Literature DB >> 26657656

Aristolochic acid exposure in Romania and implications for renal cell carcinoma.

Robert J Turesky1, Byeong Hwa Yun1, Paul Brennan2, Dana Mates3, Viorel Jinga4, Patricia Harnden5, Rosamonde E Banks5, Helene Blanche6, Marie-Therese Bihoreau7, Priscilia Chopard2, Louis Letourneau8, G Mark Lathrop8, Ghislaine Scelo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aristolochic acid (AA) is a nephrotoxicant associated with AA nephropathy (AAN) and upper urothelial tract cancer (UUTC). Whole-genome sequences of 14 Romanian cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) recently exhibited mutational signatures consistent with AA exposure, although RCC had not been previously linked with AAN and AA exposure was previously reported only in localised rural areas.
METHODS: We performed mass spectrometric measurements of the aristolactam (AL) DNA adduct 7-(deoxyadenosin-N(6)-yl) aristolactam I (dA-AL-I) in nontumour renal tissues of the 14 Romanian RCC cases and 15 cases from 3 other countries.
RESULTS: We detected dA-AL-I in the 14 Romanian cases at levels ranging from 0.7 to 27 adducts per 10(8) DNA bases, in line with levels reported in Asian and Balkan populations exposed through herbal remedies or food contamination. The 15 cases from other countries were negative.
INTERPRETATION: Although the source of exposure is uncertain and likely different in AAN regions than elsewhere, our results demonstrate that AA exposure in Romania exists outside localised AAN regions and provide further evidence implicating AA in RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26657656      PMCID: PMC4716534          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN) is characterised by chronic renal disease with slow progression to terminal renal failure, and transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUTC) (Debelle ). Under the name of ‘Balkan Endemic Nephropathy' (BEN), it affects parts of Southeastern Europe including some Romanian villages located in the Danube river basin (Stefanovic and Polenakovic, 2009). Aristolochia clematitis is endemic in the region and chronic exposure to aristolochic acid (AA) probably originates from harvesting the herb together with wheat, hence contaminating home-made and locally produced flour ingested by the population (Stefanovic and Polenakovic, 2009). In Taiwan and other Asian countries, AA exposure is attributed to usage of traditional Chinese herbs containing Aristolochia (Debelle ). The carcinogenic effect of AA in the upper urinary tract includes a unique signature of otherwise rare A:T>T:A transversions in the gene TP53 (Grollman ; Chen ) but also at the genome-wide level (Hoang ; Poon ). The mechanism involved in the carcinogenesis has been well described (Sidorenko ; Grollman, 2013). The AA reactive intermediates bind covalently to the DNA, creating bulky DNA lesions on the adenosine base: the deoxyadenosine DNA adducts 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl) aristolactam I (dA-AL-I) and 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl) aristolactam II (dA-AL-II) that partially block DNA replication and give rise to misincorporation of nucleotides (Attaluri ). Our recent whole-genome sequencing study of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) revealed that the AA-induced typical mutational signature was very common in Romanian cases (12 out of 14 cases carried high rates of A:T>T:A transversions), and absent in 80 other cases diagnosed in the United Kingdom, Russian Federation, and Czech Republic (Scelo ). Although AA is the only compound reported thus far to cause this mutation pattern, the finding triggered further investigations because (1) RCC was not known to be associated with exposure to AA; (2) nontumour renal cortices of the 14 Romanian cases did not show typical characteristics of chronic AA exposure, with no sign of dense interstitial fibrosis or tubular atrophy; and (3) the recruiting hospital was located in Bucharest although inhabitants of the BEN area are usually hospitalised in Timisoara or Craiova (two cities of the Western and Southwestern part of Romania; Figure 1).
Figure 1

Map of Romania showing counties affected by the Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN; orange shaded) and counties of residence of the 14 Romanian cases at the time of renal cell carcinoma diagnosis (yellow shaded). Number of cases in each county is indicated. Timisoara and Craiova are the two cities where inhabitants from the BEN area are usually hospitalised (modified from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Romania_counties_blank_big.png).

