| Literature DB >> 26664604 |
Biljana M Šmit1, Radoslav Z Pavlović1, Dejan A Milenković2, Zoran S Marković3.
Abstract
The mechanism and selectivity of a bicyclic hydantoin formation byEntities:
Keywords: density functional theory; fused bicyclic hydantoins; intermediate; reaction mechanism; regioselectivity; selenocyclization
Year: 2015 PMID: 26664604 PMCID: PMC4661018 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.11.200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Scheme 1Proposed mechanism for the selenocyclization of model substrate 1.
Scheme 25-Exo pathway of the proposed mechanism with all possible intermediates and products.
Figure 11H NMR monitoring of the cyclization of 5-alkenylhydantoin 1 with PhSeCl in acetonitrile-d3 solution in the presence of silica gel at ambient temperature during 15 h.
Calculated and experimental 1H chemical shifts of selected protons.a
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||
| Calcd | Calcd | Expb | Calcd | Exp | Calcd | Exp | |
| C(5)H | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 3.9 |
| C(3)H2 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.4 |
| C(4)H2 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| C(1)H3 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| C(7)H3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| C(8)H3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Mean absolute error (MAE) | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.10 | |||
| δ(exp) = | |||||||
| S | 0.28 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.05 | |||
| F | 28.96 | 68.96 | 120.2 | 1654.62 | |||
| N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||
| R | 0.940 | 0.970 | 0.980 | 0.999 | |||
| R2 | 0.880 | 0.940 | 0.970 | 0.998 | |||
aNumeration of C-atoms given in the structures are for calculation and comparison with experimental data only. bExperimental values are given at nearest 0.1 ppm.
Figure 2Optimized geometries of possible Markovnikov-type intermediates formed by the anti-stereospecific addition of PhSeCl on model substrate 1, with relative free energy values indicated in kJ/mol. The crucial bond lengths are given in pm.
Figure 3Energy profile for the proposed mechanism of selenocyclization of model substrate 1. Relative energies are given in kJ/mol.
Figure 4Optimized geometries for seleniranium cations and corresponding transition states for the formation of the five-membered ring (S,R)-TS-INT3 and (S,S)-TS-INT3 and six-membered ring (S,R)-TS-INT3’ and (S,S)-TS-INT3’. The crucial bond lengths are given in pm.
Figure 5Optimized geometries of intermediate bicyclic imidazolinium cations. The crucial bond lengths are given in pm.
Figure 6Optimized geometries of possible products of the selenocyclization of 1, with relative free energy values indicated in kJ/mol. The crucial bond lengths are given in pm.
Calculated free activation energies (ΔG≠) and rate constants (k) for the formation of INT3 and INT3’ intermediates in acetonitrile.
| Structure | Δ | |
| ( | 90.9 | 7.34 × 10−4 |
| ( | 42.0 | 2.77 × 105 |
| ( | 85.4 | 6.79 × 10−3 |
| ( | 57.0 | 6.52 × 102 |
All parameters were calculated in acetonitrile as solvent.
Scheme 3Proposed mechanism for selenocyclization of model substrate 3.
Figure 7Optimized geometries of possible intermediates of the selenocyclization of model substrate 3, with relative free energy values indicated in kJ/mol.
Figure 8Optimized geometries of possible products of the selenocyclization of model substrate 3, with relative free energy values indicated in kJ/mol.