Literature DB >> 26676643

Naïve Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Generated From β-Thalassemia Fibroblasts Allow Efficient Gene Correction With CRISPR/Cas9.

Yuanyuan Yang1, Xiaobai Zhang1, Li Yi1, Zhenzhen Hou1, Jiayu Chen1, Xiaochen Kou1, Yanhong Zhao1, Hong Wang1, Xiao-Fang Sun2, Cizhong Jiang1, Yixuan Wang3, Shaorong Gao3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Conventional primed human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) exhibit molecular and biological characteristics distinct from pluripotent stem cells in the naïve state. Although naïve pluripotent stem cells show much higher levels of self-renewal ability and multidifferentiation capacity, it is unknown whether naïve iPSCs can be generated directly from patient somatic cells and will be superior to primed iPSCs. In the present study, we used an established 5i/L/FA system to directly reprogram fibroblasts of a patient with β-thalassemia into transgene-free naïve iPSCs with molecular signatures of ground-state pluripotency. Furthermore, these naïve iPSCs can efficiently produce cross-species chimeras. Importantly, using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 nuclease genome editing system, these naïve iPSCs exhibit significantly improved gene-correction efficiencies compared with the corresponding primed iPSCs. Furthermore, human naïve iPSCs could be directly generated from noninvasively collected urinary cells, which are easily acquired and thus represent an excellent cell resource for further clinical trials. Therefore, our findings demonstrate the feasibility and superiority of using patient-specific iPSCs in the naïve state for disease modeling, gene editing, and future clinical therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: In the present study, transgene-free naïve induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) directly converted from the fibroblasts of a patient with β-thalassemia in a defined culture system were generated. These naïve iPSCs, which show ground-state pluripotency, exhibited significantly improved single-cell cloning ability, recovery capacity, and gene-targeting efficiency compared with conventional primed iPSCs. These results provide an improved strategy for personalized treatment of genetic diseases such as β-thalassemia. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; Gene correction; Naïve state; Reprogramming; β-Thalassemia patient

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26676643      PMCID: PMC4704878          DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med        ISSN: 2157-6564            Impact factor:   6.940


  27 in total

1.  Clonally derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture.

Authors:  M Amit; M K Carpenter; M S Inokuma; C P Chiu; C P Harris; M A Waknitz; J Itskovitz-Eldor; J A Thomson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Derivation of embryonic stem-cell lines from human blastocysts.

Authors:  Chad A Cowan; Irina Klimanskaya; Jill McMahon; Jocelyn Atienza; Jeannine Witmyer; Jacob P Zucker; Shunping Wang; Cynthia C Morton; Andrew P McMahon; Doug Powers; Douglas A Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  A Bradley; M Evans; M H Kaufman; E Robertson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 May 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells.

Authors:  Junying Yu; Maxim A Vodyanik; Kim Smuga-Otto; Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget; Jennifer L Frane; Shulan Tian; Jeff Nie; Gudrun A Jonsdottir; Victor Ruotti; Ron Stewart; Igor I Slukvin; James A Thomson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Paul J Tesar; Josh G Chenoweth; Frances A Brook; Timothy J Davies; Edward P Evans; David L Mack; Richard L Gardner; Ronald D G McKay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Takahashi; Koji Tanabe; Mari Ohnuki; Megumi Narita; Tomoko Ichisaka; Kiichiro Tomoda; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Derivation of a diploid human embryonic stem cell line from a mononuclear zygote.

Authors:  Edith Suss-Toby; S Gerecht-Nir; M Amit; D Manor; J Itskovitz-Eldor
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Seamless correction of the sickle cell disease mutation of the HBB gene in human induced pluripotent stem cells using TALENs.

Authors:  Ning Sun; Huimin Zhao
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Qi-Long Ying; Jason Wray; Jennifer Nichols; Laura Batlle-Morera; Bradley Doble; James Woodgett; Philip Cohen; Austin Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos.

Authors:  I Gabrielle M Brons; Lucy E Smithers; Matthew W B Trotter; Peter Rugg-Gunn; Bowen Sun; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Sarah K Howlett; Amanda Clarkson; Lars Ahrlund-Richter; Roger A Pedersen; Ludovic Vallier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  CRISP Points on Establishing CRISPR-Cas9 In Vitro Culture Experiments in a Resource Constraint Haematology Oncology Research Lab.

Authors:  Jhumki Das; Prateek Bhatia; Aditya Singh
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based gene correction in induced pluripotent stem cells established from fibroblasts of patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Masahiro Sato; Issei Saitoh; Emi Inada
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2016-11-14

3.  Ground state naïve pluripotent stem cells and CRISPR/Cas9 gene correction for β-thalassemia.

Authors:  Alessia Finotti; Monica Borgatti; Roberto Gambari
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond.

Authors:  Rodolphe Barrangou; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Mechanisms of gene regulation in human embryos and pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Thorold W Theunissen; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Cell fate roadmap of human primed-to-naive transition reveals preimplantation cell lineage signatures.

Authors:  Yan Bi; Zhifen Tu; Jianfeng Zhou; Xuehao Zhu; Hong Wang; Shaorong Gao; Yixuan Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  CRISPR Guide RNA Library Screens in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Qiang Fu; Huijun Shi; Guangqian Zhou
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 8.  CRISPR-Cas9 technology and its application in haematological disorders.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Nami McCarty
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 9.  Gene Editing and Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Tools for Advancing Diabetes Disease Modeling and Beta-Cell Development.

Authors:  Katelyn Millette; Senta Georgia
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 10.  Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 to treat hereditary hematological disorders.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Ruiting Wen; Zhigang Yang; Zhanghui Chen
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.