Literature DB >> 21735323

Preservation of the pyloric ring has little value in surgery for pancreatic head cancer: a comparative study comparing three surgical procedures.

Tsutomu Fujii1, Mitsuro Kanda, Yasuhiro Kodera, Shunji Nagai, Tevfik T Sahin, Masamichi Hayashi, Akiyuki Kanzaki, Suguru Yamada, Hiroyuki Sugimoto, Shuji Nomoto, Shin Takeda, Satoshi Morita, Akimasa Nakao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) has replaced conventional pancreatoduodenectomy with a distal gastrectomy (cPD) as the most commonly performed procedure. However, there has been no evidence from prospective studies to indicate the overwhelming superiority of PPPD over cPD. A recent report revealed that resection of the pyloric ring reduced the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in a randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: In 158 patients with pancreatic head cancer, the perioperative outcomes and long-term nutritional consequences were retrospectively compared among three types of pancreatoduodenectomy: cPD; PPPD; and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (SSPPD), in which the pyloric ring and duodenum were removed and more than 90% of the stomach was preserved.
RESULTS: The incidence of DGE was significantly higher in the PPPD group than in the cPD and SSPPD groups (27.3 vs. 5.8 and 5.4%, respectively; P = 0.0012). The serum albumin concentration and total lymphocyte count at 1 year postoperatively were significantly higher in the SSPPD group than in the PPPD group (P = 0.0303 and P = 0.0203, respectively). The patients in the SSPPD group showed longer survival times than the patients in the cPD and PPPD groups (median survival times, 21.3, 17.1, and 17.7 months, respectively), although the differences did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that preservation of the pyloric ring without vagal innervation has little significance, and that SSPPD with better perioperative and long-term outcomes is more suitable as a standard procedure for patients with pancreatic head cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735323     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1901-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  25 in total

1.  THE OBITUARY OF THE PYLORUS-PRESERVING PANCREATODUODENECTOMY.

Authors:  Orlando Jorge Martins Torres; Rodrigo Rodrigues Vasques; Camila Cristina S Torres
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

2.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of a change in gastric emptying and nutritional status after a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison between an antecolic and a vertical retrocolic duodenojejunostomy.

Authors:  Naoya Imamura; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Jiro Ohuchida; Masahide Hiyoshi; Motoaki Nagano; Kazuhiro Otani; Kazuhiro Kondo
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Factors influencing clinically significant delayed gastric emptying after subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Go Sato; Yoichi Ishizaki; Jiro Yoshimoto; Hiroyuki Sugo; Hiroshi Imamura; Seiji Kawasaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Clinical benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: an observational study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Sohei Satoi; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Hideki Takami; Tomohisa Yamamoto; Mitsuro Kanda; So Yamaki; Satoshi Hirooka; Masanori Kon; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is Subtotal Stomach Preserving Better or Pylorus Preserving?

Authors:  Mena M Hanna; Mena Hanna; Rahul Gadde; Leonardo Tamariz; Casey J Allen; Casey Allen; Jonathan P Meizoso; Jonathan Meizoso; Danny Sleeman; Alan S Livingstone; Alan Livingstone; Danny Yakoub
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Reduction of the Incidence of Delayed Gastric Emptying in Side-to-Side Gastrojejunostomy in Subtotal Stomach-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Toru Nakamura; Yoshiyasu Ambo; Takehiro Noji; Naoya Okada; Minoru Takada; Toru Shimizu; On Suzuki; Fumitaka Nakamura; Nobuichi Kashimura; Akihiro Kishida; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  A case-matched comparison and meta-analysis comparing pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Liang Lin; Lupeng Wu; Donghui Xu; Bin Li
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Randomized Trial of Pylorus-Preserving vs. Pylorus-Resecting Pancreatoduodenectomy: Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Pascal Probst; Felix J Hüttner; Thomas Bruckner; Oliver Strobel; Markus K Diener; André L Mihaljevic; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy vs pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Jun-Jie Xiong; Mei-Hua Wan; Peter Szatmary; Shameena Bharucha; Ilias Gomatos; Quentin M Nunes; Qing Xia; Robert Sutton; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer is crucial.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.