| Literature DB >> 26660678 |
Jessica I Rivera-Perez1, Raul J Cano2, Yvonne Narganes-Storde3, Luis Chanlatte-Baik3, Gary A Toranzos1.
Abstract
For ages, specialists from varying fields have studied the diets of the primeval inhabitants of our planet, detecting diet remains in archaeological specimens using a range of morphological and biochemical methods. As of recent, metagenomic ancient DNA studies have allowed for the comparison of the fecal and gut microbiomes associated to archaeological specimens from various regions of the world; however the complex dynamics represented in those microbial communities still remain unclear. Theoretically, similar to eukaryote DNA the presence of genes from key microbes or enzymes, as well as the presence of DNA from viruses specific to key organisms, may suggest the ingestion of specific diet components. In this study we demonstrate that ancient virus DNA obtained from coprolites also provides information reconstructing the host's diet, as inferred from sequences obtained from pre-Columbian coprolites. This depicts a novel and reliable approach to determine new components as well as validate the previously suggested diets of extinct cultures and animals. Furthermore, to our knowledge this represents the first description of the eukaryotic viral diversity found in paleofaeces belonging to pre-Columbian cultures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26660678 PMCID: PMC4682816 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Description of coprolites analyzed in this study.
| Sample ID | Archaeological section | Quadrant | Depth | Culture | Radiocarbon date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YTA-1 | I-5 | 0.06–0.6m | Saladoid | 335–395 A.D. | 1620–1680 Y.B.P. |
| 2 | YTA-2 | J-22 | 0.8m | Saladoid | 270–385 A.D. | 1630–1745 Y.B.P. |
| 3 | YTA-2 | M-25 | 0.4m | Saladoid | 230–385 A.D. | 1630–1785 Y.B.P. |
| 15 | YTA-2 | H-21 | 1.2m | Saladoid | 230–385 A.D. | 1630–1785 Y.B.P. |
| 8 | SV | Z-W | 1.8m | Huecoid | Circa 245 A.D. | Circa 1770 Y.B.P. |
| 4 | SV | Z-W | 2.0m | Huecoid | 1300–220 A.D. | 715–1795 Y.B.P. |
| 6 | SV | Z-M | 1.2m | Huecoid | Circa 450 A.D. | Circa 1565 Y.B.P. |
| 12 | SV | Z-X | 0.6m | Huecoid | 470–600 A.D. | 1415–1545 Y.B.P. |
| 13 | SV | Z-L | 0.7m | Huecoid | Circa 385 A.D. | Circa 1630 Y.B.P. |
| 16 | SV | Z-37 | 0.2–0.4m | Huecoid | 470 A.D. | 1545 Y.B.P. |
Archaeological sections, quadrants and depths correspond to the area where the coprolite was found in La Hueca excavation site, Vieques.
Nucleotide fragments detected via metagenomic analysis of coprolite DNA.
| Saladoid | Huecoid | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 516,602,540 bp | 681,336,171 bp |
|
| 1,921,436 | 2,435,635 |
|
| 268 ± 63 bp | 279 ± 73 bp |
|
| 59 ± 11% | 53 ± 9% |
|
| 934,579 | 553,487 |
|
| 159,855,500 bp | 369,726,314 bp |
|
| 769,068 | 1,672,958 |
|
| 207 ± 99 bp | 221 ± 100 bp |
Includes base pair (bp) and sequence count before and after running data through quality control filters in MG-RAST software.
Viral sequences detected as components of the Saladoid and Huecoid diets.
| Proviral sequence detected | Corresponding gene identification | Virus host organism | Previous osteological, archaeofaunal and botanical results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Moloney murine leukemia virus | reverse transcriptase |
|
|
| Murine endogenous retrovirus | retrotransposable element ORF2 |
|
| |
| Bat endogenous retrovirus | polymerase polyprotein |
| ND | |
| Tiger frog virus | thymidylate synthase | Frog | ND | |
| Grouper iridovirus | unknown protein |
|
| |
| Avian pox virus | HAL3 domain | Fowl, parrots, and other birds |
| |
| Monkey endogenous retrovirus | H element-like protein | Marmosets | ND | |
|
| ND |
| ||
| ND |
| |||
| ND |
| |||
| ND |
| |||
| ND |
| |||
| Mulberry endogenous retrovirus | polymerase polyprotein, transposon TNT 1–94 |
| ND | |
| ND |
| |||
|
| ND |
| ||
| ND |
| |||
| ND |
| |||
| ND |
|
Viral sequences detected in this study are compared to diet components previously suggested by osteological, archaeofaunal and botanical studies of pre-Columbian cultures in Puerto Rico and Vieques.
aPreviously suggested diet includes observations by the Spanish during there interactions with Caribbean indigenous cultures [20,21], as well as osteological and archaeofaunal analyses of conch shells, teeth and bones obtained from archaeological deposits in Sorcé, Vieques and Puerto Rico [22–25].
bPlants suggested as diet components include those proposed by archaeologists as well as plant remains recently identified by paleobotanists through microscopy analysis [26,27].
cND none detected.
dAlthough these diet components were not detected in this shotgun metagenomic analysis, previous 18S rRNA studies determined their presence in these coprolites [8].