| Literature DB >> 26658279 |
S Fischer1, A Weber1, A Titschert1, C Brenke2, A Kowoll1, W Weber1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms assisted by a novel intra-/extra-aneurysm stent-like implant (pCONus).Entities:
Keywords: Aneurysm; Coil; Device; Intervention; Stent
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26658279 PMCID: PMC5099317 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurointerv Surg ISSN: 1759-8478 Impact factor: 5.836
Figure 1The pCONus device showing its three functional sections: crown, shaft, and detachment zone.
Demographic data and aneurysm characteristics
| Patient no | Initial mRS | Aneurysm location | Dome/neck (mm) | Dome/neck ratio | Ruptured | Discharge mRS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | BA tip | 15/13 | 1.2 | 0 | 3 |
| 2 | 0 | MCA | 10/6 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 3 | BA tip | 11/6 | 1.8 | 1 | 6 |
| 4 | 0 | MCA | 7/5 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | BA tip | 11/5 | 2.2 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | MCA | 6/5 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 4 | BA tip | 8/5 | 1.6 | 1 | 6 |
| 8 | 0 | MCA | 7/5 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | ICA bifurcation | 9/6 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 0 | ICA bifurcation | 10/8 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | Acom | 8/5 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 0 | ICA bifurcation | 7/5 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | 0 | BA tip | 11/6 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 0 | Acom | 8/5 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 4 | BA tip | 12/7 | 1.7 | 1 | 3 |
| 16 | 2 | Acom | 16/10 | 1.6 | 1 | 2 |
| 17 | 1 | BA tip | 8/6 | 1.3 | 1 | 1 |
| 18 | 0 | Acom | 5/4 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 0 | PCA | 12/10 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2 | Acom | 7/6 | 1.2 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 0 | MCA | 7/5 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 0 | MCA | 7/4 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 0 | ICA bifurcation | 5/4 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2 | BA tip | 14/7 | 2.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 25 | 0 | Acom | 4/3 | 1.3 | 0 | 2 |
Acom, anterior communicating artery; BA, basilar artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; PCA, posterior cerebral artery.
Figure 2(A) Incidental finding of a wide-necked middle cerebral artery aneurysm on the left side in a 53-year-old woman (right anterior oblique and caudal view). (B) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the same aneurysm. (C) Positioning of a 4-25-5 mm pCONus device via a 21 inch microcatheter within the aneurysm and along the afferent artery. Correct expansion of the four petals by the arrangement of the radiopaque markers (right anterior oblique and caudal view). (D) Coil occlusion of the aneurysm with a microcatheter placed inside the aneurysm after expansion and before detachment of the pCONus with a small remnant at the caudal circumference (right anterior oblique and caudal view). (E) Complete coil occlusion of the aneurysm after repositioning of the microcatheter followed by detachment of the pCONus device (right anterior oblique and caudal view). (F) Three-month follow-up angiography showing a small neck remnant (right anterior oblique and caudal view).
Figure 3(A) Ruptured basilar tip aneurysm in a 63-year-old man (anteroposterior view with cranial angulation). (B, C) Placement of a 0.021 inch microcatheter inside the aneurysm followed by positioning of a 4-25-10 mm pCONus with its crown inside the aneurysmal orifice. Catheterization through the shaft of the pCONus inside the aneurysm. (D) Displacement of a single coil loop into the origin of the posterior cerebral artery after failed detachment of the pCONus device followed by retrieval without resheathing into the microcatheter. (E)Dissection of the vertebral artery caused by retrieval of the pCONus device without hemodynamic consequences.
Summary of peri- and post-procedural complications
| Patient no | Initial mRS | Aneurysm location | Ruptured | mRS discharge | mRS 30 days | Complication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | BA tip | 0 | 3 | 3 | Ischemic, permanent deficit |
| 17 | 1 | BA tip | 1 | 1 | 0 | Technical failure, no deficit |
| 20 | 2 | Acom | 1 | 2 | 0 | Ischemic, transient deficit |
| 25 | 0 | Acom | 0 | 2 | 0 | Ischemic, transient deficit |
Acom, anterior communicating artery; BA, basilar artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.
Angiographic follow-up results
| Angiographic result | Initial (n=25) | First follow-up (n=21) | Latest follow-up (n=13) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean 0 months | Mean 3.5 months | Mean 15.4 months | |
| Grade 1 | 10 (40.0%) | 7 (33.0%) | 7 (54.0%) |
| Grade 2 | 12 (48.0%) | 10 (48.0%) | 4 (31.0%) |
| Grade 3 | 3 (12.0%) | 4 (19.0%) | 2 (15.0%) |
Intimal hyperplasia of the stented afferent artery has not been observed to date.