| Literature DB >> 26670305 |
I Zahoor1, M A Mitchell2, S Hall2, P M Beard3, R M Gous4, D J De Koning5, P M Hocking3.
Abstract
An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that muscle damage in fast-growing broiler chickens is associated with an ambient temperature that does not permit the birds to lose metabolic heat resulting in physiological heat stress and a reduction in meat quality. The experiment was performed in 4 climate chambers and was repeated in 2 trials using a total of 200 male broiler chickens. Two treatments compared the recommended temperature profile and a cool regimen. The cool regimen was defined by a theoretical model that determined the environmental temperature that would enable heat generated by the bird to be lost to the environment. There were no differences in growth rate or feed intake between the two treatments. Breast muscles from birds on the recommended temperature regimen were lighter, less red and more yellow than those from the cool temperature regimen. There were no differences in moisture loss or shear strength but stiffness was greater in breast muscle from birds housed in the cool compared to the recommended regimen. Histopathological changes in the breast muscle were similar in both treatments and were characterised by mild to severe myofibre degeneration and necrosis with regeneration, fibrosis and adipocyte infiltration. There was no difference in plasma creatine kinase activity, a measure of muscle cell damage, between the two treatments consistent with the absence of differences in muscle pathology. It was concluded that breast muscle damage in fast-growing broiler chickens was not the result of an inability to lose metabolic heat at recommended ambient temperatures. The results suggest that muscle cell damage and breast meat quality concerns in modern broiler chickens are related to genetic selection for muscle yields and that genetic selection to address breast muscle integrity in a balanced breeding programme is imperative.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26670305 PMCID: PMC4784492 DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2015.1124067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br Poult Sci ISSN: 0007-1668 Impact factor: 2.095
Control and low temperature (cool) environmental temperature profiles to which male broiler chickens were subjected at different ages. The control temperature profile was that recommended in the breeder’s manual (Aviagen, 2007). The temperatures of the cool treatment were based on a theoretical model of ambient temperatures required for broilers to exhibit potential protein growth (EFG, 2009). Relative humidity was 70% to day 5 and 60% thereafter in both treatments.
| Age (d) | Control (°C) | Cool (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 30 |
| 3 | 28 | 28 |
| 6 | 27 | 27 |
| 9 | 26 | 26 |
| 12 | 25 | 25 |
| 15 | 24 | 24 |
| 18 | 23 | 23 |
| 21 | 22 | 20.5 |
| 24 | 21 | 19 |
| 27 | 21 | 17 |
| 30 | 21 | 16 |
| 33 | 21 | 15 |
| 36 | 21 | 14 |
| 39 | 21 | 14 |
Mean values and SED of muscle and meat quality traits in male broilers exposed to conventional or cool environmental temperatures from 3 to 6 weeks of age.
| Trait | Conventional | Cool | SED | Significance ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rectal temperature (°C) | 41.4 | 41.2 | 0.05 | 0.025 |
| Creatine kinase, ln mU/mla | 5.68 (293) | 5.82 (338) | 0.112 | 0.200 |
| pHi | 6.82 | 6.84 | 0.062 | 0.551 |
| phu | 5.92 | 5.95 | 0.034 | 0.530 |
| L*i | 59.1 | 57.3 | 0.40 | 0.006 |
| a*i | 12.8 | 13.8 | 0.36 | 0.038 |
| b*i | 7.18 | 6.26 | 0.292 | 0.025 |
| L*u | 62.5 | 60.2 | 0.87 | 0.043 |
| a*u | 11.7 | 12. 8 | 0.24 | 0.007 |
| b*u | 7.48 | 6.79 | 0.446 | 0.183 |
| Moisture loss (%) | 24.5 | 23.8 | 0.99 | 0.556 |
| Maximum load (N) | 3.00 | 2.96 | 0.044 | 0.472 |
| Stiffness (N/mm) | 5.71 | 6.92 | 0.201 | 0.002 |
aBack-transformed means in parenthesis.
Figure 1. (a) H&E stained section of breast muscle with mild (grade 1) pathology, showing individual myofibre degeneration (arrow). (b) Higher magnification showing fragmented, pale eosinophilic sarcoplasm with infiltration by heterophils and mononuclear inflammatory cells. (c) Breast muscle with marked (grade 3) pathology characterised by widespread variation in myofibre size and shape and separation of myofibres by collagen. (d) Higher magnification showing degenerate (*) and necrotic (arrowhead) myofibres. Scale bar is 200 μm in (a) and (b) and 20 μm in (c) and (d).
Figure 2. (a) Longitudinal section of breast muscle showing an unaffected myofibre (u), a necrotic myofibre (n) and a regenerating myofibre (r). (b) Adipocyte “cords” (arrowheads) present within the breast muscle. (c) H&E stained section of breast muscle with prominent perivascular cuffing (arrow). Scale bar is 20 μm in (a) and (c) and 200 μm in (b).