Literature DB >> 32089846

Relationship between spiritual health and hope by dietary adherence in haemodialysis patients in 2018.

Motahareh Musavi Ghahfarokhi1, Sara Mohammadian2, Bahar Mohammadi Nezhad2, Maryam Kiarsi2.   

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to determine the relationship between spiritual well-being and hope through adherence to diet in haemodialysis patients referred to the dialysis centre. Design: This research was a cross-sectional study of a descriptive-analytical type conducted on 120 patients undergoing haemodialysis in a haemodialysis centre of a hospital affiliated to Dezful University of Medical Sciences using the census method. Method: The data were collected using a questionnaire and through the laboratory information included in the patient's records. The data collection tools were a demographic information questionnaire, the Ellison and Paloutzian spiritual well-being scale (SWBS), the Hope-Herth questionnaire and the objective laboratory criteria (phosphorus, potassium). This included the weight difference between the two dialysis sessions from the record to examine the adherence to the diet.
Results: The results indicate there to be a significant relationship between hope and spiritual well-being with the objective criteria of the adherence to the diet in dialysis patients (p = .001).
© 2019 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence; haemodialysis; hope; nurses; nursing; spiritual well‐being

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 32089846      PMCID: PMC7024621          DOI: 10.1002/nop2.412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Open        ISSN: 2054-1058


INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease, which is also known as chronic kidney failure, is regarded as one of the most chronic, progressive and life‐threatening diseases in humans, which has become increasingly prevalent the world (Aghighi et al., 2008;Krueger, 2009). This chronic disease is a stage in kidney failure where the nephron function reaches <50% of its normal capacity. If the kidney function capacity reaches <10%‐15% of their normal capacity, then they are considered to be in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD). In this stage of the disease, some therapies such as dialysis for the two main types of haemodialysis and peritoneal and kidney transplantation are essential for survival (Gonçalves et al., 2015). Haemodialysis is the most commonly used therapy (more than 90%) in patients with ESRD (Ghods & Savaj, 2006). Currently, there are more than 13,000 dialysis patients in Iran and the rate of these patients increases yearly by 15%, among which 1,500 are dying from the complications of dialysis (Baraz‐Pardenjani, Mohammadi, & Boroumand, 2008; Shafipour, Jafari, Shafipour, & Nasiri, 2010). By increasing the access to dialysis, hundreds of thousands of patients with end‐stage renal failure have a chance to survive, although where this therapy fails to change the course of the disease and it is associated with many physical, psychological and social stresses (Hasanzadeh, Shamsoddini, Moonaghi, & Ebrahimzadeh, 2011). By starting dialysis, different needs and changes may take place in the lives of the patients. Dialysis patients have limitations and adherence requirements concerning certain therapeutic regimens such as fluid and dietary restrictions (low salt, low potassium, low phosphorus, etc.), the proper and real‐time consumption of prescription drugs and regular attendance of the dialysis sessions to maintain their health and to prevent cardiovascular complications (Khalili, Eslami, Farajzadegan, & Hassanzadeh, 2011;Nasiri, 2012). This set of behaviours is described as the adherence to treatment behaviours in dialysis patients (Rambod, Peyrovi, Sareban, & Mohebbi Nubandeghani, 2008). In these patients, the levels of phosphorus and potassium are among the criteria when adopting the diet, due to the effect of diet and interdialytic weight gain, which indicates the recommended amount of salt and fluid consumption. Adherence to the diet and the observation of the restrictions on fluid consumption has led to a reduction in the signs of disease and drug side effects. This plays an influential role in improving their quality of life and it also increases the life expectancy of patients (Durose, Holdsworth, Watson, & Przygrodzkz, 2004). However, the imperfection in adherence to treatments in haemodialysis patients has led to worse illness, increased mortality and costs, in addition to more responsibilities and workload for healthcare providers (Unruh, Evans, Fink, Powe, & Meyer, 2005). The deviance and failure of chronic patients to observe and adhere to dietary restrictions are considered among the major concerns of the healthcare and treatment teams (Hasanzadeh et al., 2011). Kim, Evangelista Lorraine, Phillips Linda, Pavlish, and Kopple Joel (2010) reported the rate of non‐adherence to the diet in haemodialysis patients of approximately 2.1%–4.82%. The adherence of patients to the diet is influenced by a variety of factors, including individual attitude and beliefs in treatment, personality and psychological traits, patient information level related to diet, socio‐economic status, cultural differences and the patient's ability to tolerate low consumption of water and fluids (Takaki & Yano, 2006). Since chronic renal failure is a part of the chronic and complex disease, patients experience problems such as daily suffering, dependence on others and dialysis machines and consequently, should undergo continuous diet‐therapy and medication. Therefore, the disease involves a large number of mental instabilities such as anxiety and depression, personality disorder (Theofilou, 2011), sexual function, self‐confidence, beliefs and patient values (Theofilou, 2012b). Further, a spiritual crisis appears in these individuals following the disorder in the patients and in the mechanisms of compliance and communication (Theofilou, 2012a). Some studies have suggested that the spirituality dimension is considered as an essential requirement for these patients (McCord et al., 2004;Puchalski et al., 2011). Spiritual well‐being is regarded as one of the most important concepts in patients dealing with problems and stresses caused by the disease, which plays a crucial role in arousing the sense of identity, perfection, satisfaction, happiness, beauty, love, respect, positive attitude, inner balance and purpose in life (Marashian & Esmaili, 2012). Spiritual well‐being is known as the latest dimension after the health dimensions such as physical, social and psychological ones, which leads to the integration of other dimensions (Assarroudi, Jalilvand, Oudi, & Akaberi, 2013). This aspect has two existential and religious dimensions. The former is related to the attempt to understand the meaning and purpose of life, while the latter refers to the relationship with a superior power (Dehbashi, Sabzevari, & Tirgari, 2014). Hope is defined as having a positive expectation about the future and a coping strategy for adaptation to dialysis and kidney failure (Allahbakhshian, Jaffarpour, Parvizy, & Haghani, 2010). Further, hope is a cognitive process related to goals and provides the ground for achieving goals (Billington, Simpson, Unwin, Bray, & Giles, 2008). Having hope is a symptom of mental health and its enhancing makes it possible to provide the ground for accepting medical and caring about education from the patient's side (Tutton, Seers, & Langstaff, 2012). Based on the studies conducted by Yi et al. (2006), health and hope are some of the most significant factors in life, which provide the compatibility with the disease, reduce mental health and improve quality of life and psychosocial well‐being. Schiavon, Marchetti, Gurgel, Busnello, and Reppold (2016) assumed individuals with greater optimism and hope seek to engage in healthier behaviours, which greatly contributes to chronic disease treatment, regardless of their clinical status. On the other hand, despair and hopelessness and non‐adherence to the treatment play an important role in chronic diseases and are still a challenge in the medical and social professions (Dulmen et al., 2007).

Aim

The non‐adherence to the diet in dialysis patients has led researchers to explore relevant factors affecting its adherence. Identifying the factors related to the non‐adherence to the diet is the first step in determining patients at risk of non‐adherence and recognizing related factors (Lurie et al., 2000). The present study seeks to identify the relationship between spiritual well‐being and hope with diet‐adherence in haemodialysis patients referred to the dialysis centre, in Dezful County. Furthermore, this research evaluates diet‐adherence and the factors affecting it. This plays an influential role in promoting health, preventing deterioration and reducing mortality of patients.

