Molly E Ireland1, H Andrew Schwartz2, Qijia Chen3, Lyle H Ungar2, Dolores Albarracín4. 1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania. 3. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania. 4. Psychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Future orientation promotes health and well-being at the individual level. Computerized text analysis of a dataset encompassing billions of words used across the United States on Twitter tested whether community-level rates of future-oriented messages correlated with lower human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) rates and moderated the association between behavioral risk indicators and HIV. METHOD: Over 150 million tweets mapped to U.S. counties were analyzed using 2 methods of text analysis. First, county-level HIV rates (cases per 100,000) were regressed on aggregate usage of future-oriented language (e.g., will, gonna). A second data-driven method regressed HIV rates on individual words and phrases. RESULTS: Results showed that counties with higher rates of future tense on Twitter had fewer HIV cases, independent of strong structural predictors of HIV such as population density. Future-oriented messages also appeared to buffer health risk: Sexually transmitted infection rates and references to risky behavior on Twitter were associated with higher HIV prevalence in all counties except those with high rates of future orientation. Data-driven analyses likewise showed that words and phrases referencing the future (e.g., tomorrow, would be) correlated with lower HIV prevalence. CONCLUSION: Integrating big data approaches to text analysis and epidemiology with psychological theory may provide an inexpensive, real-time method of anticipating outbreaks of HIV and etiologically similar diseases. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Future orientation promotes health and well-being at the individual level. Computerized text analysis of a dataset encompassing billions of words used across the United States on Twitter tested whether community-level rates of future-oriented messages correlated with lower human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) rates and moderated the association between behavioral risk indicators and HIV. METHOD: Over 150 million tweets mapped to U.S. counties were analyzed using 2 methods of text analysis. First, county-level HIV rates (cases per 100,000) were regressed on aggregate usage of future-oriented language (e.g., will, gonna). A second data-driven method regressed HIV rates on individual words and phrases. RESULTS: Results showed that counties with higher rates of future tense on Twitter had fewer HIV cases, independent of strong structural predictors of HIV such as population density. Future-oriented messages also appeared to buffer health risk: Sexually transmitted infection rates and references to risky behavior on Twitter were associated with higher HIV prevalence in all counties except those with high rates of future orientation. Data-driven analyses likewise showed that words and phrases referencing the future (e.g., tomorrow, would be) correlated with lower HIV prevalence. CONCLUSION: Integrating big data approaches to text analysis and epidemiology with psychological theory may provide an inexpensive, real-time method of anticipating outbreaks of HIV and etiologically similar diseases. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Dolores Albarracín; Jeffrey C Gillette; Allison N Earl; Laura R Glasman; Marta R Durantini; Moon-Ho Ho Journal: Psychol Bull Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 17.737
Authors: Katriina L Whitaker; Anna Good; Anne Miles; Katie Robb; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2011-05-30 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Karin Elizabeth Tobin; Satoko Janet Kuramoto; Melissa Ann Davey-Rothwell; Carl Asher Latkin Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Megan L Robbins; Elizabeth S Focella; Shelley Kasle; Ana María López; Karen L Weihs; Matthias R Mehl Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: James MacKillop; Michael T Amlung; Lauren R Few; Lara A Ray; Lawrence H Sweet; Marcus R Munafò Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Robin Stevens; Stephen Bonett; Jacqueline Bannon; Deepti Chittamuru; Barry Slaff; Safa K Browne; Sarah Huang; José A Bauermeister Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Brenda Curtis; Salvatore Giorgi; Anneke E K Buffone; Lyle H Ungar; Robert D Ashford; Jessie Hemmons; Dan Summers; Casey Hamilton; H Andrew Schwartz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240