Literature DB >> 26661857

Comparing Latent Means Without Mean Structure Models: A Projection-Based Approach.

Lifang Deng1, Ke-Hai Yuan2.   

Abstract

The conventional setup for multi-group structural equation modeling requires a stringent condition of cross-group equality of intercepts before mean comparison with latent variables can be conducted. This article proposes a new setup that allows mean comparison without the need to estimate any mean structural model. By projecting the observed sample means onto the space of the common scores and the space orthogonal to that of the common scores, the new setup allows identifying and estimating the means of the common and specific factors, although, without replicate measures, variances of specific factors cannot be distinguished from those of measurement errors. Under the new setup, testing cross-group mean differences of the common scores is done independently from that of the specific factors. Such independent testing eliminates the requirement for cross-group equality of intercepts by the conventional setup in order to test cross-group equality of means of latent variables using chi-square-difference statistics. The most appealing piece of the new setup is a validity index for mean differences, defined as the percentage of the sum of the squared observed mean differences that is due to that of the mean differences of the common scores. By analyzing real data with two groups, the new setup is shown to offer more information than what is obtained under the conventional setup.

Keywords:  bootstrap; chi-square-difference statistic; common score; measurement invariance; specific factor; wald statistic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26661857     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9491-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  9 in total

1.  Bootstrap approach to inference and power analysis based on three test statistics for covariance structure models.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Kentaro Hayashi
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?

Authors:  L T Hu; P M Bentler; Y Kano
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research.

Authors:  J L Horn; J J McArdle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1992 Autumn-Winter       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.

Authors:  Roger E Millsap; Oi-Man Kwok
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-03

5.  Multigroup Comparisons and the Assumption of Equivalent Construct Validity Across Groups: Methodological and Substantive Issues.

Authors:  B M Byrne
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Comment on the asymptotics of a distribution-free goodness of fit test statistic.

Authors:  Michael W Browne; Alexander Shapiro
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Continuous orthogonal complement functions and distribution-free goodness of fit tests in moment structure analysis.

Authors:  Robert Jennrich; Albert Satorra
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Keith F Widaman; Robin H Pugh
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Anxiety in Athletes: Gender and Type of Sport Differences.

Authors:  Marco Correia; António Rosado
Journal:  Int J Psychol Res (Medellin)       Date:  2019 Jan-Jun

2.  Pandemic paranoia in the general population: international prevalence and sociodemographic profile.

Authors:  Lyn Ellett; Björn Schlier; Jessica L Kingston; Chen Zhu; Suzanne Ho-Wai So; Tania M Lincoln; Eric M J Morris; Brandon A Gaudiano
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 10.592

3.  Advances in Measurement Invariance and Mean Comparison of Latent Variables: Equivalence Testing and A Projection-Based Approach.

Authors:  Ge Jiang; Yujiao Mai; Ke-Hai Yuan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.