We sought to determine whether the observed mutational A:T>T:A profile was due to AA exposure by measurement of AL-DNA adducts in the nontumour renal cortex DNA samples of the 14 Romanian cases and 15 cases from other countries. As AL-DNA adducts can persist for more than 20 years in the renal cortex (Schmeiser ), we also investigated the residential history of the Romanian cases.

Materials and methods

Sample selection

Samples were selected for this study from among 94 cases who went through whole-genome sequencing as previously described (Scelo ). All 14 Romanian cases were selected for this study, and 15 additional cases were randomly chosen among 80 cases from the United Kingdom, Russian Federation, and Czech Republic (five cases in each country; Supplementary Table 1). Samples were analysed with the investigator blind to the country of origin of the samples. Written, informed consent was obtained from each participant and the study was approved by the relevant institutional review boards.

DNA isolation from nontumour renal tissue samples

Nontumour renal tissue samples were harvested immediately following nephrectomy for renal cancer. Tissue samples were snap frozen (Russia and United Kingdom) or preserved by immersion into RNAlater (AMBION, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) and frozen (Romania, Czech Republic). All samples were sectioned at IARC with subsequent pathological review undertaken in Leeds (PH) to confirm the absence of tumour cells, and to evaluate the presence of tubules, glomerules, fibrosis, and inflammation (Scelo ). Contiguous sections were also prepared for DNA isolation that was undertaken at CEPH following a semiautomated procedure on Autopure (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and with samples from Romania also having further DNA extracts prepared using a phenol/chloroform protocol at IARC. These additional DNA extractions were undertaken in order to directly compare DNA adduct levels with previous studies that used a phenol/chloroform extraction protocol (Yun ).

Enzymatic digestion of renal tissue DNA

DNA (5 μg) was spiked with [15N5]-dA-AL-I and [15N3]-dA-AL-II, synthesised as previously described (Yun ) at a level of 5 adducts per 108 DNA bases and incubated with DNase I and nuclease P1 for 3.5 h, followed by incubation with phosphodiesterase I and alkaline phosphatase for 18 h at 37 °C. The DNA digest was dried by vacuum centrifugation and reconstituted in 35 μl of 1 : 1 H2O/DMSO. DNA quality and enzymatic digestion efficacy was assessed by HPLC–UV on 10 randomly selected samples (5 from Romania, 2 from Czech Republic, 2 from the United Kingdom, and 1 from Russia) (Yun ). RNA contamination was <2% and digestion efficiency of DNA went to completion for all samples.

Measurement of AL-DNA adducts by UPLC-ESI/MS3

Mass spectrometry was employed to quantify dA-AL-I and dA-AL-II by the stable isotopic dilution method (Yun , 2014) (Supplementary Figure 1). We used a NanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) interfaced with an Advance CaptiveSpray source from Michrom Bioresource (Auburn, CA, USA) and an ion-trap mass spectrometer (LTQ Velos Pro; Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA). A Waters Symmetry C18 trap column (180 μm × 20 mm, 5 μm particle size) was employed for online enrichment of the DNA adducts. A Magic C18 AQ column (0.3 × 150 mm, 3 μm particle size; Michrom Bioresources) was used for chromatography. The DNA adducts were measured in the positive ionisation mode at the MS3 scan stage. The chromatographic and mass spectra acquisition parameters have been described previously (Yun , 2013).

Statistical analysis

We performed a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare the tumour A:T>T:A mutation loads using both the number and the proportion of A:T>T:A mutations in subjects with detectable vs subjects with undetectable adducts (available from Scelo , and reproduced in Supplementary Table 1). To analyse the correlation between the quantity of adducts and the proportion of A:T>T:A mutations in tumours, we fitted a binomial model with a logistic link function of log(dA-AL-I+1) on proportions of A:T>T:A weighted by the number of total mutations (see Supplementary Notes). We calculated odds of A:T>T:A mutations vs other mutation types (odds ratios (ORs)) for 1 log(dA-AL-I) increment and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Assessment of residential history in Romanian cases

County of residence at the time of RCC diagnosis was available for all 14 Romanian cases. Five cases were successfully recontacted and provided a full lifetime residential history. Since the 1980s, all Romanian citizens are allocated with a personal identification code that encodes the county of residence among other information. Before its use became systematic in the 1990s, this could be either the county of residence at the time of birth or the country of residence at the time when the code was allocated to the individual. Although there is no possibility to decipher between the two, we nevertheless used this information (available for 13 cases) in search for evidence that some cases may have lived in the BEN area at some point in their life.

