Literature DB >> 26648666

Significance of Reflux Abolition at the Saphenofemoral Junction in Connection with Stripping and Ablative Methods.

Cestmir Recek1.   

Abstract

Saphenous reflux interferes with the physiological decrease in pressure and induces ambulatory venous hypertension. Elimination of reflux is achieved by flush ligation at the incompetent saphenofemoral junction and stripping of the great saphenous vein, which is the basis of the conventional surgical therapy. Endovenous ablative methods substitute stripping by thermal of chemical destruction of the saphenous trunk; they usually refrain from saphenofemoral junction ligation. Short-term and medium-term results up to 5 years, achieved after endovenous ablation without high ligation, are comparable with those after conventional surgery, which questioned the necessity to ligate the incompetent saphenofemoral junction. Nevertheless, clinical symptoms caused by recurrent reflux occur as a rule not earlier than 8 to 10 years after efficient abolition of reflux. Consequently, randomized studies with long-term follow-ups exceeding 10 years are necessary for trustworthy assessment whether it is justified to abstain from saphenofemoral junction ligation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endovascular procedure; endovenous ablation; greater saphenous vein; lower extremity; radiofrequency ablation; varicose veins; vein reflux

Year:  2015        PMID: 26648666      PMCID: PMC4656171          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  76 in total

1.  Static and dynamic pressures in superficial and deep veins of the lower extremity in man.

Authors:  I C HOJENSGARD; H STURUP
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1952

Review 2.  Pathogenesis and etiology of recurrent varicose veins.

Authors:  Maresa Brake; Chung S Lim; Amanda C Shepherd; Joseph Shalhoub; Alun H Davies
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy versus surgery for the incompetent great saphenous vein.

Authors:  N Shadid; R Ceulen; P Nelemans; C Dirksen; J Veraart; G W Schurink; P van Neer; J vd Kley; E de Haan; A Sommer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reflux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein.

Authors:  R Fischer; N Linde; C Duff; C Jeanneret; J G Chandler; P Seeber
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: a potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques.

Authors:  Geza Mozes; Manju Kalra; Michele Carmo; Lori Swenson; Peter Gloviczki
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up.

Authors:  F Lurie; D Creton; B Eklof; L S Kabnick; R L Kistner; O Pichot; C Sessa; S Schuller-Petrovic
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.069

7.  The role of angiogenic growth factors in arteriogenesis.

Authors:  Wilma Schierling; Kerstin Troidl; Christian Troidl; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Wolfgang Schaper; Inka K Eitenmüller
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.934

8.  Causes of varicose vein recurrence: late results of a randomized controlled trial of stripping the long saphenous vein.

Authors:  Rebecca J Winterborn; Chris Foy; Jonothan J Earnshaw
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Fate of the great saphenous vein following endovenous laser ablation: does re-canalisation mean recurrence?

Authors:  N S Theivacumar; D Dellagrammaticas; R J Darwood; A I D Mavor; M J Gough
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 7.069

10.  Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  Anke A M Biemans; Michael Kockaert; George P Akkersdijk; Renate R van den Bos; Marianne G R de Maeseneer; Philip Cuypers; Theo Stijnen; Martino H A Neumann; Tamar Nijsten
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of residual stumps 12 months after saphenectomy without high ligation of the saphenofemoral junction.

Authors:  Giovanna Golin Guarinello; Francisco Eduardo Coral; Jorge Rufino Ribas Timi; Sarah Folly Machado
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2021-07-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.