Literature DB >> 2667749

Prognostic factors influencing cisplatin-induced emesis. Definition and validation of a predictive logistic model.

C F Pollera1, D Giannarelli.   

Abstract

Data obtained from 209 patients who entered different prospective randomized antiemetic trials were analyzed to establish the prognostic value of some variables on the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. The antiemetic regimens evaluated included the following: metoclopramide (M) at 1, 2, and 4 mg/kg total dose and a combination of M (4 mg/kg) with dexamethasone (D) (40 mg). Vomiting lasting more than 1 hour (no protection [NP]) was the endpoint selected for the analysis. A logistic model carried out, first on the 110 subjects receiving the M + D regimen and then on the whole sample, selected sex (P = 0.0001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) (P = 0.006), and age (P = 0.01) among the six factors considered. Since the prognostic value of these variables is mostly related to their interaction, three major risk classes were identified. The corresponding NP rates were 26.3%, 42.4%, and 70.8% for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively (P = 0.000002). Except for the lowest M level, the observed NP rates were significantly associated to the risk classes, whereas the antiemetic regimen influenced the antiemetic outcome only in the low-risk class. Regardless of the regimen employed, certain patient characteristics, such as sex, PS, and age, significantly affect cisplatin-related emesis and should be carefully considered in planning further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2667749     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890901)64:5<1117::aid-cncr2820640525>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

1.  Impact on daily functioning and indirect/direct costs associated with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in a U.S. population.

Authors:  Amin Haiderali; Laura Menditto; Margaret Good; April Teitelbaum; Jessica Wegner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Antiemetic study design: desirable objectives, stratifications and analyses.

Authors:  I N Olver
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

Review 3.  Myths and realities of antiemetic treatment.

Authors:  M Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

Review 4.  Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: pathophysiology and therapeutic principles.

Authors:  Juan Bayo; Paula J Fonseca; Susana Hernando; S Servitja; A Calvo; S Falagan; Estefanía García; Iria González; María José de Miguel; Quionia Pérez; Ana Milena; Antonio Ruiz; Agustí Barnadas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Interaction between serotonin reuptake inhibitors, 5-HT3 antagonists, and NK1 antagonists in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Olivier Mir; Jean-Philippe Durand; Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette; Julie Giroux; Romain Coriat; Anatole Cessot; Stanislas Ropert; François Goldwasser; Raphaël Gaillard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Age and gender differences in symptom intensity and symptom clusters among patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Winson Y Cheung; Lisa W Le; Lucia Gagliese; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  A prospective, observational, multicenter study on risk factors and prophylaxis for low emetic risk chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Toshinobu Hayashi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Takanori Miyoshi; Yoko Toriyama; Chiaki Yokota; Jun Taniguchi; Kiyonori Hanada; Kyouichi Tsumagari; Noriko Okubo; Yoshimichi Koutake; Kohei Sakata; Yosei Kawamata; Takashi Goto; Yasufumi Tsurusaki; Makiko Koyabu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Cost-utility analysis of aprepitant for patients who truly need it in Japan.

Authors:  Ikuto Tsukiyama; Masahiko Ando; Sumiyo Tsukiyama; Masayuki Takeuchi; Masayuki Ejiri; Yusuke Kurose; Hiroko Saito; Ichiro Arakawa; Tadao Inoue; Etsuro Yamaguchi; Akihito Kubo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Influence of ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms on the antiemetic efficacy in patients with cancer receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a TRIPLE pharmacogenomics study.

Authors:  D Tsuji; M Yokoi; K Suzuki; T Daimon; M Nakao; H Ayuhara; Y Kogure; K Shibata; T Hayashi; K Hirai; K Inoue; T Hama; K Takeda; M Nishio; K Itoh
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  Inconsistency of prognostic factors for post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  J Pater; L Slamet; B Zee; D Osoba; D Warr; J Rusthoven
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.