METHOD

Sampling procedure

The statistical population included the patients undergoing haemodialysis in the haemodialysis centre of the hospital affiliated to the Dezful University of Medical Sciences. The sampling process was performed by the census method according to the previous studies and the number of dialysis patients in the centre. The study population involved 140 patients treated with dialysis at the haemodialysis centre; 15 patients were excluded due to being of a very high or low age or having a lack of ability to communicate their responses to the questionnaires. Furthermore, five patients expressed reluctance and did not participate in the study. Finally, 120 patients who met the criteria for entering the study were selected. The inclusion criteria were those who consented to participate in the study, who had at least 3 months of haemodialysis history, who were aged over 18, who have 3–4 hr of dialysis per session at least twice weekly. They also had to have the ability to understand questions or to read and write. The exclusion criteria included any mental or cognitive disorder and dissatisfaction concerning participating in the study. If the patient was not able to fill out the questionnaire because of a lack of literacy or the inability to write, then the questions were read and explained to the patient by the researchers' colleagues.

Data collection procedure

The present study is an analytical‐descriptive and cross‐sectional study. The data were collected during December 2017 and February 2018, using information questionnaires (age, sex, education, income level, occupation, duration of haemodialysis and underlying disease), Ellison and Paloutzian spiritual well‐being scale (SWBS) and Hope‐Herth questionnaire. In addition, the objective laboratory criteria (phosphorus and potassium) and weight difference between the two dialysis sessions from the patients’ records were used for examining the adherence to the diet.

Measurement of variables

The spiritual well‐being questionnaire was designed by Palutzian and Ellison (1982) and included 20 questions. Questions with even and odd numbers assessed the existential and religious well‐being, respectively and ultimately, the total score of the spiritual well‐being was calculated from the total sum. The answer to the questions was a six‐point Likert scale from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree.” In questions with positive nature, the numbers 1 and 6 were given to “Strongly disagree” and “Strongly agree,” while this process was reversed in questions with negative nature such that numbers 1 and 6 were given to “Strongly agree” and “Strongly disagree,” respectively. Therefore, the range of spiritual well‐being scores was between 20 and 120 and the existential and religious spirituality were investigated between 10 and 60, respectively. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were evaluated and validated by Palutzian and Ellison (1982) and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated at 0.91, 0.91 and 0.93 for the religious and existential well‐being and total scales, respectively. Regarding the conducted studies (e.g. Assarroudi et al., 2013; Dehbashi et al., 2014; Moghimiyan & Salmani, 2010), spiritual well‐being scores were classified into three levels of low (20–40), moderate (41–99) and high (120–100). Baljani, Khoshabi, Amanpour, and Azimi (2011) reported that Cronbach's alpha indicated acceptable reliability (r = .93), which was confirmed by Rezaie, Seyyed Fatemi, and Hosseini (2008) (r = .79). The Herth‐Hope questionnaire was an American easy‐to‐understand self‐report tool, which was written by Herth in 1992 and included 12 phrases with different degrees (Agree, Disagree and Unsure) and scores (1–3). In this questionnaire, the order of scoring questions 3 and 6 was such that the scores 1–3 were given to Agree, Unsure and Disagree, respectively. However, other questions were scored from 3 to 1, respectively. Scores 12–24 were considered as low hope, 25–30 as average hope and 31–36 as high hope. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of 12 and 36 were considered for each person. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the reliability of this questionnaire were calculated at 0.97 and 0.91 by Herth (1992) with a test–retest method for 2 weeks. Baljani et al. (2011) confirmed the validity of the questionnaire and the reliability of the questionnaire was calculated at 0.82 with Cronbach's alpha. The values of laboratory indexes (potassium, phosphorus and interdialytic weight gain) were employed to study the adherence to the diet, which was defined as K < 6, PO4 < 7 mg/dl and the interdialytic weight gain (IDWG)9 < 2 (43) in three short dialysis interval. Moreover, interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) is an objective index for the adherence to the restrictions on fluids consumption. Height and weight measurements were computed using calibrated electronic scales and a stadiometer and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by the height (m2). IDWG is the result of a difference in patient's weight immediately after the end of the dialysis session and before the start of the next dialysis session. The average of this index during a recent month was recorded in the patient's record. Based on the previous studies, the average amount of phosphorus and potassium during the past 3 months was calculated as the laboratory indexes of adherence to the restrictions on potassium and phosphorus (Esmaeili, Ahmadi, Jannati, Khalilian, & Espabodi, 2013;Rambod et al., 2008). If their mean values were higher than the normal one, they were considered as non‐adherent to the treatment. According to Kugler, Vlaminck, Haverich, and Maes (2005) and Esmaeili et al. (2013), serum potassium levels >6 mg/dl indicated the lack of adherence to the low‐potassium regime while serum phosphorus levels >7 mg/dl represented the non‐adherence to the low‐phosphorus regimen. The interdialytic weight gain more than 2 kg relative to the patient's dry weight was a sign of non‐adherence to the restrictions on fluid consumption. Accordingly, patients were categorized into adherent and non‐adherent to the low‐potassium, low‐phosphorus regimes and restrictions on fluid consumption (Kugler et al., 2005).

