Rachel Nolan-Kenney1,2, Fen Wu1,2, Jiyuan Hu1,2, Liying Yang3,4,5, Dervla Kelly6, Huilin Li1,2, Farzana Jasmine7, Muhammad G Kibriya7, Faruque Parvez8, Ishrat Shaheen9, Golam Sarwar9, Alauddin Ahmed9, Mahbub Eunus9, Tariqul Islam10, Zhiheng Pei3,4,5, Habibul Ahsan7, Yu Chen1,2. 1. Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. 2. Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. 3. Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. 4. Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. 5. The Department of Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY. 6. Health Research Institute, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. 7. Department of Public Health Sciences, Institute for Population and Precision Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 8. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. 9. Department of Informatics, U-Chicago Research Bangladesh, Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh. 10. Department of Health, Research & Training, U-Chicago Research Bangladesh, Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological studies that investigate alterations in the gut microbial composition associated with smoking are lacking. This study examined the composition of the gut microbiome in smokers compared with nonsmokers. AIMS AND METHODS: Stool samples were collected in a cross-sectional study of 249 participants selected from the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study in Bangladesh. Microbial DNA was extracted from the fecal samples and sequenced by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The associations of smoking status and intensity of smoking with the relative abundance or the absence and presence of individual bacterial taxon from phylum to genus levels were examined. RESULTS: The relative abundance of bacterial taxa along the Erysipelotrichi-to-Catenibacterium lineage was significantly higher in current smokers compared to never-smokers. The odds ratio comparing the mean relative abundance in current smokers with that in never-smokers was 1.91 (95% confidence interval = 1.36-2.69) for the genus Catenibacterium and 1.89 (95% confidence interval = 1.39-2.56) for the family Erysipelotrichaceae, the order Erysipelotrichale, and the class Erysipelotrichi (false discovery rate-adjusted p values = .0008-.01). A dose-response association was observed for each of these bacterial taxa. The presence of Alphaproteobacteria was significantly greater comparing current with never-smokers (odds ratio = 4.85, false discovery rate-adjusted p values = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data in a Bangladeshi population are consistent with evidence of an association between smoking status and dosage with change in the gut bacterial composition. IMPLICATIONS: This study for the first time examined the relationship between smoking and the gut microbiome composition. The data suggest that smoking status may play an important role in the composition of the gut microbiome, especially among individuals with higher levels of tobacco exposure.
INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological studies that investigate alterations in the gut microbial composition associated with smoking are lacking. This study examined the composition of the gut microbiome in smokers compared with nonsmokers. AIMS AND METHODS: Stool samples were collected in a cross-sectional study of 249 participants selected from the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study in Bangladesh. Microbial DNA was extracted from the fecal samples and sequenced by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The associations of smoking status and intensity of smoking with the relative abundance or the absence and presence of individual bacterial taxon from phylum to genus levels were examined. RESULTS: The relative abundance of bacterial taxa along the Erysipelotrichi-to-Catenibacterium lineage was significantly higher in current smokers compared to never-smokers. The odds ratio comparing the mean relative abundance in current smokers with that in never-smokers was 1.91 (95% confidence interval = 1.36-2.69) for the genus Catenibacterium and 1.89 (95% confidence interval = 1.39-2.56) for the family Erysipelotrichaceae, the order Erysipelotrichale, and the class Erysipelotrichi (false discovery rate-adjusted p values = .0008-.01). A dose-response association was observed for each of these bacterial taxa. The presence of Alphaproteobacteria was significantly greater comparing current with never-smokers (odds ratio = 4.85, false discovery rate-adjusted p values = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data in a Bangladeshi population are consistent with evidence of an association between smoking status and dosage with change in the gut bacterial composition. IMPLICATIONS: This study for the first time examined the relationship between smoking and the gut microbiome composition. The data suggest that smoking status may play an important role in the composition of the gut microbiome, especially among individuals with higher levels of tobacco exposure.
Authors: Jane L Benjamin; Charlotte R H Hedin; Andreas Koutsoumpas; Siew C Ng; Neil E McCarthy; Natalie J Prescott; Pedro Pessoa-Lopes; Christopher G Mathew; Jeremy Sanderson; Ailsa L Hart; Michael A Kamm; Stella C Knight; Alastair Forbes; Andrew J Stagg; James O Lindsay; Kevin Whelan Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Duy M Dinh; Gretchen E Volpe; Chad Duffalo; Seema Bhalchandra; Albert K Tai; Anne V Kane; Christine A Wanke; Honorine D Ward Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Gyu-Sung Cho; Felix Ritzmann; Marie Eckstein; Melanie Huch; Karlis Briviba; Diana Behsnilian; Horst Neve; Charles M A P Franz Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Jorrit L Opstelten; Jonathan Plassais; Saskia W C van Mil; Emna Achouri; Matthieu Pichaud; Peter D Siersema; Bas Oldenburg; Alessandra C L Cervino Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Martina Antinozzi; Monica Giffi; Nicolò Sini; Francesca Gallè; Federica Valeriani; Corrado De Vito; Giorgio Liguori; Vincenzo Romano Spica; Maria Sofia Cattaruzza Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-02-21
Authors: Anna K Whitehead; Margaret C Meyers; Christopher M Taylor; Meng Luo; Scot E Dowd; Xinping Yue; Lauri O Byerley Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: Jason E Martinez; Doron D Kahana; Simran Ghuman; Haley P Wilson; Julian Wilson; Samuel C J Kim; Venu Lagishetty; Jonathan P Jacobs; Amiya P Sinha-Hikim; Theodore C Friedman Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 5.555