Literature DB >> 25230102

The use of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in spontaneously breathing patients to assess dynamic arterial elastance and to predict arterial pressure response to fluid administration.

Maurizio Cecconi1, M Ignacio Monge García, Manuel Gracia Romero, Johannes Mellinghoff, Francesca Caliandro, Robert Michael Grounds, Andrew Rhodes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn), defined as the pulse pressure variation (PPV) to stroke volume variation (SVV) ratio, has been suggested as a predictor of the arterial pressure response to fluid administration. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of Eadyn to predict the arterial blood pressure response to a fluid challenge (FC) in preload-dependent, spontaneously breathing patients.
METHODS: Patients admitted postoperatively and monitored with the Nexfin monitor (BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) were enrolled in the study. Patients were included in the analysis if they were spontaneously breathing and had an increase in cardiac output ≥10% during an FC. Patients were classified according to the increase in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) after FC into MAP-responders (MAP increase ≥10%) and MAP-nonresponders (MAP increase <10%). Eadyn was continuously calculated from the PPV and SVV values obtained from the monitor.
RESULTS: Thirty-four FCs from 26 patients were studied. Seventeen FCs (50%) induced a positive MAP response. Preinfusion Eadyn was significantly higher in MAP-responders (1.39 ± 0.41 vs 0.85 ± 0.23; P = 0.0001). Preinfusion Eadyn predicted a positive MAP response to FC with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.92 ± 0.04 of standard error (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.99; P < 0.0001). A preinfusion Eadyn value ≥1.06 (gray zone: 0.9-1.15) discriminated MAP-responders with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% (approximate 95% confidence interval, 64%-99%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive Eadyn, defined as the PPV to SVV ratio, predicted the arterial blood pressure increase to fluid administration in spontaneously breathing, preload-dependent patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25230102     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  21 in total

1.  Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients.

Authors:  Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Pedro Guijo González; Manuel Gracia Romero; Anselmo Gil Cano; Chris Oscier; Andrew Rhodes; Robert Michael Grounds; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Predicting vasopressor needs using dynamic parameters.

Authors:  M Ignacio Monge García; Michael R Pinsky; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Monitoring dynamic arterial elastance as a means of decreasing the duration of norepinephrine treatment in vasoplegic syndrome following cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Pierre-Grégoire Guinot; Osama Abou-Arab; Mathieu Guilbart; Stéphane Bar; Elie Zogheib; Mona Daher; Patricia Besserve; Joseph Nader; Thierry Caus; Said Kamel; Hervé Dupont; Emmanuel Lorne
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Lorenzo Calabrò; Luca Pugliese; Aulona Lulja; Alexandra Sopuch; Daniela Rosalba; Emanuela Morenghi; Glenn Hernandez; Xavier Monnet; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 5.  Assessment of volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department: a systematic approach.

Authors:  C Maurer; J Y Wagner; R M Schmid; B Saugel
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  Dynamic arterial elastance predicts mean arterial pressure decrease associated with decreasing norepinephrine dosage in septic shock.

Authors:  Pierre-Grégoire Guinot; Eugénie Bernard; Mélanie Levrard; Hervé Dupont; Emmanuel Lorne
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Christoph Hofer; Jean-Louis Teboul; Ville Pettila; Erika Wilkman; Zsolt Molnar; Giorgio Della Rocca; Cesar Aldecoa; Antonio Artigas; Sameer Jog; Michael Sander; Claudia Spies; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  A novel particle filtering method for estimation of pulse pressure variation during spontaneous breathing.

Authors:  Sunghan Kim; Fouzia Noor; Mateo Aboy; James McNames
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Dynamic Arterial Elastance in Predicting Arterial Pressure Increase After Fluid Challenge During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Hyungseok Seo; Yu-Gyeong Kong; Seok-Joon Jin; Ji-Hyun Chin; Hee-Yeong Kim; Yoon-Kyung Lee; Jai-Hyun Hwang; Young-Kug Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Can a central blood volume deficit be detected by systolic pressure variation during spontaneous breathing?

Authors:  Michael Dahl; Chris Hayes; Bodil Steen Rasmussen; Anders Larsson; Niels H Secher
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.