Literature DB >> 26646362

Impact of Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality: The UK Program 20 Years On.

Nathalie J Massat1, Amanda Dibden1, Dharmishta Parmar1, Jack Cuzick1, Peter D Sasieni1, Stephen W Duffy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With changes in diagnosis, treatment, and management of breast cancer since the mammography screening trials, there is a need to evaluate contemporary breast screening programs. A case-control study was set up to assess the current impact of attendance in the English Breast Screening Program on breast cancer mortality.
METHODS: Cancer registry cases who died from primary breast cancer ages 47 to 89 years in London in 2008 to 2009 (869 women) were matched to 1 or 2 general population controls (1,642 women) with no diagnosis of breast cancer at the time of the case's diagnosis, who were alive at the case's death. Cases and controls were matched for date of birth and screening area, and had been invited to breast screening at least once prior to the case's diagnosis. ORs were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Self-selection bias was addressed using contemporaneous attendance at the cervical screening program. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess the likely effect of lead time bias.
RESULTS: Attendance at breast screening resulted in a breast cancer mortality reduction of 39% [OR, 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-0.85] after self-selection correction. Attendance in the last 3 years prior to diagnosis resulted in a 60% mortality reduction (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.31-0.51). Lead time bias effects were negligible.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that community breast screening programs provide their expected benefit in terms of reducing the risk of breast cancer death among women participating. IMPACT: Mammography is an important tool for reducing breast cancer mortality and its impact could be increased by encouraging regular attendance. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26646362     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  18 in total

Review 1.  Screening for Cancer in Persons Living with HIV Infection.

Authors:  James J Goedert; H Dean Hosgood; Robert J Biggar; Howard D Strickler; Charles S Rabkin
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2016-08

2.  Advanced Imaging for Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer: From Morphology to Function.

Authors:  Katja Pinker
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Assessing predicted age-specific breast cancer mortality rates in 27 European countries by 2020.

Authors:  R Clèries; R M Rooney; M Vilardell; J A Espinàs; T Dyba; J M Borras
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Identify factors for insufficient (> 2 yr) mammogram screening among Oregonian women.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Zhang; Grace Curran; Kenneth Xu; Jeong Youn Lim; Paige E Farris; Jackilen Shannon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.532

5.  Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study.

Authors:  Louise E Johns; Derek A Coleman; Anthony J Swerdlow; Susan M Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Effects of curcumin complexes on MDA‑MB‑231 breast cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Fatima Mohammed; Fiza Rashid-Doubell; Safa Taha; Seamas Cassidy; Salim Fredericks
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Wealth stratified inequalities in service utilisation of breast cancer screening across the geographical regions: a pooled decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Rashidul Alam Mahumud; Khorshed Alam; Syed Afroz Keramat; Andre M N Renzaho; Md Golam Hossain; Rezwanul Haque; Gail M Ormsby; Jeff Dunn; Jeff Gow
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-06-10

8.  Effectiveness evaluation of organized screening for esophageal cancer: a case-control study in Linzhou city, China.

Authors:  Qiong Chen; Liang Yu; Changqing Hao; Jinwu Wang; Shuzheng Liu; Meng Zhang; Shaokai Zhang; Lanwei Guo; Peiliang Quan; Patrick Germain; Yawei Zhang; Xibin Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A novel framework for classification of selection processes in epidemiological research.

Authors:  Jonas Björk; Anton Nilsson; Carl Bonander; Ulf Strömberg
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  p38β - MAPK11 and its role in female cancers.

Authors:  Periklis Katopodis; Rachel Kerslake; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Nefeli Beri; Vladimir Anikin
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.