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate the mean, standard deviation, frequency and range of changes in demographic variables, hope, spiritual well‐being and its dimensions, as well as objective criteria of the adherence to the diet. To determine the relationship between variables, the chi‐square test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for qualitative and quantitative data, respectively. The data were analysed using SPSS software (version 16).

Ethical issues

The ethics code and hospital entrance permission were received from the University Ethics Committee. In this study, researchers were committed to ethical issues of obtaining informed written consent from participants, respect for voluntary participation and informing the participants of the purpose of the study. Also, the patients were assured that questionnaire information was completed in an anonymous and confidential way.

RESULTS

The number of patients that participated in this study totalled 110 with an average age of 53.90 (SD 13.65) years, most of whom were over the age of 59 (40%). Furthermore, most patients were women (57 patients, 51.8%) and married 84.5% (93 people). In terms of education, 50% (55 patients) were illiterate or had an elementary level of education. Additionally, 59.1% (65 patients) of patients were unemployed and 52.7% (58 patients) reported that their incomes were about 5,000 thousand Rials a month. In addition, 48.2% (53 patients) of patients had a haemodialysis history between 1–5 years and 50.9% had high blood pressure (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of absolute and relative abundance of the research units based on the personal characteristics

Demographic characteristicsGroupsFrequencyPercentage
AgeUnder 3065.5
30–391110.0
40–491614.5
50–593330.0
Above 594440.0
GenderMale5348.2
Female5751.8
Marital statusSingle1715.5
Married9384.5
Education levelIlliterate and elementary5550.0
Middle school and high school3027.3
Diploma1917.3
Above diploma65.5
Income level5,000 Thousand Rials5852.7
10 Million – 5,000 Thousand Rials2421.8
Above 1 Million Rials2825.5
JobUnemployed6559.1
Worker1816.4
Employee1311.8
Self‐employment1412.7
History of haemodialysis1 year3632.7
1–5 years5348.2
Above 5 years2119.1
Underlying diseaseHigh blood pressure5650.9
Diabetes2018.2
Diabetes and blood pressure3430.9
Distribution of absolute and relative abundance of the research units based on the personal characteristics The results indicated that the mean score for hope was 30.10 (SD 5.82) among the dialysis patients. Most patients (69 patients, 62.7%) had a high level of hope while 17.3% (19 patients) had moderate hope and 20% (22 patients) had low hope. In terms of spiritual well‐being, the mean score of participants was obtained 75.05 (SD 7.54). Furthermore, 78.2% of patients (86 patients) had a moderate score, 19.1% (21 patients) had a high score and 2.7% (3 patients) had a low score in terms of their spiritual well‐being. Regarding the objective method of assessing the adherence of dialysis patients to their diet, the data indicated that 69.1% (76 patients) had an interdialytic weight gain of <2 kg during the last month. Generally, 89.1% (98 patients) adhered to the low‐potassium diet (potassium <6 mEq/l over the last 3 months) and 65.5% (72) adhered to the low‐phosphorus diet (phosphorus <7 mEq/l over the last 3 months) (Table 2).
Table 2

