| Literature DB >> 26657206 |
Manisha Dixit1, Ashutosh Raghuvanshi2, Chandra Prakash Gupta2, Jyoti Kureel1, Mohd Nizam Mansoori1, Priyanka Shukla1, Aijaz A John1, Kavita Singh3, Dipak Purohit2, Pallavi Awasthi2, Divya Singh1, Atul Goel2.
Abstract
We evaluated the bone regeneration and healing effect of Medicarpin (med) in cortical bone defect model that heals by intramembranous ossification. For the study, female Sprague-Dawley rats were ovariectomized and rendered osteopenic. A drill hole injury was generated in mid femoral bones of all the animals. Med treatment was commenced the day after and continued for 15 days. PTH was taken as a reference standard. Fifteen days post-treatment, animals were sacrificed. Bones were collected for histomorphometry studies at the injury site by micro-computed tomography (μCT) and confocal microscopy. RNA and protein was harvested from newly generated bone. For immunohistochemistry, 5μm sections of decalcified femur bone adjoining the drill hole site were cut. By μCT analysis and calcein labeling of newly generated bone it was found that med promotes bone healing and new bone formation at the injury site and was comparable to PTH in many aspects. Med treatment led to increase in the Runx-2 and osteocalcin signals indicating expansion of osteoprogenitors at the injury site as evaluated by qPCR and immunohistochemical localization. It was observed that med promoted bone regeneration by activating canonical Wnt and notch signaling pathway. This was evident by increased transcript and protein levels of Wnt and notch signaling components in the defect region. Finally, we confirmed that med treatment leads to elevated bone healing in pre-osteoblasts by co localization of beta catenin with osteoblast marker alkaline phosphatase. In conclusion, med treatment promotes new bone regeneration and healing at the injury site by activating Wnt/canonical and notch signaling pathways. This study also forms a strong case for evaluation of med in delayed union and non-union fracture cases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26657206 PMCID: PMC4676632 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144541
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primer sequences of various rat genes used for qPCR.
| primer | sequence |
|---|---|
| B CATENIN | F-CATGGGTGGAACACAGCA R-CCCAGTGCACCCTTCAAC |
| GSK-3 BETA | F-ATCAAGGCACATCCTTGGAC R- ACGGCTACACAGTGCGATT |
| Dvl | F-CCTACAAATTCTTCTTCAAGTCTATGG R- CTTGGCATTGTCGTCGAA |
| LRP5 | F-CATCCATGCTGTGGAGGA R-TGTCTCGGGCACAAGGAT |
| FzD | F-TCTCCGTGCTCTACACCGTA R-GGAAGGCCTGCTCATAGAAGT |
| Smad 1 | F-GCAGCCCTTTTCAGATGC R-ATAGGCTGAGAGCCATCCTG |
| Smad 5 | F-GCCTATGGACACAAGCAACA R-AGGCAACAGGCTGAACATCT |
| Smad 8 | F-ACCATTACCGCAGAGTGGAG R-TGAGGGTTGTACTCGCTGTG |
| Jagged 1 | F-CGCCCTCTGAAAAACAGAAC R-ACCCAAGCCACTGTTAAGACA |
| Notch 1 | F-CTGGACCCCATGGACATC R-ACTGTACACACTGCCGGTTG |
| IHH | F-TGCCTCCCAGAACTGAAAGA R-CTGCAGGGAAGGTCATGTTT |
| Smo | F-CAGGAGCTCTCCTTCAGCAT R-CATTGAGTTCAAAAGCCAAACC |
| B Actin | F-CCCGCGAGTACAACCTTCT R-CGTCATCCATGGCGAACT |
Fig 1Med promotes bone regeneration at the drill hole site in Ovx osteopenic rats.
(A) Representative confocal images (100X) of calcein labeling shown in the drill holes of various groups fifteen days after injury. (B) Quantification of the mean intensity of calcein label. (C) Representative 3-D μCT images from the center of the bony hole in various groups. (D) BV/TV, Tb.Th were decreased in the Ovx in comparison to the sham and treatment with med and PTH significantly increased these parameters over the Ovx group. Compared with the sham, BS/BV was increased in Ovx rat and treatment with med and PTH reduced it. N = 7 rats/group; data expressed as mean ±SEM with 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed by one way-ANOVA nonparametric method followed by the Newman–Keuls test of significance using Prism version 3.0 software. c P< 0.001 compjared with Sham + vehicle group; b P< 0.01compared with Sham + vehicle group; a P< 0.05compared with Sham + vehicle group; z P< 0.001 compared with Ovx + vehicle group; y P< 0.01 compared with Ovx + vehicle group; x P< 0.05 compared with Ovx + vehicle group; r P< 0.001 compared with Ovx + 0.5mg/kg med group; p P< 0.05 compared with Ovx + 0.5mg/kg med group; l P< 0.001 compared with Ovx + 1.0mg/kg med group; k P< 0.01 compared with Ovx + 1.0mg/kg med group; j P< 0.05 compared with Ovx + 1.0mg/kg med group; o P< 0.001 compared with Ovx + 5.0mg/kg med group; m P< 0.05 compared with Ovx + 5.0mg/kg med group.
