BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Overproduction of oxalate in patients with primary hyperoxaluria (PH) leads to calcium oxalate deposition in the kidney and ESRD in a substantial number of cases. However, the key determinants for renal outcome remain unclear. Thus, we performed a retrospective analysis to identify predictors for renal outcome among patients with PH participating in the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium (RKSC) PH Registry. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We characterized clinical and laboratory features of patients enrolled in the RKSC PH Registry. We assessed correlation between urinary measures and eGFR at diagnosis by Spearman rank correlation and estimated renal survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. We determined factors associated with renal survival by Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of 409 patients enrolled in the RKSC Registry as of March 2014, we excluded 112 patients who had ESRD at PH diagnosis from analysis. Among the remaining 297 patients, 65% had PH type 1, 12% had type 2, 13% had type 3, and 11% had unclassified PH. Median (25th, 75th percentile) age at PH diagnosis was 8.1 (4.0, 18.2) years with an eGFR of 73.0 (56.4, 97.5) ml/min per 1.73 m(2) and urinary oxalate excretion rate of 1.64 (1.11, 2.44) mmol/1.73 m(2) per 24 hours. During a median follow-up of 3.9 (1.0, 12.8) years, 59 (20%) patients developed ESRD. Urinary oxalate excretion at diagnosis stratified by quartile was strongly associated with incident ESRD (hazard ratio [HR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.4 to 7.9). During follow-up there was a significant association between urinary oxalate quartile (Q) and incident ESRD (Q4 versus Q1: HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.3). This association remained even when adjusted for sex, age, and baseline eGFR (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 10.8). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with PH, higher urinary oxalate excretion is predictive of poor renal outcome.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Overproduction of oxalate in patients with primary hyperoxaluria (PH) leads to calcium oxalate deposition in the kidney and ESRD in a substantial number of cases. However, the key determinants for renal outcome remain unclear. Thus, we performed a retrospective analysis to identify predictors for renal outcome among patients with PH participating in the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium (RKSC) PH Registry. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We characterized clinical and laboratory features of patients enrolled in the RKSC PH Registry. We assessed correlation between urinary measures and eGFR at diagnosis by Spearman rank correlation and estimated renal survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. We determined factors associated with renal survival by Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of 409 patients enrolled in the RKSC Registry as of March 2014, we excluded 112 patients who had ESRD at PH diagnosis from analysis. Among the remaining 297 patients, 65% had PH type 1, 12% had type 2, 13% had type 3, and 11% had unclassified PH. Median (25th, 75th percentile) age at PH diagnosis was 8.1 (4.0, 18.2) years with an eGFR of 73.0 (56.4, 97.5) ml/min per 1.73 m(2) and urinary oxalate excretion rate of 1.64 (1.11, 2.44) mmol/1.73 m(2) per 24 hours. During a median follow-up of 3.9 (1.0, 12.8) years, 59 (20%) patients developed ESRD. Urinary oxalate excretion at diagnosis stratified by quartile was strongly associated with incident ESRD (hazard ratio [HR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.4 to 7.9). During follow-up there was a significant association between urinary oxalate quartile (Q) and incident ESRD (Q4 versus Q1: HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.3). This association remained even when adjusted for sex, age, and baseline eGFR (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 10.8). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with PH, higher urinary oxalate excretion is predictive of poor renal outcome.
Authors: John C Lieske; Carla G Monico; W Scott Holmes; Erik J Bergstralh; Jeffrey M Slezak; Audrey L Rohlinger; Julie B Olson; Dawn S Milliner Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: B Hoppe; C J Danpure; G Rumsby; P Fryer; P R Jennings; N Blau; G Schubiger; T Neuhaus; E Leumann Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Abigail Liebow; Xingsheng Li; Timothy Racie; Julia Hettinger; Brian R Bettencourt; Nader Najafian; Patrick Haslett; Kevin Fitzgerald; Ross P Holmes; David Erbe; William Querbes; John Knight Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Ada Ventzke; Markus Feldkötter; Andrew Wei; Jutta Becker; Bodo B Beck; Bernd Hoppe Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Ellen R Brooks; Bernd Hoppe; Dawn S Milliner; Eduardo Salido; John Rim; Leah M Krevitt; Julie B Olson; Heather E Price; Gulsah Vural; Craig B Langman Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Sushrut S Waikar; Anand Srivastava; Ragnar Palsson; Tariq Shafi; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Kumar Sharma; James P Lash; Jing Chen; Jiang He; John Lieske; Dawei Xie; Xiaoming Zhang; Harold I Feldman; Gary C Curhan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Bernd Hoppe; Patrick Niaudet; Rémi Salomon; Jérôme Harambat; Sally-Anne Hulton; William Van't Hoff; Shabbir H Moochhala; Georges Deschênes; Elisabeth Lindner; Anna Sjögren; Pierre Cochat Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 3.714