Distribution of absolute and relative frequency, mean and standard deviation, and range of life expectancy, spiritual well‐being and adherence of the diet in research units

VariableCategoriesFrequencyPercentageMean and standard deviationVariation range
HopeLow2220.030.10 ± 5.8214–36
Moderate1917.3
High6962.7
Spiritual well‐beingLow32.775.05 ± 7.5458–108
Moderate8678.2
High2119.1
Adherence to the dietInterdialytic weight gainAdherence7669.11.85 ± 1.060.20–6
Non‐adherence3430.9
Serum potassium levelAdherence9889.15.13 ± 0.752.90–6.60
Non‐adherence1210.9
Serum phosphorous levelAdherence7265.55.46 ± 1.382.80–9.5
Non‐adherence3834.5
Distribution of absolute and relative frequency, mean and standard deviation, and range of life expectancy, spiritual well‐being and adherence of the diet in research units In the process of determining the relationship between hope and spiritual well‐being with dietary adherence using the objective method, the results showed a significant relationship between hope and interdialytic weight gain (r = −.289, p = .002), the number of absences in terms of the haemodialysis sessions (r = −.443, p = .001), serum potassium level (r = −.293, p = .012) and serum phosphorus level (r = −.328 and p = .001). Based on the results of the Pearson correlation between spiritual well‐being and adherence to diet, a significant relationship was observed between spiritual well‐being and interdialytic weight gain (r = −.328, p = .001), serum potassium level (r = −.365, p = .001) and serum phosphorus level (r = −.430 and p = .001). Furthermore, a significant relationship was identified between the dimensions of spiritual well‐being and adherence to the diet, as well as between religious and existential well‐being with the index of interdialytic weight gain, in addition to the number of absences in haemodialysis sessions, serum potassium and serum phosphorus levels (p < .05) (Table 3).
Table 3

The relationship between life expectancy, spiritual well‐being and dietary adherence in research units

VariableInterdialytic weight gainSerum potassium levelSerum phosphorus level
r p r p r p
Hope.289** .002.239* .012.328** .001
Spiritual well‐being.307** .001.365** .001.430** .001
Religious well‐being.291** .002.173.07.266** .005
Existential well‐being.215* .024.420** .001.436** .001

Significant at p < .01.

Significant at .05.

The relationship between life expectancy, spiritual well‐being and dietary adherence in research units Significant at p < .01. Significant at .05. As shown in Tables 4 and 5, no significant relationship was found between hope, spiritual well‐being, the existential and religious dimensions of spiritual well‐being and the objective indicators of the adherence to the diet with variables such as age, education, income and occupation and the history of haemodialysis at a level of 0.05. However, there was a significant relationship between spiritual as well as existential well‐being and the underlying disease (r = −.204 and p = .032, r = −.188 and p = .049).
Table 4

The relationship between hope, spiritual well‐being and adherence to the diet with demographic characteristics in research units

VariableAgeEducationIncome levelJob
r p r p r p r p
Hope−.009.92.055.56.157.10−.134.16
Spiritual well‐being.001.99.128.18.083.39.047.62
Religious well‐being.043.65.091.34−.041.66.109.25
Existential well‐being−.041.67.119.21.093.33−.028.77
Interdialytic weight gain (kg)−.101.29−.055.56−.096.31.066.49
Serum potassium level−.016.87−.113.24.021.82−.014.88
Serum phosphorus level−.036.71.038.69−.002.98.026.78
Table 5

The relationship between life expectancy, spiritual well‐being and adherence to the diet with demographic characteristics in research units

VariableGenderMarital statusHaemodialysis durationUnderlying disease
χ 2 p χ 2 p r p r p
Hope0.038.984.62.099.094.32.048.61
Spiritual well‐being2.95.223.78.15.092.33−.204* .032
Religious well‐being1.110.571.93.38.062.52−.146.12
Existential well‐being0.247.884.49.10.089.35−.188* .049
Interdialytic weight gain (kg)1.95.161.65.19.078.41.108.25
Serum potassium level0.229.632.46.11.014.88.011.91
Serum phosphorus level0.015.901.07.29.122.20.065.50

Significant at p < .05.