| Sham+vehicle | OVx+ vehicle | OVx +medicarpin (0.5mg/kg) | OVx+medicarpin (1mg/kg) | Ovx+medicarpin (5mg/kg) | Ovx+PTH (10ug/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 163.33±2.60 | 118.66±1.45 | 138±2.08 | 146.66±2.60 | 174±2.88 | 181.66±1.45 |
|
| 41.9±1.33 | 25.99±0.78 | 29.96±0.87 | 34.96± 2.60 | 46.93± 2.88 | 52.3±1.45 |
|
| 458.33±12.73 | 272.33±7.79 | 312.66±5.92 | 435.33±4.09 | 499.66±7.79 | 517.66±5.81 |
|
| 1.016±0.06 | 0.88± 0.05 | 0.99±0.03 | 1.01±0.01 | 1.16±0.05 | 1.23±0.05 |
Values represent mean ± S.E.M. of at least 8 observations in each treatment group
cP<0.001,bP<0.01,aP<0.05 compared to Sham
zP<0.001,yP<0.01,xP<0.05 compared to OVx
rP<0.001,qP<0.01,pP<0.05 compared to OVx+0.5 mg
lP<0.001,kP<0.01,jP<0.05 compared to OVx+1 mg
oP<0.001,nP<0.01,mP<0.05 compared to OVx+5 mg
All other comparisons are statistically non-significant.
Fig 2Med treatment increases the expression of osteogenic markers at the site of new bone regeneration.
(A) mRNA transcript levels of Runx-2, OCN and TGF-β. Data represent three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± SEM with 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA method followed by the Newman–Keuls test of significance using Prism version 3.0 software. ***P< 0.001 compared with Ovx + vehicle group; **P< 0.01compared with Ovx + vehicle group. (B) Med treatment to Ovx rats promotes immunohistochemical localization of Runx-2 and OCN in the area surrounding the drill hole injury area compared to Sham and Ovx control groups.
Fig 3Medicarpin heals cortical bone defects by activating Wnt canonical signaling pathway.
(A) qPCR analysis of Wnt signaling components like β-catenin, GSK-3β, Dvl, Fzd and Lrp5. (B) Western blot analysis and densitometric analyses of phospho and non-phospho β-catenin, GSK-3β and LEF-1. (C) Med treatment to Ovx rats promotes immunohistochemical localization of β-catenin in the area surrounding the drill hole injury area compared to Sham and Ovx control groups and was equivalent to PTH treatment group. Data represent three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± SEM with 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA method followed by the Newman–Keuls test of significance using Prism version 3.0 software. ***P< 0.001 compared with Ovx + vehicle group; **P< 0.01compared with Ovx + vehicle group; *P< 0.05compared with Ovx + vehicle group.
Fig 4Med also activates notch signaling to induce new bone regeneration at the defect site.
(A) qPCR analysis of notch signaling components like Notch-1 and Jagged-1. (B) Western blot analysis and densitometric analyses of Notch-1, Jagged-1 and notch target genes c-myc, p21 and Hes-1. (C) Med treatment to Ovx rats promotes immunohistochemical localization of Notch-1 in the area surrounding the drill hole injury area compared to Sham and Ovx control groups and was equivalent to PTH treatment group. Data represent three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± SEM with 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA method followed by the Newman–Keuls test of significance using Prism version 3.0 software. ***P< 0.001 compared with Ovx + vehicle group; **P< 0.01compared with Ovx + vehicle group; *P< 0.05compared with Ovx + vehicle group.
Fig 5Hematoxylin and eosin staining of newly regenerated bone at the injury site and immunoflourescence analysis of the co localization of β-catenin and ALP in femoral bone sections at the injury site.
Immunofluorescence staining of β-catenin (green) and ALP (red) was performed. Co localization of two molecules is demonstrated in merged yellow image. Cells were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Auto fluorescence images were taken in red and green channel for each panel for normalizing the background.