Literature DB >> 23769603

Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins.

Anke A M Biemans1, Michael Kockaert, George P Akkersdijk, Renate R van den Bos, Marianne G R de Maeseneer, Philip Cuypers, Theo Stijnen, Martino H A Neumann, Tamar Nijsten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many case series have been published on treatments of varicose veins, but comparative randomized controlled trials remain sparse.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the anatomic success rate, frequency of major complications, and quality-of-life improvement of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), and conventional surgery (CS), after 1-year follow-up.
METHODS: A total of 240 consecutive patients with primary symptomatic great saphenous vein reflux were randomized to EVLA, UGFS, or CS, consisting of high ligation and short stripping. Primary outcome was anatomic success defined as obliteration or absence of the treated vein on ultrasound examination after 1 year. Secondary outcomes were complications, improvement of the "C" class of the CEAP classification, and improvement of disease-specific (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire) and general (EuroQol 5) quality-of-life scores.
RESULTS: More than 80% of the study population was classified as C2 or C3 venous disease. After 1 year, the anatomic success rate was highest after EVLA (88.5%), followed by CS (88.2%) and UGFS (72.2%) (P < .001). The complication rate was low and comparable between treatment groups. All groups showed significant (P < .001) improvement of EuroQol 5 and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire scores after therapy; 84.3% of all treated patients showed an improvement of the "C" of the CEAP classification.
CONCLUSIONS: After 1-year follow-up, EVLA is as effective as CS and superior to UGFS according to occlusion on ultrasound duplex. Quality of life improves after treatment in all groups significantly.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769603     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  22 in total

Review 1.  Significance of Reflux Abolition at the Saphenofemoral Junction in Connection with Stripping and Ablative Methods.

Authors:  Cestmir Recek
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-03-23

Review 2.  The management of varicose veins.

Authors:  Fan Lin; Shiyi Zhang; Yan Sun; Shiyan Ren; Peng Liu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

3.  Utility of the Ginza forceps for superficial phlebectomy during endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein.

Authors:  Takeshi Baba; Takao Ohki; Yuji Kanaoka; Koji Maeda; Kenjirou Kaneko; Masayuki Hara; Kota Shukuzawa; Soichiro Fukushima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Role of interventional radiologists in the management of lower extremity venous insufficiency.

Authors:  Rulon L Hardman; Paul J Rochon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  [Guidelines for sclerotherapy of varicose veins : S2k guideline of the German Society of Phlebology (DGP) in cooperation with the following professional associations: DDG, DGA, DDG, BVP. German Version].

Authors:  E Rabe; F X Breu; I Flessenkämper; H Gerlach; S Guggenbichler; B Kahle; R Murena; S Reich-Schupke; T Schwarz; M Stücker; E Valesky; S Werth; F Pannier
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 6.  Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence.

Authors:  Jade Whing; Sandip Nandhra; Craig Nesbitt; Gerard Stansby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-11

7.  Pain Outcomes Following Mechanochemical Ablation vs Cyanoacrylate Adhesive for the Treatment of Primary Truncal Saphenous Vein Incompetence: The MOCCA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amjad Belramman; Roshan Bootun; Tjun Yip Tang; Tristan R A Lane; Alun H Davies
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 16.681

8.  Fluoroscopy-guided endovenous sclerotherapy using a microcatheter prior to endovenous laser ablation: comparison between liquid and foam sclerotherapy for varicose tributaries.

Authors:  Sang Woo Park; Ik Jin Yun; Jae Joon Hwang; Song Am Lee; Jun Seok Kim; Hyun Keun Chee; Il Soo Chang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 9.  Management of Lower Extremity Pain from Chronic Venous Insufficiency: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Vwaire Orhurhu; Robert Chu; Katherine Xie; Ghislain N Kamanyi; Bisola Salisu; Mariam Salisu-Orhurhu; Ivan Urits; Rachel J Kaye; Jamal Hasoon; Omar Viswanath; Aaron J Kaye; Jay Karri; Zwade Marshall; Alan D Kaye; Dua Anahita
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2021-03-11

10.  Assessment of residual stumps 12 months after saphenectomy without high ligation of the saphenofemoral junction.

Authors:  Giovanna Golin Guarinello; Francisco Eduardo Coral; Jorge Rufino Ribas Timi; Sarah Folly Machado
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.