Mario Musella1, Marco Milone1, Paolo Bianco1, Paola Maietta1, Giuseppe Galloro2. 1. 1 General Surgery, Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University , Naples, Italy . 2. 2 Surgical Endoscopy, Clinical Medicine and Surgery Department, "Federico II" University , Naples, Italy .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite leakages remaining a worrisome complication, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the preferred choice for most bariatric surgeons in Italy. In light of the emerging trend to discharge patients on postoperative day (POD) 1 or to consider LSG as an outpatient procedure, we felt it useful in selected cases to define a treatment protocol aimed to manage patients presenting with an acute postoperative leakage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Starting from 2007, 295 LSGs have been performed at our institution. Six patients, including 5 from our series (1.6%), were treated for a leak. The first patient presented a leak on POD 3, whereas the next 2 patients were re-admitted on POD 11 and 12, respectively. They all underwent a conservative treatment. The last 3 patients, according to a suggested algorithm, underwent a prompt surgical repair. RESULTS: The conservatively treated patients were discharged following 22 ± 7.7 days, whereas patients treated by surgery were discharged following 10 ± 0.8 days (P = .09). By not considering the cost of primary LSG, which is about 5600 € in our region, the expense for every patient treated by re-intervention was about 2500 €. The cost for each patient treated by stenting was about 4700 €. The cost for each patient treated conservatively was about 5700 €. CONCLUSIONS: According to our series and in agreement with published data, it is reasonable in selected cases to consider a wider role for early surgery. A timely surgical approach following an appropriate algorithm may offer a resolutive and cost-effective answer to the management of acute leaks following LSG.
INTRODUCTION: Despite leakages remaining a worrisome complication, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the preferred choice for most bariatric surgeons in Italy. In light of the emerging trend to discharge patients on postoperative day (POD) 1 or to consider LSG as an outpatient procedure, we felt it useful in selected cases to define a treatment protocol aimed to manage patients presenting with an acute postoperative leakage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Starting from 2007, 295 LSGs have been performed at our institution. Six patients, including 5 from our series (1.6%), were treated for a leak. The first patient presented a leak on POD 3, whereas the next 2 patients were re-admitted on POD 11 and 12, respectively. They all underwent a conservative treatment. The last 3 patients, according to a suggested algorithm, underwent a prompt surgical repair. RESULTS: The conservatively treated patients were discharged following 22 ± 7.7 days, whereas patients treated by surgery were discharged following 10 ± 0.8 days (P = .09). By not considering the cost of primary LSG, which is about 5600 € in our region, the expense for every patient treated by re-intervention was about 2500 €. The cost for each patient treated by stenting was about 4700 €. The cost for each patient treated conservatively was about 5700 €. CONCLUSIONS: According to our series and in agreement with published data, it is reasonable in selected cases to consider a wider role for early surgery. A timely surgical approach following an appropriate algorithm may offer a resolutive and cost-effective answer to the management of acute leaks following LSG.
Authors: B Guida; M Cataldi; L Busetto; M L Aiello; M Musella; D Capone; S Parolisi; V Policastro; G Ragozini; A Belfiore Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Mario Musella; Francesco Di Capua; Maria D'Armiento; Nunzio Velotti; Alessio Bocchetti; Katia Di Lauro; Giuseppe Galloro; Severo Campione; Giuseppe Petrella; Francesco Paolo D'Armiento Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.129