| Literature DB >> 26674307 |
Abstract
Research on bisphenol A (BPA) as an environmental contaminant has now major regulatory implications toward the ecosystem health, and hence it is incumbent on scientists to do their research to the highest standards possible, in order that the most appropriate decisions are made to mitigate the impacts to aquatic wildlife. However, the contribution given so far appears rather fragmented. The present overview aims to collect available information on the effects of BPA on aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates to provide a general scenario and to suggest future developments toward more comprehensive approaches useful for aquatic species protection.Entities:
Keywords: BPA; amphibians; dose–response; endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC); fish; invertebrates
Year: 2015 PMID: 26674307 PMCID: PMC4674185 DOI: 10.1177/1559325815598304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dose Response ISSN: 1559-3258 Impact factor: 2.658
Figure 1.Scale bar of effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of bisphenol A (BPA; µg/L) in aquatic vertebrates. Upper panel: Values represent examples of BPA concentrations detected in different types of environmental samples. Lower panel: Values represent examples from laboratory experiments of BPA exposure with different vertebrate models. (1) Flint et al., 2012 and reference therein; (2) Xu W, Yan W, Huang W, Miao L, Zhong L.2014. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the Pearl River Delta and coastal environment: sources, transfer, and implications. Environ Geochem Health. 36:1095-1104. (3) Xu EG, Morton B, Lee JH, Leung KM., 2015. Environmental fate and ecological risks of nonylphenols and bisphenol A in the Cape D’Aguilar Marine Reserve, Hong Kong. Mar Pollut Bull. 91:128-138. (4) Basheer C, Lee HK, Tan KS, 2004 Endocrine disrupting alkylphenols and bisphenol-A in coastal waters and supermarket seafood from Singapore. Mar Pollut Bull. 48:1161-1167. (5) Villeneuve . (6) Mandich . (7) Lahsteiner . (8) Kashiwagi . (9) Kwak . (10) Roger and Mirza, 2013. (11) Haterf et al. 2012. (12) Kloas . (13) Heimeier . (14) Molina .
Figure 2.Scale bar of effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of bisphenol A (BPA; µg/L) in aquatic invertebrates. Upper panel, Values represent examples of maximal BPA concentrations detected in different types of environmental water samples. WWTP indicates waste water treatment plants. Lower panel, Values represent examples from laboratory experiments of BPA exposure with different invertebrate models. For reference 1-4 see Figure 1. (5) Watts et al. 2003. (6) Marcial, H.S., Hagiwara, A., Snell, T.W., 2003. Estrogenic compounds affect development of harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus japonicus. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22:3025-3030. (7) Fabbri . (8) Oehlmann, J., Schulte-Oehlmann, U., Kloas, W., Jagnytsch, O., Lutz, I., Kusk, K.O., Wollenberger, L., Santos, E.M., Paull, G.C., Van Look, K.J., Tyler, C.R., 2009. A critical analysis of the biological impacts of plasticizers on wildlife. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 2047-2062. (9) Canesi . (10) Canesi . (11) Biggers, W.J., Laufer, H., 2004. Identification of juvenile hormone-active alkylphenols in the lobster Homarus americanus and in marine sediments. Biol. Bull. 206:13-24.(12) Mariager, L., 2001. Effects of Environmental Endocrine Disrupters on a Freshwater and a Marine Crustacean. Master Thesis, Aarhus University Dept. Zool., Inst. Of Biol. Sci., Aarhus, Denmark.