Literature DB >> 26672769

Organometallic Ru(II) Photosensitizers Derived from π-Expansive Cyclometalating Ligands: Surprising Theranostic PDT Effects.

Tariq Sainuddin1, Julia McCain1, Mitch Pinto1, Huimin Yin1, Jordan Gibson1, Marc Hetu1, Sherri A McFarland1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of π-expansive cyclometalating ligands on the photophysical and photobiological properties of organometallic Ru(II) compounds. Four compounds with increasing π conjugation on the cyclometalating ligand were prepared, and their structures were confirmed by HPLC, 1D and 2D (1)H NMR, and mass spectrometry. The properties of these compounds differed substantially from their Ru(II) polypyridyl counterparts. Namely, they were characterized by red-shifted absorption, very weak to no room temperature phosphorescence, extremely short phosphorescence state lifetimes (<10 ns), low singlet oxygen quantum yields (0.5-8%), and efficient ligand-centered fluorescence. Three of the metal complexes were very cytotoxic to cancer cells in the dark (EC50 values = 1-2 μM), in agreement with what has traditionally been observed for Ru(II) compounds derived from small C^N ligands. Surprisingly, the complex derived from the most π-expansive cyclometalating ligand exhibited no cytotoxicity in the dark (EC50 > 300 μM) but was phototoxic to cells in the nanomolar regime. Exceptionally large phototherapeutic margins, exceeding 3 orders of magnitude in some cases, were accompanied by bright ligand-centered intracellular fluorescence in cancer cells. Thus, Ru(II) organometallic systems derived from π-expansive cyclometalating ligands, such 4,9,16-triazadibenzo[a,c]napthacene (pbpn), represent the first class of potent light-responsive Ru(II) cyclometalating agents with theranostic potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26672769     DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  15 in total

1.  Cyclometalated Ruthenium(II) Complexes Derived from α-Oligothiophenes as Highly Selective Cytotoxic or Photocytotoxic Agents.

Authors:  Goutam Ghosh; Katsuya L Colón; Anderson Fuller; Tariq Sainuddin; Evan Bradner; Julia McCain; Susan M A Monro; Huimin Yin; Marc W Hetu; Colin G Cameron; Sherri A McFarland
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Dual Photoreactivity of a New Rh2(II,II) Complex for Biological Applications.

Authors:  Regina N Akhimie; Jessica K White; Claudia Turro
Journal:  Inorganica Chim Acta       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  4-Hydroxyl-oxoisoaporphine, one small molecule as theranostic agent for simultaneous fluorescence imaging and photodynamic therapy as type II photosensitizer.

Authors:  Qi Xu; Yunfan Ji; Meijun Chen; Xusheng Shao
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  The development of anticancer ruthenium(ii) complexes: from single molecule compounds to nanomaterials.

Authors:  Leli Zeng; Pranav Gupta; Yanglu Chen; Enju Wang; Liangnian Ji; Hui Chao; Zhe-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 54.564

5.  Synthesis and Characterization of Ru(II) Complexes with π-Expansive Imidazophen Ligands for the Photokilling of Human Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Goutam Ghosh; Huimin Yin; Susan M A Monro; Tariq Sainuddin; Lloyd Lapoot; Alexander Greer; Sherri A McFarland
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Os(II) Oligothienyl Complexes as a Hypoxia-Active Photosensitizer Class for Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  John A Roque; Patrick C Barrett; Houston D Cole; Liubov M Lifshits; Evan Bradner; Ge Shi; David von Dohlen; Susy Kim; Nino Russo; Gagan Deep; Colin G Cameron; Marta E Alberto; Sherri A McFarland
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 7.  Metal-based photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy: the future of multimodal oncology?

Authors:  Sherri A McFarland; Arkady Mandel; Roger Dumoulin-White; Gilles Gasser
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Singlet Oxygen Formation vs Photodissociation for Light-Responsive Protic Ruthenium Anticancer Compounds: The Oxygenated Substituent Determines Which Pathway Dominates.

Authors:  Fengrui Qu; Robert W Lamb; Colin G Cameron; Seungjo Park; Olaitan Oladipupo; Jessica L Gray; Yifei Xu; Houston D Cole; Marco Bonizzoni; Yonghyun Kim; Sherri A McFarland; Charles Edwin Webster; Elizabeth T Papish
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  Ruthenium-initiated polymerization of lactide: a route to remarkable cellular uptake for photodynamic therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Nancy Soliman; Luke K McKenzie; Johannes Karges; Emilie Bertrand; Mickaël Tharaud; Marta Jakubaszek; Vincent Guérineau; Bruno Goud; Marcel Hollenstein; Gilles Gasser; Christophe M Thomas
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  It Takes Three to Tango - the length of the oligothiophene determines the nature of the long-lived excited state and the resulting photocytotoxicity of a Ru(II) photodrug.

Authors:  Avinash Chettri; John A Roque; Kilian R A Schneider; Houston D Cole; Colin G Cameron; Sherri A McFarland; Benjamin Dietzek
Journal:  ChemPhotoChem       Date:  2021-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.