The relationship between hope, spiritual well‐being and adherence to the diet with demographic characteristics in research units The relationship between life expectancy, spiritual well‐being and adherence to the diet with demographic characteristics in research units Significant at p < .05.

DISCUSSION

Considering the importance of adherence to dietary restrictions in haemodialysis patients and the risk of adverse complications caused by non‐compliance with these limitations, the present study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between spiritual well‐being and hope with adherence to the diet in haemodialysis patients, with the aim of determining the role of the involved factors in enhancing the adherence to the diet. In terms of dietary adherence based on the objective indexes, including potassium, phosphorus and being overweight between the two sessions, most patients were among the adherence to the diet group. The present study represented that most patients (89.1%) had a normal range of potassium, indicating that most patients were adherent to the low‐potassium diet. In this regard, this research is similar to the studies conducted by Gibson, Held, Khawnekar, and Rutherford (2016) and Esmaeili et al. (2013), which showed a potassium level in the range of 60%–96% in dialysis patients. It is worth noting that 65.5% of patients were in the expected range for their phosphorus level and they were adherent to the low‐phosphorus diet. This is consistent with the results of some of the studies that reported the phosphorus range of the patients as being between 43% and 81%. However, Lee and Molassiotis (2002) emphasized the rate of the patients’ adherence to a low‐phosphorus diet by 43%, which is not consistent with the results of this paper. The lower adherence of the patients to the low‐phosphorus diet suggests that the patients have no adherence to the medical diet in addition to the non‐observance of restrictions in terms of phosphorus. Compared with the low‐phosphorus diet in the present study, the higher adherence of patients to a low‐potassium diet may indicate that the patients are aware of the dangerous complications of potassium such as cardiac arrest and death, although the complications of phosphorus are revealed gradually and they are not as dangerous as potassium. The results of this research indicate the adherence of most patients (69.1%) to the fluid regimes and the preservation of an interdialytic weight gain of <2 kg. This is in line with the studies of Esmaeili et al. (2013) and Gibson et al. (2016). In this regard, the results of some of the other studies (Lee & Molassiotis, 2002; Rambod, Peyrovi, Sareban & Mohebbi., 2008) that reported on the rate of non‐adherence to the fluid regime by 59.7% and 56%, respectively, were different from the results of the present study. Factors such as the amount of urine left, the dialysis hours and the interval between two sessions of dialysis affects the interdialytic weight gain (Esmaeili et al., 2013). In addition, the cutting point in the classification of the groups into two categories (adherence and non‐adherence) is different across the various studies (Khalili et al., 2011;Rambod et al., 2008). The results highlighted that most patients had a high level of hope, which is consistent with the studies of Ottaviani et al. (2014) and which measured the hope of patients undergoing haemodialysis. Considering the study conducted by Alberto and Joyner (2008) on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the hope score was reported to be at a high level between 35 and 48, although this score was reported at a low level in the studies of Baljani et al. (2011) and Dehbashi et al. (2014). The difference in the results of these two studies with those in the present study can be attributed to the cultural differences affecting the acceptance of the disease, the quality of medical care and the level of perceived social support. In addition to these factors, since most the patients had a history of 1–5 years of haemodialysis treatment, it is possible to highlight the effectiveness of using the mechanisms of adaptation to chronic disease and passing the disease crisis in relation to the high level of hope in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Based on the results, the scores of spiritual well‐being and its existential and religious dimensions were moderate in most patients. This is consistent with the results in the studies of Baljani et al. (2011) and Dehbashi et al. (2014). However, the spiritual well‐being scores were at a high level in other studies (Hojjati, Qorbani, Nazari, Sharifnia, & Akhundzadeh, 2010;Taheri kharameh et al., 2013). Considering the similar conditions of age in these studies with the present study, the difference in the results can be attributed to the differences in the research environments and the ethnic groups of the participants. This is because different geographic environments do not result in the same spiritual well‐being due to