M Ohrvall1, L Berglund, B Vessby. 1. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Sweden. Margareta.Ohrvall@geriatrik.uu.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abdominal adiposity has been described as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. Sagittal abdominal diameter has been found to be closely related to the amount of visceral adipose tissue. AIM: To compare the sagittal abdominal diameter with other anthropometric measures regarding their relationships to risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). DESIGN: A study of 885 men and women participating in a health survey. MEASUREMENTS: Sagittal abdominal diameter, body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio, serum concentrations of risk factors for CHD, blood pressure. RESULTS: In men the sagittal abdominal diameter showed stronger correlations to the CHD risk factors serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, apolipoprotein B (apoB), plasminogen activator inhibitor tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and lipid-corrected alpha tocopherol, and to systolic and diastolic blood pressures than the other anthropometric measurements. In women, compared with the other anthropometric measurements the sagittal abdominal diameter was more strongly correlated to serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL (high-density lipoprotein), apo B and t-PA, and to systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The sagittal abdominal diameter showed a stronger correlation to 'total risk' for cardiovascular disease (+ 0.66 for men, 0.62 for women), than waist circumference (+ 0.63 for men, + 0.57 for women) and waist-to-hip ratio (+ 0.61 for men and +0.48 for women; P <0.0001 for all correlations). This diameter was also more strongly correlated to 'metabolic risk' (+ 0.64 for men, + 0.59 for women) than waist circumference (+ 0.60 for men, + 0.59 for women) and waist-to-hip ratio (+ 0.58 for men, + 0.52 for women)(P < 0.0001 for all correlations). In a regression analysis including the anthropometric measurements and the risk values, the sagittal diameter was the strongest measure of cardiovascular risk in both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Among both men and women in this study the sagittal abdominal diameter showed stronger correlations to cardiovascular risk and to other risk factors in the metabolic syndrome than other anthropometric variables such as waist circumference, waist-to hip ratio and BMI.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal adiposity has been described as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. Sagittal abdominal diameter has been found to be closely related to the amount of visceral adipose tissue. AIM: To compare the sagittal abdominal diameter with other anthropometric measures regarding their relationships to risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). DESIGN: A study of 885 men and women participating in a health survey. MEASUREMENTS: Sagittal abdominal diameter, body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio, serum concentrations of risk factors for CHD, blood pressure. RESULTS: In men the sagittal abdominal diameter showed stronger correlations to the CHD risk factors serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, apolipoprotein B (apoB), plasminogen activator inhibitor tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and lipid-corrected alpha tocopherol, and to systolic and diastolic blood pressures than the other anthropometric measurements. In women, compared with the other anthropometric measurements the sagittal abdominal diameter was more strongly correlated to serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL (high-density lipoprotein), apo B and t-PA, and to systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The sagittal abdominal diameter showed a stronger correlation to 'total risk' for cardiovascular disease (+ 0.66 for men, 0.62 for women), than waist circumference (+ 0.63 for men, + 0.57 for women) and waist-to-hip ratio (+ 0.61 for men and +0.48 for women; P <0.0001 for all correlations). This diameter was also more strongly correlated to 'metabolic risk' (+ 0.64 for men, + 0.59 for women) than waist circumference (+ 0.60 for men, + 0.59 for women) and waist-to-hip ratio (+ 0.58 for men, + 0.52 for women)(P < 0.0001 for all correlations). In a regression analysis including the anthropometric measurements and the risk values, the sagittal diameter was the strongest measure of cardiovascular risk in both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Among both men and women in this study the sagittal abdominal diameter showed stronger correlations to cardiovascular risk and to other risk factors in the metabolic syndrome than other anthropometric variables such as waist circumference, waist-to hip ratio and BMI.
Authors: Nina C Franklin; Austin T Robinson; Jing-Tan Bian; Mohamed M Ali; Edita Norkeviciute; Patrick McGinty; Shane A Phillips Journal: Metab Syndr Relat Disord Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 1.894
Authors: Torsten Olbers; Sofia Björkman; Ak Lindroos; Almantas Maleckas; Lars Lönn; Lars Sjöström; Hans Lönroth Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 12.969