Literature DB >> 26677837

A regulatory perspective on missing data in the aftermath of the NRC report.

Lisa M LaVange1, Thomas Permutt1.   

Abstract

The issuance of a report in 2010 by the National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences entitled 'The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials,' commissioned by the US Food and Drug Administration, had an immediate impact on the way that statisticians and clinical researchers in both industry and regulatory agencies think about the missing data problem. We believe that there is currently great potential to improve study quality and interpretability-by reducing the amount of missing data through changes in trial design and conduct and by planning and conducting analyses that better account for the missing information. Here, we describe our view on some of the recommendations in the report and suggest ways in which these recommendations can be incorporated into new or ongoing clinical trials in order to improve their chance of success. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Keywords:  clinical trials: design; conduct; drug regulation; missing data

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26677837     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

Review 1.  Essential statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Scott R Evans; Omar Mbowe; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

2.  Longitudinal changes in the quality of life of oral cancer patients during the perioperative period.

Authors:  Takayuki Aoki; Yoshihide Ota; Takatsugu Suzuki; Yuya Denda; Ken-Ichi Aoyama; Takeshi Akiba; Mariko Naito; Toshihiro Arai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.

Authors:  Lysbeth Floden; Melanie L Bell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  Incorporating and interpreting regulatory guidance on estimands in diabetes clinical trials: The PIONEER 1 randomized clinical trial as an example.

Authors:  Vanita R Aroda; Trine Saugstrup; John B Buse; Morten Donsmark; Jeppe Zacho; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 6.577

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.