Literature DB >> 26675626

Zero-Inflated Beta Regression for Differential Abundance Analysis with Metagenomics Data.

Xiaoling Peng1, Gang Li2, Zhenqiu Liu3.   

Abstract

Metagenomics data have been growing rapidly due to the advances in NGS technologies. One goal of human microbial studies is to detect abundance differences across clinical conditions. Besides small sample size and high dimension, metagenomics data are usually represented as compositions (proportions) with a large number of zeros and skewed distribution. Efficient tools for handling such compositional data need to be developed. We propose a zero-inflated beta regression approach (ZIBSeq) for identifying differentially abundant features between multiple clinical conditions. The proposed method takes the sparse nature of metagenomics data into account and handle the compositional data efficiently. Compared with other available methods, the proposed approach demonstrates better performance with large AUC values for most simulation studies. When applied to a human metagenomics data, it also identifies biologically important taxa reported from previous studies. The software in R is available upon request from the first author.

Entities:  

Keywords:  algorithms; graphs and networks; machine learning; metagenomics; statistical models

Year:  2015        PMID: 26675626      PMCID: PMC6109378          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2015.0157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  19 in total

1.  Normalization, testing, and false discovery rate estimation for RNA-sequencing data.

Authors:  Jun Li; Daniela M Witten; Iain M Johnstone; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  The future of microbial metagenomics (or is ignorance bliss?).

Authors:  Jack A Gilbert; Folker Meyer; Mark J Bailey
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 3.  Simultaneous and selective inference: Current successes and future challenges.

Authors:  Yoav Benjamini
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R.

Authors:  Tobias Sing; Oliver Sander; Niko Beerenwinkel; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Ali Mortazavi; Brian A Williams; Kenneth McCue; Lorian Schaeffer; Barbara Wold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment.

Authors:  Xochitl C Morgan; Timothy L Tickle; Harry Sokol; Dirk Gevers; Kathryn L Devaney; Doyle V Ward; Joshua A Reyes; Samir A Shah; Neal LeLeiko; Scott B Snapper; Athos Bousvaros; Joshua Korzenik; Bruce E Sands; Ramnik J Xavier; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  DNACLUST: accurate and efficient clustering of phylogenetic marker genes.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Ghodsi; Bo Liu; Mihai Pop
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between obese and non-obese individuals in a Japanese population, as analyzed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Chika Kasai; Kazushi Sugimoto; Isao Moritani; Junichiro Tanaka; Yumi Oya; Hidekazu Inoue; Masahiko Tameda; Katsuya Shiraki; Masaaki Ito; Yoshiyuki Takei; Kojiro Takase
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  18 in total

1.  A Bayesian framework for identifying consistent patterns of microbial abundance between body sites.

Authors:  Richard Meier; Jeffrey A Thompson; Mei Chung; Naisi Zhao; Karl T Kelsey; Dominique S Michaud; Devin C Koestler
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2019-11-08

2.  The Supragingival Biofilm in Early Childhood Caries: Clinical and Laboratory Protocols and Bioinformatics Pipelines Supporting Metagenomics, Metatranscriptomics, and Metabolomics Studies of the Oral Microbiome.

Authors:  Kimon Divaris; Dmitry Shungin; Adaris Rodríguez-Cortés; Patricia V Basta; Jeff Roach; Hunyong Cho; Di Wu; Andrea G Ferreira Zandoná; Jeannie Ginnis; Sivapriya Ramamoorthy; Jason M Kinchen; Jakub Kwintkiewicz; Natasha Butz; Apoena A Ribeiro; M Andrea Azcarate-Peril
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

3.  A two-part mixed-effects model for analyzing longitudinal microbiome compositional data.

Authors:  Eric Z Chen; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Super-taxon in human microbiome are identified to be associated with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wei Dai; Cai Li; Ting Li; Jianchang Hu; Heping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  MODELING MICROBIAL ABUNDANCES AND DYSBIOSIS WITH BETA-BINOMIAL REGRESSION.

Authors:  Bryan D Martin; Daniela Witten; Amy D Willis
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Joint modeling of zero-inflated longitudinal proportions and time-to-event data with application to a gut microbiome study.

Authors:  Jiyuan Hu; Chan Wang; Martin J Blaser; Huilin Li
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Negative binomial mixed models for analyzing microbiome count data.

Authors:  Xinyan Zhang; Himel Mallick; Zaixiang Tang; Lei Zhang; Xiangqin Cui; Andrew K Benson; Nengjun Yi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  mbImpute: an accurate and robust imputation method for microbiome data.

Authors:  Ruochen Jiang; Wei Vivian Li; Jingyi Jessica Li
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  The Association Between Smoking and Gut Microbiome in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Rachel Nolan-Kenney; Fen Wu; Jiyuan Hu; Liying Yang; Dervla Kelly; Huilin Li; Farzana Jasmine; Muhammad G Kibriya; Faruque Parvez; Ishrat Shaheen; Golam Sarwar; Alauddin Ahmed; Mahbub Eunus; Tariqul Islam; Zhiheng Pei; Habibul Ahsan; Yu Chen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.825

10.  An adaptive association test for microbiome data.

Authors:  Chong Wu; Jun Chen; Junghi Kim; Wei Pan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.