Results

In all 14 Romanian cases, dA-AL-I was detected in DNA samples obtained from the phenol/chloroform extraction method (range: 0.7–26.8 adducts per 108 DNA bases; Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 1) and below the limit of quantification (0.3 adducts per 108 DNA bases) in all 15 non-Romanian cases. Only one Romanian sample was below the detection threshold when using DNA samples obtained from the Autopure extraction protocol. Thus, our data show that dA-AL-I is stable towards tissue storage in RNAlater and largely survives extensive DNA processing. Consistent with previous studies, dA-AL-II was below the limit of quantification in all subjects (Yun ).
Figure 2

Levels of dA-AL-I adducts in 29 nontumour renal cortex samples from renal cell carcinoma cases of the Czech Republic (CZ), United Kingdom (UK), Russian Federation (RU), and Romania (RO). The dot line indicates the limit of quantification (LOQ) value (0.3 adducts per 108 DNA bases). Levels of adducts in Romanian samples were measured in duplicate: on DNA samples extracted with the standard Autopure (Qiagen) protocol, and on DNA samples extracted using a phenol/chloroform protocol. Using the latest samples, cases from Romania harboured dA-AL-I at levels ranging from 0.7 to 27 adducts per 108 DNA bases. The levels of adducts in all other cases were below the LOQ value.

The load of A:T>T:A mutations in tumours was significantly higher in the 14 Romanian samples with detectable dA-AL-I than in the 15 other samples (Wilcoxon rank-sum test P<10−5 when comparing both the numbers and the proportions of A:T>T:A mutations). Similar results were obtained when using the adduct quantities measured on the DNA samples obtained from the Autopure extraction method. The proportion of A:T>T:A mutations was positively associated with the log quantity of dA-AL-I adducts (odds of A:T>T:A mutations vs other mutation types increased by 2.09 for 1 log(dA-AL-I) increment (95% CI: 0.96–4.54, P=0.0605; Figure 3). For two Romanian cases, the histopathological review could not confirm that the sample was from the renal cortex rather than medulla as no glomeruli were present. However, removing these cases from the regression did not substantially change the result (OR=2.18, 95% CI: 0.98–4.84, P=0.0560). Excluding from the analysis the sample with the highest quantity of adducts also led to similar result (OR=2.20, 95% CI: 0.78–6.16), whereas the trend was attenuated when restricting the analysis to the 14 cases with detectable adducts (OR=1.57, 95% CI: 0.45–5.37). Adding potential confounders in the model – namely age, sex, body mass index, history of hypertension and tobacco use, level of fibrosis and inflammation in the renal cortex, and stage and grade of the tumour – also did not change the association (ORs varied from 1.98 to 2.30).
Figure 3

Proportion of A:T>T:A mutations according to the quantity of DNA adducts 7-(deoxyadenosin- The line corresponds to the binomial model fit to the data (log-linear trend P=0.0605). The grey zone indicates the 95% confidence interval around proportions predicted by the model. The arrows point to observed data for the two renal parenchyma samples where glomeruli were not present (when removed from the analysis: P=0.0560). Levels of dA-AL-I were set to zero when below the detection threshold of 0.3 adducts per 108 DNA bases. For Romanian subjects, dA-AL-I levels measured in DNA samples isolated using a phenol/chloroform extraction protocol were used for this analysis. Similar results were obtained using levels measured in DNA extracted using a standard Autopure (Qiagen) protocol.

None of the 14 cases lived in the BEN area at the time of diagnosis (Figure 1). Among five cases with available lifetime residential history, none ever lived in the BEN area. All five had however moved from rural to urban areas. Two cases had lived in counties closed to the BEN area, although both of them were on the lower range of dA-AL-I (0.82 and 2.81 adducts per 108 DNA bases). In addition, counties of the BEN area were not found in any of the 14 personal identification codes.

