Lei He1, Guofeng Xu1, Xiaoliang Fang1, Houwei Lin1, Maosheng Xu1, Yongguo Yu2, Hongquan Geng3. 1. Department of Pediatric Urology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated To Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China. 2. Department of Pediatric Urology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated To Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China. Yuyongguo@xinhuamed.com.cn. 3. Department of Pediatric Urology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated To Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China. Genghongquan@xinhuamed.com.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We analyzed primary hyperoxaluria (PH) genotype and phenotype in Chinese children. Vitamin B6 response in the patients with genetically confirmed PH1 was also studied. METHODS: We, respectively, analyzed 80 children with urinary stones. Sixty-four children were diagnosed with hyperoxaluria. Twenty-one children consented to genetic evaluation (targeted gene panel-based and whole-exome sequencing), and DNA was obtained from the children and both the parents. RESULTS: PH accounted for 57.1% (12/21) of hyperoxaluria cases. We reported 12 PH cases, including 5 PH1, 1 PH2, and 6 PH3 cases; 2 novel mutations in AGXT and GRHPR each and 4 HOGA1 mutations were identified. The mutations in AGXT and GRHPR were c0.1161C>A and c0.551C>A, and c0.370C>T and c0.864_865delTG, respectively. Four HOGA1 mutations, c0.290G>A, c0.110G>A, c0.554C>T and c0.834_834 + 1delinsTT, were not reported previously. The average urine Ox 24 level in the PH patients was 0.91 mmol/1.73 m2. Moreover, the average urine Ox 24 level in the PH1 patients (1.07 mmol/1.73 m2) was higher than that in the PH2 and PH3 patients (0.73 mmol/1.73 m2 and 0.71 mmol/1.73 m2, respectively). The eGFR of the PH1 patients (76.86 mL/min) was lower than that of the PH2 and PH3 patients (132 mL/min and 136 mL/min, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PH incidence was higher than the reported PH incidence in children with urinary stones. Hence, we suggested that genetic examination was necessary for all the children with hyperoxaluria. These novel mutations broaden the range of known gene mutations in PH.
PURPOSE: We analyzed primary hyperoxaluria (PH) genotype and phenotype in Chinese children. Vitamin B6 response in the patients with genetically confirmed PH1 was also studied. METHODS: We, respectively, analyzed 80 children with urinary stones. Sixty-four children were diagnosed with hyperoxaluria. Twenty-one children consented to genetic evaluation (targeted gene panel-based and whole-exome sequencing), and DNA was obtained from the children and both the parents. RESULTS: PH accounted for 57.1% (12/21) of hyperoxaluria cases. We reported 12 PH cases, including 5 PH1, 1 PH2, and 6 PH3 cases; 2 novel mutations in AGXT and GRHPR each and 4 HOGA1 mutations were identified. The mutations in AGXT and GRHPR were c0.1161C>A and c0.551C>A, and c0.370C>T and c0.864_865delTG, respectively. Four HOGA1 mutations, c0.290G>A, c0.110G>A, c0.554C>T and c0.834_834 + 1delinsTT, were not reported previously. The average urine Ox 24 level in the PH patients was 0.91 mmol/1.73 m2. Moreover, the average urine Ox 24 level in the PH1patients (1.07 mmol/1.73 m2) was higher than that in the PH2 and PH3 patients (0.73 mmol/1.73 m2 and 0.71 mmol/1.73 m2, respectively). The eGFR of the PH1patients (76.86 mL/min) was lower than that of the PH2 and PH3 patients (132 mL/min and 136 mL/min, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PH incidence was higher than the reported PH incidence in children with urinary stones. Hence, we suggested that genetic examination was necessary for all the children with hyperoxaluria. These novel mutations broaden the range of known gene mutations in PH.
Authors: Katharina Hopp; Andrea G Cogal; Eric J Bergstralh; Barbara M Seide; Julie B Olson; Alicia M Meek; John C Lieske; Dawn S Milliner; Peter C Harris Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Yasir Ruhayel; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Saeed Dabestani; Steven MacLennan; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Christian Türk; Yuhong Yuan; Thomas Knoll Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Carla G Monico; Sandro Rossetti; Ruth Belostotsky; Andrea G Cogal; Regina M Herges; Barbara M Seide; Julie B Olson; Eric J Bergstrahl; Hugh J Williams; William E Haley; Yaacov Frishberg; Dawn S Milliner Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Emma L Williams; Cecile Acquaviva; Antonio Amoroso; Francoise Chevalier; Marion Coulter-Mackie; Carla G Monico; Daniela Giachino; Tricia Owen; Angela Robbiano; Eduardo Salido; Hans Waterham; Gill Rumsby Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Hoda A Ahmed; Fatina I Fadel; Mohamed A Abdel Mawla; Doaa M Salah; Mohamed Gamal Fathallah; Khalda Amr Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 2.473