Literature DB >> 26667248

Psychiatrists' Comfort Using Computers and Other Electronic Devices in Clinical Practice.

Farifteh F Duffy1, Laura J Fochtmann2, Diana E Clarke3,4, Keila Barber3, Seung-Hee Hong5, Joel Yager6, Eve K Mościcki3, Robert M Plovnick7.   

Abstract

This report highlights findings from the Study of Psychiatrists' Use of Informational Resources in Clinical Practice, a cross-sectional Web- and paper-based survey that examined psychiatrists' comfort using computers and other electronic devices in clinical practice. One-thousand psychiatrists were randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile and asked to complete the survey between May and August, 2012. A total of 152 eligible psychiatrists completed the questionnaire (response rate 22.2 %). The majority of psychiatrists reported comfort using computers for educational and personal purposes. However, 26 % of psychiatrists reported not using or not being comfortable using computers for clinical functions. Psychiatrists under age 50 were more likely to report comfort using computers for all purposes than their older counterparts. Clinical tasks for which computers were reportedly used comfortably, specifically by psychiatrists younger than 50, included documenting clinical encounters, prescribing, ordering laboratory tests, accessing read-only patient information (e.g., test results), conducting internet searches for general clinical information, accessing online patient educational materials, and communicating with patients or other clinicians. Psychiatrists generally reported comfort using computers for personal and educational purposes. However, use of computers in clinical care was less common, particularly among psychiatrists 50 and older. Information and educational resources need to be available in a variety of accessible, user-friendly, computer and non-computer-based formats, to support use across all ages. Moreover, ongoing training and technical assistance with use of electronic and mobile device technologies in clinical practice is needed. Research on barriers to clinical use of computers is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical practice; Computer use; EHR; Health care technology; Psychiatry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26667248      PMCID: PMC4907880          DOI: 10.1007/s11126-015-9410-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  37 in total

1.  Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system.

Authors:  W R Hersh; M K Crabtree; D H Hickam; L Sacherek; L Rose; C P Friedman
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-10

2.  Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Sandra L Decker; Eric W Jamoom; Jane E Sisk
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Physician specialty and variations in adoption of electronic health records.

Authors:  Z M Grinspan; S Banerjee; R Kaushal; L M Kern
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.

Authors:  Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Sowmya R Rao; Karen Donelan; Timothy G Ferris; Ashish Jha; Rainu Kaushal; Douglas E Levy; Sara Rosenbaum; Alexandra E Shields; David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits.

Authors:  Sowmya R Rao; Catherine M Desroches; Karen Donelan; Eric G Campbell; Paola D Miralles; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Electronic Health Record Adoption among Obstetrician/Gynecologists in the United States: Physician Practices and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Greta B Raglan; Benyamin Margolis; Ronald A Paulus; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.095

7.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study.

Authors:  John W Ely; Jerome A Osheroff; Mark H Ebell; M Lee Chambliss; Daniel C Vinson; James J Stevermer; Eric A Pifer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

8.  Physician adoption of electronic health record systems: United States, 2011.

Authors:  Eric Jamoom; Paul Beatty; Anita Bercovitz; David Woodwell; Kathleen Palso; Elizabeth Rechtsteiner
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2012-07

9.  Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011.

Authors:  Vaishali Patel; Eric Jamoom; Chun-Ju Hsiao; Michael F Furukawa; Melinda Buntin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Using the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database: how do clinicians really search?

Authors:  Emma Meats; Jon Brassey; Carl Heneghan; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Developing a Technology Acceptability and Usage Survey (TAUS) for mHealth Intervention Planning and Evaluation in Nigeria: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kathleen A Lynch; Thomas M Atkinson; Adeleye D Omisore; Olusola Famurewa; Olalekan Olasehinde; Oluwole Odujoko; Olusegun I Alatise; Adedeji Egberongbe; T Peter Kingham; Elizabeth A Morris; Elizabeth Sutton
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 2.  Digital Health Competencies Among Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jessica Longhini; Giacomo Rossettini; Alvisa Palese
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 7.076

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.