Literature DB >> 26650674

Toward Independence: Resubmission Rate of Unfunded National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01 Research Grant Applications Among Early Stage Investigators.

Josephine E A Boyington1, Melissa D Antman, Katherine C Patel, Michael S Lauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current, budget-driven low rate of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for biomedical research has raised concerns about new investigators' ability to become independent scientists and their willingness to persist in efforts to secure funding. The authors sought to determine resubmission rates for unfunded National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) early stage investigator (ESI) independent research grant (R01) applications and to identify resubmission predictors.
METHOD: The authors used a retrospective cohort study design and retrieved applications submitted in fiscal years 2010-2012 from NIH electronic research administrative sources. They defined ESI applicants as those who have received no prior R01 (or equivalent) funding and are within 10 years of completion of their terminal research degree or medical residency training. ESI applications at the NHLBI were eligible for special funding consideration if they scored above, but within 10 points of, the payline. The primary outcome was application resubmission after failing to secure funding with the first R01 submission.
RESULTS: Over half of the unfunded applications were resubmitted. Some of these were discussed and "percentiled." Among percentiled applications, the only significant predictor of resubmission was the percentile score. Over half (59%) of the ESI R01 grants funded by NHLBI in fiscal years 2010-2012 had percentile scores above but within 10 points of the NHLBI payline, and benefited from the special funding considerations.
CONCLUSIONS: The only independent predictor of resubmission of NHLBI ESI R01 grant applications was percentile score; applicant demographics and institutional factors were not predictive of resubmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26650674      PMCID: PMC4811707          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  More time for research: fund people not projects.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications.

Authors:  Timothy J Ley; Barton H Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Enabling scientific innovation.

Authors:  James S Langer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.

Authors:  Donna K Ginther; Walter T Schaffer; Joshua Schnell; Beth Masimore; Faye Liu; Laurel L Haak; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  NIH research funding and early career physician scientists: continuing challenges in the 21st century.

Authors:  Howard H Garrison; Anne M Deschamps
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  A Perspective on Promoting Diversity in the Biomedical Research Workforce: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's PRIDE Program.

Authors:  Josephine E A Boyington; Nita J Maihle; Treva K Rice; Juan E Gonzalez; Caryl A Hess; Levi H Makala; Donna B Jeffe; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Dabeeru C Rao; Victor G Dávila-Román; Betty S Pace; Girardin Jean-Louis; Mohamed Boutjdir
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists.

Authors:  Travis A Hoppe; Aviva Litovitz; Kristine A Willis; Rebecca A Meseroll; Matthew J Perkins; B Ian Hutchins; Alison F Davis; Michael S Lauer; Hannah A Valantine; James M Anderson; George M Santangelo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Sustaining Independent Careers in Vision Research: Demographics and Success in Second R01 Attainment Among Clinician-Scientists from 1985 to 2019.

Authors:  Elaine A Liu; Sophia Y Wang; Rajesh C Rao
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness.

Authors:  Stephen A Gallo; Karen B Schmaling; Lisa A Thompson; Scott R Glisson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort.

Authors:  Jamie Mihoko Doyle; Michael T Baiocchi; Michaela Kiernan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.