Literature DB >> 26673888

Sagittal Abdominal Diameter to Measure Visceral Adipose Tissue in Overweight or Obese Adolescent Children and Its Role as A Marker of Insulin Resistance.

Santosh Kumar Krishnappa1, H T Yashoda2, Ganga Boraiah3, Suma Vishwa4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of sagittal abdominal diameter using a revalidated caliper is simple, inexpensive, non-invasive method. It strongly correlates with insulin resistance and can be used as a surrogate marker to predict risk for Type II Diabetes Mellitus. AIM: To assess visceral abdominal fat by measuring sagittal abdominal diameter using sliding calipers and to predict insulin resistance in obese or overweight adolescent children. STUDY
DESIGN: Explorative study for Paediatric age group among over weight and obese children aged 10-18 years in urban population in a Tertiary Care Centre.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paediatric population satisfying ADA guidelines for diagnosis of prediabetes were included in the study. Anthropometric measurements with SAD were recorded. Blood was collected to investigate for prediabetes and insulin resistance using HOMA-IR.
RESULTS: Out of 924 subjects who gave assent to participate in study 108 fulfilled ADA criteria. 33 subjects who didn't come for the follow up were excluded. Out of 75 subjects 12 were detected to have insulin resistance (16%) and 63 were normal (84%). Pearson's partial correlation of HOMA-IR and OGTT with SAD has demonstrated it to be better correlation with Insulin Resistance (IR) than other anthropometric measurements. Fasting Glucose correlated better with Waist Hip Circumference.
CONCLUSION: Insulin Resistance was diagnosed in 16% of the population and these had high levels of insulin resistance. SAD in relation to glucose metabolism, had a better correlation with OGTT followed by HOMA-IR and fasting Insulin. SAD with anthropometric measurements had better correlation all the parameters other than Waist Circumference, which had negative correlation. SAD can be used in evaluation of obese or overweight children for evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HOMA (Homeostatic Model Assessment); Obesity; Prediabetes

Year:  2015        PMID: 26673888      PMCID: PMC4668495          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15971.6742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  10 in total

1.  Prevalence of prediabetes in school-going children.

Authors:  D Narayanappa; H S Rajani; K B Mahendrappa; A K Prabhakar
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 1.411

2.  Sagittal abdominal diameter compared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  M Ohrvall; L Berglund; B Vessby
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-04

3.  Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study.

Authors:  G Tornaghi; R Raiteri; C Pozzato; A Rispoli; M Bramani; M Cipolat; A Craveri
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1994-11

4.  Sagittal abdominal diameter: no advantage compared with other anthropometric measures as a correlate of components of the metabolic syndrome in elderly from the Hoorn Study.

Authors:  Janine Mukuddem-Petersen; Marieke B Snijder; Rob M van Dam; Jacqueline M Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Coen D A Stehouwer; Robert J Heine; Giel Nijpels; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Homeostasis model assessment is more reliable than the fasting glucose/insulin ratio and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index for assessing insulin resistance among obese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Mehmet Keskin; Selim Kurtoglu; Mustafa Kendirci; M Emre Atabek; Cevat Yazici
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Prevalence of glucose intolerance among children and adolescents in urban South India (ORANGE-2).

Authors:  Harish Ranjani; Jagadesan Sonya; Ranjit M Anjana; Viswanathan Mohan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Validity and reliability of the sagittal abdominal diameter as a predictor of visceral abdominal fat.

Authors:  Lílian R Sampaio; Eduardo J Simões; Ana Marlúcia O Assis; Luiz R Ramos
Journal:  Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol       Date:  2007-08

8.  Association of body mass index, sagittal abdominal diameter and waist-hip ratio with cardiometabolic risk factors and adipocytokines in Arab children and adolescents.

Authors:  Omar S Al-Attas; Nasser M Al-Daghri; Majed S Alokail; Khalid M Alkharfy; Hossam Draz; Sobhy Yakout; Shaun Sabico; George Chrousos
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Sagittal abdominal diameter as a screening tool in clinical research: cutoffs for cardiometabolic risk.

Authors:  U Risérus; U de Faire; L Berglund; M-L Hellénius
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2010-03-11

10.  Sagittal abdominal diameter as a new predictor for incident diabetes.

Authors:  Pia Pajunen; Harri Rissanen; Maarit A Laaksonen; Markku Heliövaara; Antti Reunanen; Paul Knekt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 19.112

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.