INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) compromises the health and routine of the patient. On the fifth stage of CKD, the patient becomes eligible to start renal replacement therapy: hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) or kidney transplantation. The type of CKD treatment is essential to improving quality of life of the patient. OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of life of CKD stage 5 patients who perform HD and home PD. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with data collection, by convenience, through the application of socioeconomic and KDQOL SF-36 questionnaires in HD and PD patients of the Pro-Renal Foundation and satellite clinics in Curitiba-PR. RESULTS: The sample was 338 patients, 222 HD and 116 PD. Average age: 54.4 years for HD group (± 15.28) and 58.00 for the DP group (± 13.99). The variables: work status (p < 0.05), encouragement by dialysis staff (p < 0.01) and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) were in favor of DP; while physical functioning (p < 0.05) and emotional function (p < 0.01) were to HD. CONCLUSION: Objectively, PD was more favorable regarding quality of life, for the large number of items with significant results when compared to HD. However, the two variables of greatest significance found in HD (physical functioning and emotional functioning) ended up having a much greater impact on well-being and daily-life of the patient in the environment external to the clinic than those who were higher in DP, making HD the most favorable for patient quality of life.
INTRODUCTION:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) compromises the health and routine of the patient. On the fifth stage of CKD, the patient becomes eligible to start renal replacement therapy: hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) or kidney transplantation. The type of CKD treatment is essential to improving quality of life of the patient. OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of life of CKD stage 5 patients who perform HD and home PD. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with data collection, by convenience, through the application of socioeconomic and KDQOL SF-36 questionnaires in HD and PDpatients of the Pro-Renal Foundation and satellite clinics in Curitiba-PR. RESULTS: The sample was 338 patients, 222 HD and 116 PD. Average age: 54.4 years for HD group (± 15.28) and 58.00 for the DP group (± 13.99). The variables: work status (p < 0.05), encouragement by dialysis staff (p < 0.01) and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) were in favor of DP; while physical functioning (p < 0.05) and emotional function (p < 0.01) were to HD. CONCLUSION: Objectively, PD was more favorable regarding quality of life, for the large number of items with significant results when compared to HD. However, the two variables of greatest significance found in HD (physical functioning and emotional functioning) ended up having a much greater impact on well-being and daily-life of the patient in the environment external to the clinic than those who were higher in DP, making HD the most favorable for patient quality of life.
Authors: A van Eck van der Sluijs; A A Bonenkamp; F W Dekker; A C Abrahams; B C van Jaarsveld Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Anna A Bonenkamp; Anita van Eck van der Sluijs; Tiny Hoekstra; Marianne C Verhaar; Frans J van Ittersum; Alferso C Abrahams; Brigit C van Jaarsveld Journal: Kidney Med Date: 2020-02-11
Authors: Paul N Bennett; Wael F Hussein; Kimberly Matthews; Mike West; Erick Smith; Marc Reiterman; Grace Alagadan; Bryan Shragge; Jignesh Patel; Brigitte M Schiller Journal: Kidney Med Date: 2020-03-17
Authors: Miquel Sitjar-Suñer; Rosa Suñer-Soler; Afra Masià-Plana; Emilia Chirveches-Pérez; Carme Bertran-Noguer; Concepció Fuentes-Pumarola Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 3.390