Literature DB >> 26678026

A taxonomy of estimands for regulatory clinical trials with discontinuations.

Thomas Permutt1.   

Abstract

The National Research Council Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials recommended that protocols for clinical trials 'explicitly define... causal estimands of primary interest'. In discussions with sponsors of clinical trials since the publication of the National Research Council report, the expression causal estimands has been the subject of confusion. It may not be entirely clear what the National Research Council panel meant, and in any case, it has not been clear how this recommendation might be put in practice. This paper's purpose is to say how the working group understands it and how we think it should be put in practice. We classify possible choices of estimand according to their usefulness for regulatory purposes in various clinical settings. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Keywords:  benefit and risk; causal inference; missing data

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26678026     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

Review 1.  Essential statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Scott R Evans; Omar Mbowe; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

2.  A likely responder approach for the analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Eugene Laska; Carole Siegel; Ziqiang Lin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Estimands and missing data in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: advances in design and analysis.

Authors:  Xueya Cai; Jennifer S Gewandter; Hua He; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials?

Authors:  Thomas R Sullivan; Ian R White; Amy B Salter; Philip Ryan; Katherine J Lee
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 5.  Incorporating and interpreting regulatory guidance on estimands in diabetes clinical trials: The PIONEER 1 randomized clinical trial as an example.

Authors:  Vanita R Aroda; Trine Saugstrup; John B Buse; Morten Donsmark; Jeppe Zacho; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 6.  Estimands: bringing clarity and focus to research questions in clinical trials.

Authors:  Timothy Peter Clark; Brennan C Kahan; Alan Phillips; Ian White; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Estimation of treatment effects in short-term depression studies. An evaluation based on the ICH E9(R1) estimands framework.

Authors:  Marian Mitroiu; Steven Teerenstra; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Frank Pétavy; Kit C B Roes
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 1.234

8.  A causal modelling framework for reference-based imputation and tipping point analysis in clinical trials with quantitative outcome.

Authors:  Ian R White; Royes Joseph; Nicky Best
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.051

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.