Literature DB >> 26668509

Clinicopathological characteristics of clinical early gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach.

Daisuke Ichikawa1, Shuhei Komatsu1, Toshiyuki Kosuga1, Hirotaka Konishi1, Kazuma Okamoto1, Atsushi Shiozaki1, Hitoshi Fujiwara1, Eigo Otsuji1.   

Abstract

AIM: To elucidate the clinicopathological characteristics of clinically early gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach and to clarify treatment precautions.
METHODS: A total of 683 patients with clinical early gastric cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study, 128 of whom had gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach (U group). All patients underwent a double contrast barium examination, endoscopy, and computed tomography (CT), and were diagnosed preoperatively based on the findings obtained. The clinicopathological features of these patients were compared with those of patients with gastric cancer in the middle- and lower-third stomach (ML group). We also compared clinicopathological factors between accurate-diagnosis and under-diagnosis groups in order to identify factors affecting the accuracy of a preoperative diagnosis of tumor depth.
RESULTS: Patients in the U group were older (P = 0.029), had a higher ratio of males to females (P = 0.015), and had more histologically differentiated tumors (P = 0.007) than patients in the ML group. A clinical under-diagnosis occurred in 57 out of 683 patients (8.3%), and was more frequent in the U group than in the ML group (16.4% vs 6.3%, P < 0.0001). Therefore, the rates of lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion were slightly higher in the U group than in the ML group (P = 0.071 and 0.082, respectively). An under-diagnosis was more frequent in histologically undifferentiated tumors (P = 0.094) and in those larger than 4 cm (P = 0.024). The median follow-up period after surgery was 56 mo (range, 1-186 mo). Overall, survival and disease-specific survival rates were significantly lower in the U group than in the ML group (P = 0.016 and 0.020, respectively). However, limited operation-related cancer recurrence was not detected in the U group in the present study.
CONCLUSION: Clinical early gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach has distinguishable characteristics that increase the risk of a clinical under-diagnosis, especially in patients with larger or undifferentiated tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Gastric cancer; Upper-third stomach

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26668509      PMCID: PMC4671040          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  Impact of tumor location on clinical outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoon; Choong Nam Shim; Sook Hee Chung; Wan Park; Hyunsoo Chung; Hyuk Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee; Jun Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Is endoscopic ultrasonography still the modality of choice in preoperative staging of gastric cancer?

Authors:  Sung Wook Hwang; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Diagnosis of the invasion depth of gastric cancer using MDCT with virtual gastroscopy: comparison with staging with endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Furukawa; Ryoji Miyahara; Akihiro Itoh; Naoki Ohmiya; Yoshiki Hirooka; Kensaku Mori; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Early gastric cancer. Endoscopic diagnosis of depth of invasion.

Authors:  T Sano; Y Okuyama; O Kobori; T Shimizu; Y Morioka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Early carcinoma of the gastric cardia in Japan: is it different from that in the West?

Authors:  T Okabayashi; T Gotoda; H Kondo; T Inui; H Ono; D Saito; S Yoshida; M Sasako; T Shimoda
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Gastric cancer arising from the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy: a review.

Authors:  Shinsuke Takeno; Tatsuya Hashimoto; Kenji Maki; Ryosuke Shibata; Hironari Shiwaku; Ippei Yamana; Risako Yamashita; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Shuo-Meng Xiao; Ling-Chao Tang; Zhi Ding; Xiang Zhou; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Is gastric cancer different in Korea and the United States? Impact of tumor location on prognosis.

Authors:  Jung Ho Shim; Kyo Young Song; Hae Myung Jeon; Cho Hyun Park; Lindsay M Jacks; Mithat Gonen; Manish A Shah; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Risk factors and management of positive horizontal margin in early gastric cancer resected by en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Norifumi Numata; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Kenichi Kagemoto; Yoji Sanomura; Shigeto Yoshida; Koji Arihiro; Fumio Shimamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Gastric cancer staging: EUS and CT.

Authors:  Amila Mehmedović; Rusmir Mesihović; Aida Saray; Nenad Vanis
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2014
View more
  6 in total

1.  Location characteristics of early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Dae Hwan Kang; Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Su Jin Kim; Hyeong Seok Nam; Dae Gon Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Shoji; Souya Nunobe; Satoshi Ida; Koshi Kumagai; Manabu Ohashi; Takeshi Sano; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 7.701

3.  A cumulative score based on preoperative fibrinogen and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio to predict outcomes in resectable gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xuechao Liu; Zhimin Liu; Enzi Lin; Yingbo Chen; Xiaowei Sun; Zhiwei Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Upper Early Gastric Cancer: A KLASS 05 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sun-Hwi Hwang; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Hoon Hur; Han-Kwang Yang; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Hyoung-Il Kim; Seong-Ho Kong; Young Woo Kim; Han Hong Lee; Beom Su Kim; Young-Kyu Park; Young-Joon Lee; Sang-Hoon Ahn; In-Seob Lee; Yun-Suhk Suh; Ji-Ho Park; Soyeon Ahn; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.197

5.  Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis and defining a subgroup treatable for laparoscopic lymph node dissection after endoscopic submucosal dissection in poorly differentiated early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hua Li; Zhi-Bin Huo; Fan-Ting Kong; Qing-Qiang He; Yun-He Gao; Wen-Quan Liang; Deng-Xiang Liu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10-15

6.  Characteristics of proximal early gastric cancer differentiating distal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jin Sung Koh; Moon Kyung Joo; Jong-Jae Park; Beom Jae Lee; Hoon Jai Chun; Sang Woo Lee; You-Jin Jang; Young-Jae Mok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.