Literature DB >> 26646757

A phase I, first in human study of FP-1039 (GSK3052230), a novel FGF ligand trap, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

A W Tolcher1, K P Papadopoulos2, A Patnaik2, K Wilson3, S Thayer4, J Zanghi4, A T Gemo4, W M Kavanaugh4, H N Keer4, P M LoRusso3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) play important roles in multiple cancers by supporting tumor growth and angiogenesis. FP-1039 (GSK3052230) is a FGF ligand trap consisting of the extracellular domain of FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) fused with the Fc region of IgG1. FP-1039 binds and neutralizes multiple FGFs that normally bind FGFR1. The primary objective of this phase I study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of FP-1039. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors for which standard treatments were ineffective were treated with weekly doses of FP-1039 for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks observation.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects received a mean of 6 infusions of FP-1039 at doses ranging from 0.5 to 16 mg/kg weekly, with no maximally tolerated dose identified. Grade 3 or greater treatment emergent adverse events were uncommon. Four dose-limiting toxicities were reported at doses of 0.75 mg/kg (urticaria), 1 mg/kg (intestinal perforation and neutropenia), and 16 mg/kg (muscular weakness). Drug exposure was dose proportional, and the terminal elimination half-life was 2.6-3.9 days following a single dose. Target engagement as measured by low free plasma FGF2 levels was achieved. FGF pathway dysregulation was uncommon. No objective responses were observed.
CONCLUSION: In nonselected cancer patients with advanced disease, treatment with FP-1039 was well tolerated and toxicities associated with small molecule drugs that inhibit FGFR tyrosine kinases, including hyperphosphatemia, were not observed. Further studies of FP-1039 in patients selected for FGF pathway dysregulation, who are most likely to benefit, are now underway.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FGF; cancer; ligand trap; phase I

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26646757     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  14 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Strategies for Developing Next-Generation Protein Therapeutics for Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  James R Kintzing; Maria V Filsinger Interrante; Jennifer R Cochran
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 2.  Targeting FGFR in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung.

Authors:  Neda Hashemi-Sadraei; Nasser Hanna
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  A phase Ib study of GSK3052230, an FGF ligand trap in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Emilie M J van Brummelen; Evgeny Levchenko; Manuel Dómine; Dean A Fennell; Hedy L Kindler; Santiago Viteri; Shirish Gadgeel; Pilar Garrido López; Vladimir Kostorov; Daniel Morgensztern; Sergey Orlov; Marjorie G Zauderer; Johan F Vansteenkiste; Katherine Baker-Neblett; James Vasquez; Xiaowei Wang; David I Bellovin; Jan H M Schellens; Li Yan; Ionel Mitrica; M Phillip DeYoung; José Trigo
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  The beginning of the era of precision medicine for gastric cancer with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 aberration.

Authors:  Akira Ooki; Kensei Yamaguchi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 7.701

5.  Small Peptide Modulation of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3-Dependent Postnatal Lymphangiogenesis.

Authors:  David P Perrault; Gene K Lee; Sun Young Park; Sunju Lee; Dongwon Choi; Eunson Jung; Young Jin Seong; Eun Kyung Park; Cynthia Sung; Roy Yu; Antoun Bouz; Austin Pourmoussa; Soo Jung Kim; Young-Kwon Hong; Alex K Wong
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.589

6.  Specific Antibody Fragment Ligand Traps Blocking FGF1 Activity.

Authors:  Julia Chudzian; Anna Szlachcic; Malgorzata Zakrzewska; Miroslawa Czub; Marcin Pustula; Tad A Holak; Jacek Otlewski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  FHF1 is a bona fide fibroblast growth factor that activates cellular signaling in FGFR-dependent manner.

Authors:  Martyna Sochacka; Lukasz Opalinski; Jakub Szymczyk; Marta B Zimoch; Aleksandra Czyrek; Daniel Krowarsch; Jacek Otlewski; Malgorzata Zakrzewska
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 8.  FGF/FGFR signaling in health and disease.

Authors:  Yangli Xie; Nan Su; Jing Yang; Qiaoyan Tan; Shuo Huang; Min Jin; Zhenhong Ni; Bin Zhang; Dali Zhang; Fengtao Luo; Hangang Chen; Xianding Sun; Jian Q Feng; Huabing Qi; Lin Chen
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-09-02

Review 9.  Triple-negative breast cancer: promising prognostic biomarkers currently in development.

Authors:  Jasmine Sukumar; Kelly Gast; Dionisia Quiroga; Maryam Lustberg; Nicole Williams
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 10.  Current Status of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Navid Sobhani; Anna Ianza; Alberto D'Angelo; Giandomenico Roviello; Fabiola Giudici; Marina Bortul; Fabrizio Zanconati; Cristina Bottin; Daniele Generali
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.