Literature DB >> 18850103

Circumcised hypospadias.

Rafael V Pieretti1, Alberto Pieretti, Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with circumcised hypospadias have been of significant concern over many decades due to the belief that prior circumcision might negatively affect the results of hypospadias' repair. We evaluated outcomes in consecutive males with anterior, distal penile, and the megameatus with intact prepuce variant of hypospadias (MIP).
METHODS: After IRB approval a retrospective of 48 consecutive males with circumcised hypospadias was reviewed. In all cases the urethroplasty was accomplished with either urethral plate tubularization or a MAGPI procedure. No skin flaps were used.
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients with circumcised hypospadias (anterior, MIP variant, and distal penile) underwent operative reconstruction by one of us (RVP). All patients were followed for at least 8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Prior circumcision did not negatively affect the results of subsequent urethroplasty in patients with anterior, distal penile, and the MIP variant of hypospadias. The use of the tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) has virtually eliminated the need for skin flaps in anterior hypospadias repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18850103     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-008-2254-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  7 in total

1.  Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision.

Authors:  H C Thompson; L R King; E Knox; S B Korones
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Technical challenge of the megameatus intact prepuce hypospadias variant: the pyramid procedure.

Authors:  J W Duckett; M A Keating
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prior circumcision does not complicate repair of hypospadias with an intact prepuce.

Authors:  Warren T Snodgrass; Rose Khavari
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  T flap hypospadias repair in circumcised patients.

Authors:  R L Bang; M K Ebrahim; A R Lari
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1993-03

5.  Urethral advancement for distal hypospadias repair in circumcised patients.

Authors:  N K Baran
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  American Academy of Pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on Circumcision.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The modified pyramid hypospadias procedure: repair of megameatus and deep glanular groove variants.

Authors:  G A Hill; J Wacksman; A G Lewis; C A Sheldon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.450

  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current hypospadias management: Diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term patient-centred outcomes.

Authors:  Melise A Keays; Sumit Dave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Neonatal circumcision: new recommendations & implications for practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Simpson; Jean Carstensen; Patrick Murphy
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun

3.  The Megameatus, Intact Prepuce Variant of Hypospadias: Use of the Inframeatal Vascularized Flap for Surgical Correction.

Authors:  Marc Cendron
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Comparison of distal hypospadias repair in circumcised patients and uncircumcised patients.

Authors:  Fahimeh Kazemi Rashed; Rasool Gholizade
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-02-26

5.  Mathieu repair of distal and midshaft hypospadias: risks and benefits of foreskin reconstruction versus circumcision.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Moslemi; Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani; Hossein Shahrokh
Journal:  Open Access J Urol       Date:  2011-06-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.