Discussion

In all 14 Romanian cases, dA-AL-I was detected at levels similar to those reported in renal cortices of patients with UUTC in Taiwan and the Balkans (Yun ). The absence of dA-AL-II was also consistent with previous studies. The A:T>T:A mutations observed in Romanian tumour samples have yet to be shown to drive the development of cancer, and it remains premature to conclude a causal relationship exists between AA exposure and RCC risk. In particular, although the causal link with UUTC was partly established through the presence of A:T>T:A mutations in the driver gene TP53 (Grollman, 2013), it is unclear whether RCC driver genes are affected as TP53 mutations are rare in RCC and commonly mutated genes did not show the A:T>T:A transversions (Scelo ). Whole-exome sequencing of eight RCC cases from endemic AAN regions in Croatia also showed the AA signature in a subset of cases but failed to identify specific driver genes (Jelakovic ). Our results leave no doubt that exposure to AA occurs in Romania outside of the described endemic AAN regions. The findings reaffirm previous observations that the dA-AL-I adduct in renal cortex can serve as a biomarker of exposure to AA (Grollman, 2013; Schmeiser ). As dA-AL-I is a highly persistent lesion, we could not however determine the timing or the source(s) of exposure. As contamination of industrially produced flour with Aristolochia sp. seeds is unlikely, the use of traditional therapeutic remedies containing the plant should be urgently investigated as potential contributors. The medical use of Aristolochia sp. is allowed by the current Romanian legislation (Gluhovschi ), and traditional remedies have been gaining popularity with the increase of alternative/homeopathic medicine shops; studies should be planned to investigate the consumption in the population, and compare levels between kidney cancer cases, chronic kidney disease cases, and healthy individuals. If AA is a cause of RCC, public awareness of AA will have implications for RCC prevention in other parts of the world where herbal remedies containing AA is prevalent.
  17 in total

1.  Renal cell carcinomas of chronic kidney disease patients harbor the mutational signature of carcinogenic aristolochic acid.

Authors:  Bojan Jelaković; Xavier Castells; Karla Tomić; Maude Ardin; Sandra Karanović; Jiri Zavadil
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Aristolochic acid nephropathy: Harbinger of a global iatrogenic disease.

Authors:  Arthur P Grollman
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Biomonitoring of aristolactam-DNA adducts in human tissues using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/ion-trap mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Byeong Hwa Yun; Thomas A Rosenquist; Viktoriya Sidorenko; Charles R Iden; Chung-Hsin Chen; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Radha Bonala; Francis Johnson; Kathleen G Dickman; Arthur P Grollman; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Aristolochic acid-associated urothelial cancer in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chung-Hsin Chen; Kathleen G Dickman; Masaaki Moriya; Jiri Zavadil; Viktoriya S Sidorenko; Karen L Edwards; Dmitri V Gnatenko; Lin Wu; Robert J Turesky; Xue-Ru Wu; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Arthur P Grollman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Fifty years of research in Balkan endemic nephropathy: where are we now?

Authors:  Vladisav Stefanović; Momir Polenaković
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2009-04-18

6.  New Approaches for Biomonitoring Exposure to the Human Carcinogen Aristolochic Acid.

Authors:  Byeong Hwa Yun; Viktoriya S Sidorenko; Thomas A Rosenquist; Kathleen G Dickman; Arthur P Grollman; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Mutational signature of aristolochic acid exposure as revealed by whole-exome sequencing.

Authors:  Margaret L Hoang; Chung-Hsin Chen; Viktoriya S Sidorenko; Jian He; Kathleen G Dickman; Byeong Hwa Yun; Masaaki Moriya; Noushin Niknafs; Christopher Douville; Rachel Karchin; Robert J Turesky; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Arthur P Grollman; Kenneth W Kinzler; Thomas A Rosenquist
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Variation in genomic landscape of clear cell renal cell carcinoma across Europe.

