Literature DB >> 26674843

Prehospital Spinal Immobilization: Effect of Effort on Kinematics of Voluntary Head-neck Motion Assessed using Accelerometry.

Rob Pryce1, Neil McDonald2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Standards for immobilizing potentially spine-injured patients in the prehospital environment are evolving. Current guidelines call for more research into treatment practices. Available research into spinal immobilization (SI) reveals a number of limitations. PROBLEM: There are currently few techniques for measuring head and neck motion that address identified limitations and can be adapted to clinically relevant scenarios. This study investigates one possible method.
METHODS: Study participants were fitted with miniaturized accelerometers to record head motion. Participants were exposed to three levels of restraint: none, cervical-collar only, and full immobilization. In each condition, participants were instructed to move in single planes, with multiple iterations at each of four levels of effort. Participants were also instructed to move continuously in multiple planes, with iterations at each of three levels of simulated patient movement. Peak and average displacement and acceleration were calculated for each immobilization condition and level of effort. Comparisons were made with video-based measurement. Participant characteristics also were tracked.
RESULTS: Acceleration and displacement of the head increased with effort and decreased with more restraint. In some conditions, participants generated measurable acceleration with minimal displacement. Continuous, multi-dimensional motions produced greater displacement and acceleration than single-plane motions under similar conditions.
CONCLUSION: Study results suggest a number of findings: acceleration complements displacement as a measure of motion in potentially spine-injured patients; participant effort has an effect on outcome measures; and continuous, multi-dimensional motion can produce results that differ from single-plane motions. Miniaturized accelerometers are a promising technology for future research to investigate these findings in realistic, clinically relevant scenarios.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AO atlanto-occipital; EMS Emergency Medical Services; Emergency Medical Services; IMU inertial measurement unit; RMS root mean square; SI spinal immobilization; accelerometer; cervical range of motion; immobilization; spinal injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26674843     DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X1500552X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  4 in total

1.  Evaluating a novel, low-cost technique for cervical-spine immobilization for application in resource-limited LMICs: a non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Zachary J Eisner; Peter G Delaney; Haleigh Pine; Kenneth Yeh; Ilyas S Aleem; Krishnan Raghavendran; Patricia Widder
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.473

2.  Chinese expert consensus on the treatment of modern combat-related spinal injuries.

Authors:  Zhao-Wen Zong; Hao Qin; Si-Xu Chen; Jia-Zhi Yang; Lei Yang; Lin Zhang; Wen-Qiong Du; Xin Zhong; Ren-Jie Zhou; Dan Tan; Hao Wu
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-02-20

3.  New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients - consensus and evidence based.

Authors:  Christian Maschmann; Elisabeth Jeppesen; Monika Afzali Rubin; Charlotte Barfod
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Effect of a cervical collar on head and neck acceleration profiles during emergency spinal immobilisation and extrication procedures in elite football (soccer) players: protocol for a randomised, controlled cross-over trial.

Authors:  Michael J Callaghan; Tom Hughes; John Davin; Russell Hayes; Neil Hough; Daniel Torpey; David Perry; Sam Dawson; Eoghan Murray; Richard K Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-12-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.