differences in the religious backgrounds. By studying the relationship between spiritual well‐being and adherence to diet, the results demonstrated a significant statistical relationship between the two dimensions of spiritual well‐being including existential and religious well‐being and the objective indexes of the adherence to the diet (potassium, phosphorus, interdialytic weight gain, as well as the number of absences in dialysis sessions). Based on the results, spiritual well‐being is an important factor in the context of the adherence to diet in dialysis patients. Individuals with a higher spiritual well‐being were more adherent to their diet, although no significant relationship was observed between religion and adherence to the treatment in the study of Berman et al. (2004). This lack of relationship, according to the researcher, could be attributed to a small number (about 5) of patients who denied belonging to any religion (Berman et al., 2004). Alvarez et al. (2016) found there to be a statistically significant relationship between spirituality and adherence to treatment in patients with heart failure. Black, Davis, Heathcotte, Mitchell, & Sanderson, (2006) suggested that spiritual beliefs affect health beliefs, which could lead to health activities such as using the prescribed drugs, weight control and adherence to and compliance with the therapeutic regime. The findings of the present study highlight the significant relationship between hope and all of the objective indexes of the adherence to the diet (potassium, phosphorus and interdialytic weight gain). Hope is regarded as one of the most important factors in the effective adaptation to chronic disease, as well as the acceptance of the therapeutic regimen (Eliott & Olver, 2009). Hope is a strong adaptation mechanism in chronic patients and hopeful people can easily cope with the crisis of disease. Furthermore, hope is the centre of desire and attention in individuals and it is an essential factor for survival and continuity of life (Ghezelseflo & Esbati, 2013). Berg, Rapoff, Snyder, and Belmont (2007) demonstrated that the existence of psychological variables, especially hope, could lead to an increase in the adherence to treatment in children with asthma. The results of the present study indicate there to be a significant statistical relationship between hope and spiritual well‐being. Accordingly, the higher the level of spiritual well‐being in haemodialysis patients, the higher the level of hope will be. In addition, Ottaviani et al. (2014) and Dehbashi et al. (2014) showed there to be a significant relationship between spiritual well‐being and hope in haemodialysis patients. In another study, Pinto (2012) found a positive and moderate correlation between hope and spiritual well‐being among cancer patients. Thus, hope is regarded as one of the essential requirements of human beings, that creates the power of support, encouragement and adaptation to hard conditions in one person. However, religion and spirituality may be associated with hope. Since the dimensions of spirituality make life meaningful and they are considered to be a source of hope, spirituality leads to adaptation to disease (Aghighi et al., 2008). By reviewing the studies conducted in the domain of hope, Souliotis et al. (2016) reported that high levels of hope have a positive relationship with physical and psychological well‐being, high self‐esteem, positive thinking and extraordinary social relationships. It should be noted that no significant relationship was found between the objective indicators of the adherence to the diet and demographic variables. This is like the results of Esmaeil et al. (2013) regarding the non‐existence of a significant relationship between the amount of potassium and phosphorus and the demographic characteristics of the patients. This difference can be related to the low level of education of most people (illiterate and elementary) in the present study. However, Rambod, Peyrovi, Sareban and Mohebbi (2008) concluded there to be a significant relationship between education level and the amount of phosphorus, potassium, urea and interdialytic weight gain. Regarding the examination of the relationship between the hope and demographic variables, no significant relationship was found between hope and sex, marital status, the duration of haemodialysis and underlying disease. Furthermore, no significant relationship was observed between spiritual well‐being and the variables such as gender, marital status and the duration of haemodialysis. Subsequently, there was a significant statistical difference between spiritual well‐being and underlying disease. Based on this interpretation, people with a higher spiritual well‐being have better compatibility and control over underlying diseases such as blood pressure and diabetes. People may be encouraged to bolster their spirituality in order to find the additional motivation to begin and maintain healthy behaviours (Aldwin, Park, Jeong, & Nath, 2014).