Authors:  Ghislaine Scelo; Yasser Riazalhosseini; Liliana Greger; Louis Letourneau; Mar Gonzàlez-Porta; Magdalena B Wozniak; Mathieu Bourgey; Patricia Harnden; Lars Egevad; Sharon M Jackson; Mehran Karimzadeh; Madeleine Arseneault; Pierre Lepage; Alexandre How-Kit; Antoine Daunay; Victor Renault; Hélène Blanché; Emmanuel Tubacher; Jeremy Sehmoun; Juris Viksna; Edgars Celms; Martins Opmanis; Andris Zarins; Naveen S Vasudev; Morag Seywright; Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani; Christine Carreira; Peter J Selby; Jon J Cartledge; Graham Byrnes; Jiri Zavadil; Jing Su; Ivana Holcatova; Antonin Brisuda; David Zaridze; Anush Moukeria; Lenka Foretova; Marie Navratilova; Dana Mates; Viorel Jinga; Artem Artemov; Artem Nedoluzhko; Alexander Mazur; Sergey Rastorguev; Eugenia Boulygina; Simon Heath; Marta Gut; Marie-Therese Bihoreau; Doris Lechner; Mario Foglio; Ivo G Gut; Konstantin Skryabin; Egor Prokhortchouk; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Johan Rung; Guillaume Bourque; Paul Brennan; Jörg Tost; Rosamonde E Banks; Alvis Brazma; G Mark Lathrop
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Lack of recognition by global-genome nucleotide excision repair accounts for the high mutagenicity and persistence of aristolactam-DNA adducts.

Authors:  Victoria S Sidorenko; Jung-Eun Yeo; Radha R Bonala; Francis Johnson; Orlando D Schärer; Arthur P Grollman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  DNA adducts of aristolochic acid II: total synthesis and site-specific mutagenesis studies in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Sivaprasad Attaluri; Radha R Bonala; In-Young Yang; Mark A Lukin; Yujing Wen; Arthur P Grollman; Masaaki Moriya; Charles R Iden; Francis Johnson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Chemical Analysis of DNA Damage.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Pengcheng Wang; Yuxiang Cui; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Aristolochic Acid in the Etiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret L Hoang; Chung-Hsin Chen; Pau-Chung Chen; Nicholas J Roberts; Kathleen G Dickman; Byeong Hwa Yun; Robert J Turesky; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Arthur P Grollman; Kenneth W Kinzler; Thomas A Rosenquist
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Aristolochic acid-associated cancers: a public health risk in need of global action.

Authors:  Samrat Das; Shefali Thakur; Michael Korenjak; Viktoriya S Sidorenko; Felicia Fei-Lei Chung; Jiri Zavadil
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 69.800

Review 4.  Precision medicine from the renal cancer genome.

Authors:  Yasser Riazalhosseini; Mark Lathrop
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Differences in risk factors for molecular subtypes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mark P Purdue; Jongeun Rhee; Lee Moore; Xiaohua Gao; Xuezheng Sun; Erin Kirk; Vladimir Bencko; Vladimir Janout; Dana Mates; David Zaridze; Stacey Petruzella; Abraham Ari Hakimi; William Marston Linehan; Stephen J Chanock; Paul Brennan; Helena Furberg; Melissa Troester; Nathaniel Rothman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 7.316

Review 6.  Balkan endemic nephropathy: an update on its aetiology.

Authors:  Marie Stiborová; Volker M Arlt; Heinz H Schmeiser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 7.  DNA Adducts Formed by Aristolochic Acid Are Unique Biomarkers of Exposure and Explain the Initiation Phase of Upper Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  Marie Stiborová; Volker M Arlt; Heinz H Schmeiser
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Mutational spectra and mutational signatures: Insights into cancer aetiology and mechanisms of DNA damage and repair.

Authors:  David H Phillips
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-24

9.  Applying Tobacco, Environmental, and Dietary-Related Biomarkers to Understand Cancer Etiology and Evaluate Prevention Strategies.

Authors:  Lisa A Peterson; Silvia Balbo; Naomi Fujioka; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht; Sharon E Murphy; Irina Stepanov; Natalia Y Tretyakova; Robert J Turesky; Peter W Villalta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Kidney Cancer.

Authors:  Ghislaine Scelo; Tricia L Larose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.