Literature DB >> 26645412

GABRB3 mutations: a new and emerging cause of early infantile epileptic encephalopathy.

Apostolos Papandreou1,2, Amy McTague3, Natalie Trump4, Gautam Ambegaonkar5, Adeline Ngoh3, Esther Meyer2, Richard H Scott4, Manju A Kurian2,3.   

Abstract

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor β3 gene (GABRB3) encodes the β3-subunit of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA ) receptor, which mediates inhibitory signalling within the central nervous system. Recently, GABRB3 mutations have been identified in a few patients with infantile spasms and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. We report the clinical and electrographic features of a novel case of GABRB3-related early-onset epileptic encephalopathy. Our patient presented with neonatal hypotonia and feeding difficulties, then developed pharmacoresistant epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by multiple seizure types from 3 months of age. Electroencephalography demonstrated ictal generalized and interictal multifocal epileptiform abnormalities. Using a SureSelectXT custom multiple gene panel covering 48 early infantile epileptic encephalopathy/developmental delay genes, a novel de novo GABRB3 heterozygous missense mutation, c.860C>T (p.Thr287Ile), was identified and confirmed on Sanger sequencing. GABRB3 is an emerging cause of early-onset epilepsy. Novel genetic technologies, such as whole-exome/genome sequencing and multiple gene panels, will undoubtedly identify further cases, allowing more detailed electroclinical delineation of the GABRB3-related genotypic and phenotypic spectra.
© 2015 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac Keith Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645412      PMCID: PMC4864756          DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol        ISSN: 0012-1622            Impact factor:   5.449


Gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A Gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor β3 gene A report of a novel GABRB3 mutation associated with early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. A detailed description of the clinical and electrographic features of the case. A review of the few other reported cases of GABRB3‐related epileptic encephalopathy. A discussion of this gene's association with other neurodevelopmental disorder phenotypes. Increased clinical awareness of the role of multiple gene panels in the diagnosis of early infantile epilepsy. Gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors are ligand‐gated chloride channels that act as the primary mediators of fast inhibitory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. They belong to the Cys‐loop superfamily, and are formed by pentameric assemblies of different subunit subtypes: α1–α6, β1–β3, γ1–γ3, δ, ε, π, θ, and ρ1–ρ3.1 Most GABAA receptors contain two α‐subunits, two β‐subunits, and another, most commonly a γ‐subunit.2, 3 These subunits have four transmembrane domains, of which the second transmembrane domain forms a central ion pore with the other four subunits4 (Fig. 1a). When GABA, the physiological ligand of GABAA receptors binds to the receptor, the ion pore opens, facilitating chloride influx or efflux. The direction of chloride flux depends on intracellular chloride concentration, regulated by the potassium‐chloride KCC2 and sodium–potassium–chloride NKCC1 co‐transporters. In developing brains, the predominance of NKCC1 leads to increased intracellular chloride, resulting in GABA‐mediated chloride efflux which depolarizes the cell membrane, thus leading to neuronal excitation.5 Mature neuronal cell bodies have low intracellular concentrations of chloride due to high levels of KCC2 expression, leading to GABA‐mediated chloride influx that hyperpolarizes the cell membrane leading to neuronal inhibition.6
Figure 1

(a) Top: Schematic diagram of the gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor and the gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor β3 (GABRB3) subunit (depicted on the left). Most physiological heteromeric GABAA receptors are thought to include two α‐, two β‐, and one other (most frequently a γ‐) subunits. Bottom: Each β3‐subunit consists of an extracellular domain, an α‐helical M1–M4 transmembrane bundle, and an M3–M4 intracellular loop. The M2 segments line the ion channel pore that tapers as it traverses towards the intracellular side of the membrane. The de novo heterozygous mutation in GABRB3 in our proband is located in amino acid position 287. Thr287 is located in the M2 segment. Previously reported mutations in patients with epileptic encephalopathies are located in amino acid positions 110, 120, 138, 180, and 302. Polymorphisms and mutations implicated in childhood absence epilepsy are in positions 11, 15, and 32, clustered closer to the N terminus. All above mutations and variants are depicted as circles with corresponding numbers. (b) Interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) recording is seen above, showing high‐amplitude multifocal discharges, particularly in the right anterior region (circle). Ictal EEG is depicted below, demonstrating generalized fast activity, more prominent over the frontal regions.

