; Carola Brussaard; Olivier Debeir; Stephan Hahn; Hubert Raeymaekers; Johan de Mey; Thierry Metens; Frédéric E Lecouvet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Liver intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive review of published data on normal values and applications for fibrosis and tumor evaluation.

Authors:  Yáo T Li; Jean-Pierre Cercueil; Jing Yuan; Weitian Chen; Romaric Loffroy; Yì Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-02

4.  Intravoxel incoherent motion: application in differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ma Luo; Ling Zhang; Xin Hua Jiang; Wei Dong Zhang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) 3 T MRI for orbital lesion characterization.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; Loïc Duron; Mathieu Zmuda; Kevin Zuber; Olivier Bergès; Marc Putterman; Julien Savatovsky; Laure Fournier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Monitoring Leiomyoma Response to Uterine Artery Embolization Using Diffusion and Perfusion Indices from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Mengqiu Cao; Lijun Qian; Xuebin Zhang; Xinjun Suo; Qing Lu; Huilin Zhao; Jialin Liu; Jianxun Qu; Yan Zhou; Jianrong Xu; Shiteng Suo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI during chemoradiation therapy to characterize and monitor treatment response in human papillomavirus head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ramesh Paudyal; Jung Hun Oh; Nadeem Riaz; Praveen Venigalla; Jingao Li; Vaios Hatzoglou; Jonathan Leeman; David Aramburu Nunez; Yonggang Lu; Joseph O Deasy; Nancy Lee; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Intra-voxel incoherent motion MRI of the living human foetus: technique and test-retest repeatability.

Authors:  András Jakab; Ruth Tuura; Raimund Kottke; Christian J Kellenberger; Ianina Scheer
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2017-12-22

9.  Reproducibility of intravoxel incoherent motion of liver on a 3.0T scanner: free-breathing and respiratory-triggered sequences acquired with different numbers of excitations.

Authors:  Andrzej Cieszanowski; Katarzyna Pasicz; Joanna Podgórska; Ewa Fabiszewska; Witold Skrzyński; Jakub Jasieniak; Agnieszka Anysz-Grodzicka; Iwona Grabska; Jakub Pałucki; Martyna Naduk-Ostrowska; Beata Jagielska; Paweł Kukołowicz
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-17

10.  Repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters at 3.0 Tesla in orbital lesions.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; Julien Savatovsky; Daniel Balvay; Mathieu Zmuda; Jean-Claude Sadik; Olivier Galatoire; Frédérique Charbonneau; Olivier Bergès; Hervé Picard; Laure Fournier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.