Literature DB >> 26655254

Evaluation of the analytical performance of Unicel DXI 800 for the Total 25 (OH) Vitamin D measurements.

Nurgul Ozcan1, Fatma Ucar2, Abdullah Ercan Arzuhal2, Erdem Bulut2, Alpaslan Ozturk2, Mine Taslipinar Yavuz3, Ismail Temel2, Gonul Erden4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the analytical performance of newly developed Access 25(OH) Vitamin D Total assay with Beckman Coulter Unicel DXI 800 and evaluated the agreement between a reference method liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and a chemiluminescence method (LIAISON, DiaSorin). DESIGN AND METHODS: 160 serum samples were included. Deming Regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots were used. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was used to assess the degree of agreement between assays and the reference method.
RESULTS: The CV% values of Unicel DXI 800 for within-run, between-run and between-day were lower than 6%. When compared to LC-MS/MS, the Access 25(OH) Vitamin D Total assay demonstrated an R value of 0.9444 (intercept -0.089, slope 0.951), with an average bias of -2.9%, and the LIAISON 25(OH) Vitamin D Total assay an R value of 0.9405 (intercept -0605, slope 0.924), with an average bias of -13.6%. In comparison with the LIAISON 25(OH) Vitamin D Total assay, the Access 25(OH) Vitamin D Total assay demonstrated an R value of 0.9498 (intercept 0.528, slope 1.029), with an average bias of 1.2%. The agreement with the LC-MS/MS method, based on values of the CCC, was moderate for the Unicel DXI 800 and LIAISON method (0.95, 0.94 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The new, automated Access 25(OH) Vitamin D Total assay showed an acceptable correlation with LC-MS/MS and LIAISON. Both methods moderately achieved to classify the patients according to their vitamin D status. However, we need further standardization of vitamin D assays to enhance the accuracy and comparability.
Copyright © 2015 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  25-OH Vitamin D; DiaSorin LIAISON; Immunoassay; LC–MS/MS; Method comparison; Unicel DXI 800

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26655254     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  5 in total

1.  Relationship between vitamin D status, glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in Brazilians with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Maria Creusa Rolim; Bárbara Mendes Santos; Gildasio Conceição; Paulo Novis Rocha
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.320

2.  Evaluation of new Beckman Coulter 25(OH) Vitamin D assay and potential improvement of clinical interpretation.

Authors:  Özlem Ç Madenci; Asuman Orçun; Zeynep Yildiz; Rana Sirmali; Nazan Tunçbilek; Nihal Yücel; Yusuf Temel; Aycan Bölük
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

3.  Chronic kidney disease is a main confounding factor for 25-vitamin D measurement.

Authors:  Hanna Karla Andrade Guapyassú Machado; Carolina Steller Wagner Martins; Vanda Jorgetti; Rosilene Motta Elias; Rosa Maria Affonso Moysés
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2019-09-26

4.  Assessment of Abbott Architect 25-OH vitamin D assay in different levels of vitamin D.

Authors:  Esin Avci; Süleyman Demir; Diler Aslan; Rukiye Nar; Hande Şenol
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comparison of four routinely used vitamin D automated immunoassays.

Authors:  Jindra Windrichova; Pavel Broz; Radka Fuchsova; Ondrej Topolcan; Ladislav Pecen; Otto Mayer; Radek Kucera
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.402

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.