(a) Top: Schematic diagram of the gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor and the gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor β3 (GABRB3) subunit (depicted on the left). Most physiological heteromeric GABAA receptors are thought to include two α‐, two β‐, and one other (most frequently a γ‐) subunits. Bottom: Each β3‐subunit consists of an extracellular domain, an α‐helical M1–M4 transmembrane bundle, and an M3–M4 intracellular loop. The M2 segments line the ion channel pore that tapers as it traverses towards the intracellular side of the membrane. The de novo heterozygous mutation in GABRB3 in our proband is located in amino acid position 287. Thr287 is located in the M2 segment. Previously reported mutations in patients with epileptic encephalopathies are located in amino acid positions 110, 120, 138, 180, and 302. Polymorphisms and mutations implicated in childhood absence epilepsy are in positions 11, 15, and 32, clustered closer to the N terminus. All above mutations and variants are depicted as circles with corresponding numbers. (b) Interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) recording is seen above, showing high‐amplitude multifocal discharges, particularly in the right anterior region (circle). Ictal EEG is depicted below, demonstrating generalized fast activity, more prominent over the frontal regions. Given the central inhibitory role of GABAA receptors, it is not surprising that, to date, several genetic epilepsy syndromes have been associated with variants in GABAA receptor subunit genes including GABRA1, GABRB3, GABRD, and GABRG2.7 GABRB3, located on chromosome 15q11.2‐q12, encodes the β3‐subunit of the GABAA receptor. Reduced GABRB3 expression has been postulated in the pathogenesis of absence seizures, abnormal sensory processing, and other neurodevelopmental disorder phenotypes such as Angelman syndrome, autism spectrum disorders, and intellectual disability.8, 9, 10 Furthermore, single nucleotide polymorphisms and missense mutations in GABRB3 have previously been implicated in childhood absence epilepsy.11, 12 In 2013, GABRB3 mutations were identified in patients with infantile spasms and Lennox–Gastaut syndrome.13 To date, few cases of GABRB3 epileptic encephalopathy have been described in the literature. We report a case of early‐onset epilepsy with a de novo GABRB3 mutation identified on a diagnostic multiple gene panel, and delineate the electroclinical phenotype in our patient.

Case Report

A male, first‐born to unrelated white parents, was delivered after induction of labour, by forceps delivery at 42 weeks' gestation. The antenatal period was unremarkable and he was born in good condition. His maternal grandfather reported having seizures in childhood provoked by startling, but these resolved spontaneously and there were no further neurodevelopmental concerns. Family history was otherwise non‐contributory. The patient presented with neonatal hypotonia, feeding difficulties, and failure to thrive in early infancy. At 3 months of age, he developed clusters of short seizures characterized by eye deviation, eyelid flickering, tonic arm extension, and back arching. Ictal electroencephalography (EEG) revealed generalized fast activity, more prominent over the frontal regions, and interictal recordings showed high‐amplitude delta/theta multifocal (but predominantly right anterior) discharges (Fig. 1b). Initially, complete cessation of seizures was achieved in response to therapeutic doses of the GABA transaminase inhibitor vigabatrin. However, severe hypotonia, sedation, and respiratory difficulties ensued, hence the patient was weaned off vigabatrin and it was discontinued. Seizures recurred at 5months of age, and, despite multiple antiepileptic therapies (initially carbamazepine 14 mg/kg/day; then levetiracetam 40 mg/kg/day, topiramate 4 mg/kg/day, and sodium valproate 25 mg/kg/day in combination; and finally ketogenic diet with levetiracetam up to 50 mg/kg/day), he continued to have ongoing intractable epilepsy. At the time of last review, age 3 years 2 months, he had 10 to 20 epileptic seizures per day. Seizure semiology was varied, with episodic behavioural arrest, focal motor events, myoclonic jerks, and brief tonic seizures with lower‐limb extension. Parents also reported frequent paroxysms of laughter of undetermined origin, but these episodes have not been captured on EEG. Over time, he developed severe global developmental delay with signs of slow progress but no obvious evidence of regression. At 3 years 2 months, head circumference plotted on the 0.4th centile. A few subtle dysmorphic features were evident, including mild prominence of his forehead with long eyelashes, tented mouth appearance, high‐arched palate, and bilateral undescended testes. There was also marked axial hypotonia and severe head lag. An overall paucity of limb movements was observed, although some antigravity movements were evident. Peripheral tone was low/normal, deep tendon reflexes were brisk throughout, and plantar responses up‐going bilaterally. There was no evidence of ankle clonus. He could make some vocalizations and was feeding orally with only occasional drooling, and no episodes of choking or swallowing difficulties. Extensive neurometabolic investigations were essentially unremarkable (Table SI, online supporting information), including a normal MRI brain (age 14 mo) and comparative genomic hybridization microarray analysis for genomic copy number variants.

