Literature DB >> 35194169

Evaluating a novel, low-cost technique for cervical-spine immobilization for application in resource-limited LMICs: a non-inferiority trial.

Zachary J Eisner1,2, Peter G Delaney3,4, Haleigh Pine5,3, Kenneth Yeh5,3, Ilyas S Aleem6, Krishnan Raghavendran7, Patricia Widder5.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Non-inferiority trial.
OBJECTIVE: Limited cervical spinal (c-spine) immobilization in resource-limited settings of LMICs suggests alternatives are necessary for patients with traumatic injuries. We propose a novel method of c-spine immobilization using folded towels.
SETTING: Washington University in St. Louis.
METHODS: Using non-inferiority trial design, thirty healthy patients (median age = 22) were enrolled to test the efficacy of folded towels in comparison with rigid cervical collars, foam neck braces, and no immobilization. We measured cervical range of motion (CROM) in six cardinal directions in seated and supine positions. A weighted composite score (CS) was generated to compare immobilization methods. A preserved fraction of 75% was determined for non-inferiority, corresponding to the difference between the median values for CROM between control (no immobilization) and c-collar states.
RESULTS: C-collars reduce median CROM in six cardinal directions in seated and supine positions by an average of -36.83° seated (-17.75° supine) vs. no immobilization. Folded towels and foam neck braces reduced CROM by -27° seated (-16.75° supine) and -14.25° seated (-9.5° supine), respectively. Compared to a 25% non-inferiority margin (permitting an average 9.21° of cervical movement across six cardinal directions), the CS determined folded towels are non-inferior (CSseated = 0.89, CSsupine = 0.47). Foam neck braces are inferior (CSseated = 2.35, CSsupine = 2.10). CS > 1 surpassed the non-inferiority margin and were deemed inferior.
CONCLUSIONS: Folded towels are a non-inferior means of immobilizing c-spine in extension and rotation, but not flexion, vs. c-collars. We propose folded towels could be trialed in combination with backboards to deliver affordable and effective prehospital TSCI management in resource-limited settings.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35194169     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-022-00764-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.473


  34 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of spinal cord injury care in the developing world.

Authors:  Anthony S Burns; Colleen O'Connell
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Prehospital transport of patients with spinal cord injury in Nigeria.

Authors:  Kawu A Ahidjo; Salami A Olayinka; Olawepo Ayokunle; Alimi F Mustapha; Gbadegesin A A Sulaiman; Adebule T Gbolahan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  The State of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems in Africa.

Authors:  Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman; Julia M Dixon; Nana Sefa; Arthur Yancey; Bonaventure G Hollong; Mohamed Hagahmed; Adit A Ginde; Lee A Wallis
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.040

Review 4.  Prehospital cervical spinal immobilization after trauma.

Authors:  Nicholas Theodore; Mark N Hadley; Bizhan Aarabi; Sanjay S Dhall; Daniel E Gelb; R John Hurlbert; Curtis J Rozzelle; Timothy C Ryken; Beverly C Walters
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Designing a prehospital system for a developing country: estimated cost and benefits.

Authors:  M Hauswald; E Yeoh
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  A comparison of three cervical immobilization devices.

Authors:  David Hostler; Deanna Colburn; S Robert Seitz
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  Care of post-traumatic spinal cord injury patients in India: An analysis.

Authors:  Vk Pandey; V Nigam; T D Goyal; Hs Chhabra
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Clinical Characteristics and Challenges of Management of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in a Trauma Center of a Developing Country.

Authors:  Ayodeji Salman Yusuf; Muhammad Raji Mahmud; Dumura Jeneral Alfin; Samue Isa Gana; Samaila Timothy; Evaristus Emeka Nwaribe; Nasir Kurfi Dalhat; Ajibade Afeez Aruna; Mohammed Mansur Idris
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2019-10-07

9.  The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India.

Authors:  Kavi Bhalla; Veena Sriram; Radhika Arora; Richa Ahuja; Mathew Varghese; Girish Agrawal; Geetam Tiwari; Dinesh Mohan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-11-19

10.  Post-crash management of road traffic injury victims in Iran. Stakeholders' views on current barriers and potential facilitators.

Authors:  Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh; Hamid Reza Khankeh; Reza Mohammadi; Lucie Laflamme; Ali Bikmoradi; Bo J A Haglund
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-05-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  A survey on the early management of spinal trauma in low and middle-income countries: From the scene of injury to the diagnostic phase (part II).

Authors:  Andreas K Demetriades; Nicolò Marchesini; Oscar L Alves; Andrés M Rubiano; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-09-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.