Literature DB >> 26654982

Exome sequencing explained: a practical guide to its clinical application.

Eleanor G Seaby, Reuben J Pengelly, Sarah Ennis.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing has catapulted healthcare into a revolutionary genomics era. One such technology, whole-exome sequencing, which targets the protein-coding regions of the genome, has proven success in identifying new causal mutations for diseases of previously unknown etiology. With a successful diagnostic rate approaching 25% for rare disease in recent studies, its clinical utility is becoming increasingly popular. However, the interpretation of whole-exome sequencing data requires expertise in genomic informatics and clinical medicine to ensure the accurate and safe reporting of findings back to the bedside. This is challenged by vast amounts of sequencing data harbouring approximately 25 000 variants per sequenced individual. Computational strategies and fastidious filtering frameworks are thus required to extricate candidate variants in a sea of common polymorphisms. Once prioritized, identified variants require intensive scrutiny at a biological level, and require judicious assessment alongside the clinical phenotype. In the final step, all evidence is collated and documented alongside pathogenicity guidelines to produce an exome report that returns to the clinic. This review provides a practical guide for clinicians and genomic informaticians on the clinical application of whole-exome sequencing. We address sequencing capture and methodology, quality control parameters at different stages of sequencing analysis and propose an exome data filtering strategy that includes primary filtering (for the removal of probable benign variants) and secondary filtering for the prioritization of remaining candidates.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  clinical genomics; next-generation sequencing; whole-exome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26654982     DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elv054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics        ISSN: 2041-2649            Impact factor:   4.241


  21 in total

Review 1.  First Responder to Genomic Information: A Guide for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Rapid and accurate interpretation of clinical exomes using Phenoxome: a computational phenotype-driven approach.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Batsal Devkota; Perry Evans; Xiaonan Zhao; Samuel W Baker; Rojeen Niazi; Kajia Cao; Michael A Gonzalez; Pushkala Jayaraman; Laura K Conlin; Bryan L Krock; Matthew A Deardorff; Nancy B Spinner; Ian D Krantz; Avni B Santani; Ahmad N Abou Tayoun; Mahdi Sarmady
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  De novo variants in FBXO11 cause a syndromic form of intellectual disability with behavioral problems and dysmorphisms.

Authors:  Sandra Jansen; Ilse M van der Werf; A Micheil Innes; Alexandra Afenjar; Pankaj B Agrawal; Ilse J Anderson; Paldeep S Atwal; Ellen van Binsbergen; Marie-José van den Boogaard; Lucia Castiglia; Zeynep H Coban-Akdemir; Anke van Dijck; Diane Doummar; Albertien M van Eerde; Anthonie J van Essen; Koen L van Gassen; Maria J Guillen Sacoto; Mieke M van Haelst; Ivan Iossifov; Jessica L Jackson; Elizabeth Judd; Charu Kaiwar; Boris Keren; Eric W Klee; Jolien S Klein Wassink-Ruiter; Marije E Meuwissen; Kristin G Monaghan; Sonja A de Munnik; Caroline Nava; Charlotte W Ockeloen; Rosa Pettinato; Hilary Racher; Tuula Rinne; Corrado Romano; Victoria R Sanders; Rhonda E Schnur; Eric J Smeets; Alexander P A Stegmann; Asbjørg Stray-Pedersen; David A Sweetser; Paulien A Terhal; Kristian Tveten; Grace E VanNoy; Petra F de Vries; Jessica L Waxler; Marcia Willing; Rolph Pfundt; Joris A Veltman; R Frank Kooy; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Bert B A de Vries
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Accurate Prediction of Protein Sequences for Proteogenomics Data Integration.

Authors:  Yanick Paco Hagemeijer; Victor Guryev; Peter Horvatovich
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Significance and limitations of the use of next-generation sequencing technologies for detecting mutational signatures.

Authors:  Ammal Abbasi; Ludmil B Alexandrov
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-08-05

6.  Novel findings with reassessment of exome data: implications for validation testing and interpretation of genomic data.

Authors:  Kristin McDonald Gibson; Addie Nesbitt; Kajia Cao; Zhenming Yu; Elizabeth Denenberg; Elizabeth DeChene; Qiaoning Guan; Elizabeth Bhoj; Xiangdong Zhou; Bo Zhang; Chao Wu; Holly Dubbs; Alisha Wilkens; Livija Medne; Emma Bedoukian; Peter S White; Jeffrey Pennington; Minjie Luo; Laura Conlin; Dimitri Monos; Mahdi Sarmady; Eric Marsh; Elaine Zackai; Nancy Spinner; Ian Krantz; Matt Deardorff; Avni Santani
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Congenital Cataract and Its Genetics: The Era of Next-Generation Sequencing

Authors:  Hande Taylan Şekeroğlu; Gülen Eda Utine
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-29

8.  Improving diagnostics of rare genetic diseases with NGS approaches.

Authors:  Mateja Vinkšel; Karin Writzl; Aleš Maver; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-01-15

9.  Diagnostic Yield and Cost-Effectiveness of "Dynamic" Exome Analysis in Epilepsy with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Tertiary-Center Experience in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Costanza Varesio; Simone Gana; Alessia Asaro; Elena Ballante; Raffaella Fiamma Cabini; Elena Tartara; Michela Bagnaschi; Ludovica Pasca; Marialuisa Valente; Simona Orcesi; Cristina Cereda; Pierangelo Veggiotti; Renato Borgatti; Enza Maria Valente; Valentina De Giorgis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25

10.  Noninvasive prenatal exome sequencing diagnostic utility limited by sequencing depth and fetal fraction.

Authors:  Dayne L Filer; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Alicia Brandt; Kelly L Gilmore; Bradford C Powell; Jonathan S Berg; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.