Literature DB >> 26670427

Is there comparable morbidity in pylorus-preserving and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy? A meta-analysis.

Qi-Jun Chen1, Zhi-Qiang He1, Yan Yang2, Yu-Shun Zhang1, Xing-Lin Chen3, Hong-Ji Yang4, Shi-Kai Zhu4, Ping-Yong Zhong4, Chong Yang5, He-Shui Wu6.   

Abstract

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the most effective treatment for patients with pancreatic head or periampullary lesions. Two major strategies exist: pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD). However, it is yet unclear regarding the morbidity after PPPD and PRPD. This study analyzed the morbidity after PPPD and PRPD to determine the optimal surgical treatment of masses in the pancreatic head or periampullary region. A systematic search of databases identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science was performed. Outcome was compared by postoperative morbidity including overall morbidity, pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) rate between PPPD and PRPD. The DGE rate in the PRPD subgroups (conventional PD [CPD] and subtotal stomach-preserving PD [SSPPD], respectively) was also analyzed. The results showed that 9 RCTs including 722 participants were included for meta-analysis. Among these RCTs, 7 manuscripts described PRPD as CPD, and 2 manuscripts described PRPD as SSPPD. There were no significant differences in the overall morbidity, pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, or biliary leakage between PPPD and PRPD. There was a lower rate of DGE with PRPD than that with PPPD (RR=2.15, P=0.03, 95% CI, 1.09-4.23). Further subgroup analysis indicated a comparable DGE rate for the CPD but a lower DGE rate for the SSPPD group than the PPPD group. However, the result did not indicate any difference between CPD and SSPPD regarding the DGE rate (P=0.92). It is suggested that PPPD is comparable to PRPD in overall morbidity, pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding and biliary leakage. The current data are not sufficient to draw a conclusion regarding which surgical procedure is associated with a lower postoperative DGE rate. Our conclusions were limited by the available data. Further evaluations of RCTs are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  meta-analysis; morbidity; pancreaticoduodenectomy; pylorus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26670427     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-015-1509-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  39 in total

Review 1.  Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Sterne; M Egger; G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-14

2.  Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection-long term results.

Authors:  C A Seiler; M Wagner; T Bachmann; C A Redaelli; B Schmied; W Uhl; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without pylorus preservation have similar outcomes.

Authors:  Richard H Bell
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Peripyloric lymph node metastasis is a rare condition in carcinoma of the pancreatic head.

Authors:  Berthold Gerdes; Annette Ramaswamy; Detlef K Bartsch; Matthias Rothmund
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: PPPD versus Whipple procedure.

Authors:  Pin-Wen Lin; Yan-Shen Shan; Yih-Jyh Lin; Chung-Jye Hung
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

6.  Preservation of the pyloric ring has little value in surgery for pancreatic head cancer: a comparative study comparing three surgical procedures.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Mitsuro Kanda; Yasuhiro Kodera; Shunji Nagai; Tevfik T Sahin; Masamichi Hayashi; Akiyuki Kanzaki; Suguru Yamada; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Shuji Nomoto; Shin Takeda; Satoshi Morita; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  A prospective randomized comparison between pylorus- and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy on postoperative delayed gastric emptying occurrence and long-term nutritional status.

Authors:  Ippei Matsumoto; Makoto Shinzeki; Sadaki Asari; Tadahiro Goto; Sachiyo Shirakawa; Tetsuo Ajiki; Takumi Fukumoto; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Yonson Ku
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

9.  Prospective randomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P W Lin; Y J Lin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Reconsideration of postoperative oral intake tolerance after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective consecutive analysis of delayed gastric emptying according to the ISGPS definition and the amount of dietary intake.

Authors:  Emi Akizuki; Yasutoshi Kimura; Takayuki Nobuoka; Masafumi Imamura; Minoru Nagayama; Tomoko Sonoda; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Randomized Trial of Pylorus-Preserving vs. Pylorus-Resecting Pancreatoduodenectomy: Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Pascal Probst; Felix J Hüttner; Thomas Bruckner; Oliver Strobel; Markus K Diener; André L Mihaljevic; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Pylorus preservation pancreatectomy or not.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Pascal Probst; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-04

3.  Clinical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma depending on preservation or resection of pylorus.

Authors:  Yeon Jin Kim; Sang Hyun Shin; In Woong Han; Youngju Ryu; Naru Kim; Dong Wook Choi; Jin Seok Heo
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2020-08-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.