Literature DB >> 26674876

Neural Estimates of Imagined Outcomes in Basolateral Amygdala Depend on Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Federica Lucantonio1, Matthew P H Gardner2, Aaron Mirenzi2, Laura E Newman2, Yuji K Takahashi2, Geoffrey Schoenbaum3.   

Abstract

Reciprocal connections between the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) provide a critical circuit for guiding normal behavior when information about expected outcomes is required. Recently, we reported that outcome signaling by OFC neurons is also necessary for learning in the face of unexpected outcomes during a Pavlovian over-expectation task. Key to learning in this task is the ability to build on prior learning to infer or estimate an amount of reward never previously received. OFC was critical to this process. Notably, in parallel work, we found that BLA was not necessary for learning in this setting. This suggested a dissociation in which the BLA might be critical for acquiring information about the outcomes but not for subsequently using it to make novel predictions. Here we evaluated this hypothesis by recording single-unit activity from BLA in rats during the same Pavlovian over-expectation task used previously. We found that spiking activity recorded in BLA in control rats did reflect novel outcome estimates derived from the integration of prior learning, however consistent with a model in which this process occurs in the OFC, these correlates were entirely abolished by ipsilateral OFC lesions. These data indicate that this information about these novel predictions is represented in the BLA, supported via direct or indirect input from the OFC, even though it does not appear to be necessary for learning. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) are involved in behavior that depends on knowledge of impending outcomes. Recently, we found that only the OFC was necessary for using such information for learning in a Pavlovian over-expectation task. The current experiment was designed to search for neural correlates of this process in the BLA and, if present, to ask whether they would still be dependent on OFC input. We found that although spiking activity in BLA in control rats did reflect the novel outcome estimates underlying learning, these correlates were entirely abolished by OFC lesions.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3516521-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amygdala; extinction; orbitofrontal; over-expectation; rat; single-unit

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26674876      PMCID: PMC4679829          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3126-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  Spontaneous recovery from overexpectation.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Dissociation of attention in learning and action: effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus, medial prefrontal cortex, and posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Maddux; Erin C Kerfoot; Souvik Chatterjee; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Renewal after overexpectation.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination.

Authors:  R R BUSH; F MOSTELLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Differential involvement of the basolateral amygdala and mediodorsal thalamus in instrumental action selection.

Authors:  Sean B Ostlund; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Orbitofrontal lesions impair use of cue-outcome associations in a devaluation task.

Authors:  Charles L Pickens; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  GABAA-mediated inhibition of basolateral amygdala blocks reward devaluation in macaques.

Authors:  Laurie L Wellman; Karen Gale; Ludise Malkova
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The effects of selective amygdala, orbital frontal cortex or hippocampal formation lesions on reward assessment in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Christopher J Machado; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Contributions of the amygdala to reward expectancy and choice signals in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Alan N Hampton; Ralph Adolphs; Michael J Tyszka; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  The basolateral amygdala is critical to the expression of pavlovian and instrumental outcome-specific reinforcer devaluation effects.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  16 in total

1.  Basolateral Amygdala to Orbitofrontal Cortex Projections Enable Cue-Triggered Reward Expectations.

Authors:  Nina T Lichtenberg; Zachary T Pennington; Sandra M Holley; Venuz Y Greenfield; Carlos Cepeda; Michael S Levine; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Attenuating Neural Threat Expression with Imagination.

Authors:  Marianne Cumella Reddan; Tor Dessart Wager; Daniela Schiller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex, but not dorsal hippocampus, are necessary for the control of reward-seeking by occasion setters.

Authors:  Kurt M Fraser; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 4.415

4.  A molecularly integrated amygdalo-fronto-striatal network coordinates flexible learning and memory.

Authors:  Dan C Li; Niharika M Dighe; Britton R Barbee; Elizabeth G Pitts; Brik Kochoian; Sarah A Blumenthal; Janet Figueroa; Traci Leong; Shannon L Gourley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 28.771

Review 5.  Back to basics: Making predictions in the orbitofrontal-amygdala circuit.

Authors:  Melissa J Sharpe; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Inhibitory modulation of medial prefrontal cortical activation on lateral orbitofrontal cortex-amygdala information flow.

Authors:  Chun-Hui Chang; Ta-Wen Ho
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Adaptive learning under expected and unexpected uncertainty.

Authors:  Alireza Soltani; Alicia Izquierdo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Choose your path: Divergent basolateral amygdala efferents differentially mediate incentive motivation, flexibility and decision-making.

Authors:  Sara E Keefer; Utsav Gyawali; Donna J Calu
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Neural correlates of two different types of extinction learning in the amygdala central nucleus.

Authors:  Mihaela D Iordanova; Mickael L D Deroche; Guillem R Esber; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A bidirectional corticoamygdala circuit for the encoding and retrieval of detailed reward memories.

Authors:  Ana C Sias; Ashleigh K Morse; Sherry Wang; Venuz Y Greenfield; Caitlin M Goodpaster; Tyler M Wrenn; Andrew M Wikenheiser; Sandra M Holley; Carlos Cepeda; Michael S Levine; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.