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The limitations of the present study included the limited sample size and addressing only one centre, which restricted the generalizability of the findings. On the other hand, some limitations refer to the cross‐sectional study design. This is as it does not allow for us to determine a causal relationship between spiritual health and hope with dietary adherence. Furthermore, hope and spirituality health, as well as diet and fluid adherence, can be changed in different conditions over time. The longitudinal follow‐up of these patients is in progress and it will hopefully allow us to be better able to delineate this relationship. Finally, the objective index was only used to assess the dietary and fluid adherence and no information was available on the subjective aspects of adherence in these patients. In general, access to this type of information could be useful to determine the behaviours related to adherence to diet and fluid limitations better. Since this research was a simple analytical‐descriptive study conducted over a short period of time using the census method with a single group, we had some limitations when it came to controlling all the confounders. For more precision and control of the potential confounders, conducting interventional studies using random sampling in a larger population is recommended.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that hope and spirituality could be essential variables and are related to diet‐adherence. These issues warrant further investigation. It is suggested that future studies could examine a larger community of chronic dialysis patients as well as other chronic diseases. It could also consider all aspects of the adherence to the therapeutic regimen, both subjectively and objectively. Finally, approaches should be considered to increase the level of hope and spiritual well‐being in these patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.
  30 in total

1.  Self-esteem in Greek dialysis patients: the contribution of health locus of control.

Authors:  Paraskevi Theofilou
Journal:  Iran J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.892

2.  Nonadherence with diet and fluid restrictions among adults having hemodialysis.

Authors:  Christiane Kugler; Hans Vlaminck; Axel Haverich; Bart Maes
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.176

3.  Skipped treatments, markers of nutritional nonadherence, and survival among incident hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Mark L Unruh; Idris V Evans; Nancy E Fink; Neil R Powe; Klemens B Meyer
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Dialysis in Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Aghighi; Alireza Heidary Rouchi; Mahnaz Zamyadi; Mitra Mahdavi-Mazdeh; Hamid Rajolani; Sadegh Ahrabi; Mozafar Zamani
Journal:  Iran J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.892

5.  The End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ): testing the psychometric properties in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Lorraine S Evangelista; Linda R Phillips; Carol Pavlish; Joel D Kopple
Journal:  Nephrol Nurs J       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.959

6.  Discussing spirituality with patients: a rational and ethical approach.

Authors:  Gary McCord; Valerie J Gilchrist; Steven D Grossman; Bridget D King; Kenelm E McCormick; Allison M Oprandi; Susan Labuda Schrop; Brian A Selius; D O William D Smucker; David L Weldy; Melissa Amorn; Melissa A Carter; Andrew J Deak; Hebah Hefzy; Mohit Srivastava
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Hope, optimism, and self-care among Better Breathers Support Group members with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  June Alberto; Barry Joyner
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.257

Review 8.  Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews.

Authors:  Sandra van Dulmen; Emmy Sluijs; Liset van Dijk; Denise de Ridder; Rob Heerdink; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Optimism and Hope in Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cecilia C Schiavon; Eduarda Marchetti; Léia G Gurgel; Fernanda M Busnello; Caroline T Reppold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-04

10.  Differences in Knowledge, Stress, Sensation Seeking, and Locus of Control Linked to Dietary Adherence in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  E Leigh Gibson; Ines Held; Dina Khawnekar; Peter Rutherford
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  The Predictor Roles of Spiritual Well-Being, Healthcare Professionals' Support and Shock Anxiety in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Device Acceptance.

Authors:  Nilofar Pasyar; Masoume Rambod; Alireza Zare; Mohammad Hossein Nikoo
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Psychosocial, Spiritual, and Biomedical Predictors of Hope in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Masoume Rambod; Nilofar Pasyar; Mahsa Mokhtarizadeh
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2020-06-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.