Molecular Genetic Investigation

Further diagnostic testing was undertaken using a multiple gene panel covering 48 genes (Table SII, online supporting information) causing early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. A custom SureSelect library was created (Agilent's SureDesign tool, https://earray.chem.agilent.com/suredesign/). Libraries were made following the SureSelectXT Custom Capture protocol (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and sequenced in‐house on an Illumina MiSeq. Of targeted regions (target genes and their intron–exon boundaries), 99.7% were covered at ≥30×. A single heterozygous missense mutation of GABRB3 (c.860C>T, p.Thr287Ile) was identified (Fig. 1a). Subsequent Sanger sequencing of both proband and parents confirmed these findings, establishing that the mutation was absent in the parents and likely to have occurred de novo (Fig. S1, online supporting information). The variant identified is classified as ‘likely pathogenic’ according to the American College of Medical Genetics/Genomics Standards and Guidelines,14 which infers greater than 90% certainty of being disease‐causing. This variant occurred de novo, providing strong evidence of pathogenicity. It was absent in control population databases including ExAC (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), 1000 Genomes (http://browser.1000genomes.org/index.html), and Exome Variant Server (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) (moderate evidence). Furthermore, the amino acid change occurs in a transmembrane domain lining the ion channel pore4 (moderate evidence). In silico analysis provided further evidence of pathogenicity, with Polyphen2 (score 1.000, sensitivity 0.00, specificity 1.00), SIFT (score 0.000), and PROVEAN (score −5.65) predicting the variant to be probably damaging, damaging, and deleterious, respectively.

Discussion

We report a novel mutation in GABRB3 in a patient with severe intractable early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. Our report highlights the recent finding that mutations in GABRB3 are an emerging cause of early‐onset epilepsy syndromes. To date, five other cases of GABRB3 early infantile epileptic encephalopathy have been reported,10, 13 to our knowledge (Table 1). We postulate that there are several features common in all these cases, including: (1) seizure onset in infancy, <10months of age, (2) multiple seizure types including infantile spasms, (3) variable EEG abnormalities, and (4) associated comorbidities such as neurodevelopmental delay, attention‐deficit–hyperactivity disorder, autistic features, and intellectual disability. Similar to previous reported cases, our patient manifested features of a non‐specific early infantile epileptic encephalopathy disorder, with multiple seizure types and significant delay in development.
Table 1

Reported patients with early‐onset epileptic encephalopathy due to GABRB3 mutations

MutationDe novo/inheritedAge at onset (mo)Seizure semiologyEEGSeizure evolution and treatment response if reportedOther featuresIntellectual disabilityReferences
c.328A>G; p.Asn110Asp De novo5 Infantile spasms Myoclonic seizures HypsarrhythmiaNo follow‐up dataNone reportedNone at presentation; no follow‐up dataAllen et al.13
c.358G>A; p.Asn120Asp De novo10Infantile spasmsGeneralized 2Hz burstsLennox–Gastaut syndrome ADHD Impulsivity SevereAllen et al.13
c.413_415dupACC; p.Asn138_Arg139insHis De novo2 Myoclonic Focal seizures Atonic head nods Multifocal/modified burst suppressionResponsive to levetiracetam and topiramate‘Mild’ autistic featuresSevereHamdan et al.10
c.539A>G; p.Glu180Gly De novo10Infantile spasmsGeneralized 2Hz burstsLennox–Gastaut syndrome ADHD Impulsivity Sleeping difficulties SevereAllen et al.13
c.905A>G; p.Tyr302Cys De novo10 Focal dyscognitive seizures Behavioural arrests Slow, some left temporal featuresLennox–Gastaut syndromeNone reportedSevere: 20 words at 4yAllen et al.13
c.860C>T; p.Thr287Ile De novo3 Focal motor seizures Tonic seizures Generalized fast activity. Interictal delta/theta multifocal discharges Ongoing seizures with behavioural arrests, focal motor, myoclonic, tonic seizuresNone currentlySevereThis paper

ADHD, attention‐deficit–hyperactivity disorder; EEG, electroencephalography.

Reported patients with early‐onset epileptic encephalopathy due to GABRB3 mutations ADHD, attention‐deficit–hyperactivity disorder; EEG, electroencephalography. Our patient harboured a mutation affecting a highly conserved protein domain located in the second transmembrane loop lining the ion channel (Fig. 1a). It is difficult to postulate what the exact pathogenic mechanism of this variant is without any in vitro or in vivo functional work; however, it is probably due to loss of function and haploinsufficiency. It is possible that the position of the amino acid change within the receptor pore could negatively impact on receptor function, for example by inhibiting the pore's opening and subsequent chloride flux. Other mechanisms including reduced GABRB3 protein expression and incorrect cellular trafficking of GABRB3 could also play a role. This is the first reported mutation affecting this region and, to date, most other reported GABRB3 mutations causing epileptic encephalopathies target the extracellular protein domains, near the amino (N)′ terminus13 (Fig. 1a). GABRB3 has also been implicated in other neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism, childhood absence epilepsy, and Angelman syndrome. A single nucleotide polymorphism at the promoter region of GABRB3 (T>C substitution in position −897, numbering with respect to the initiator methionine of exon 1a), which leads to reduction of the promoter's transcriptional ability, has been associated with childhood absence epilepsy in previous studies.12 Other researchers have reported that a rare GABRB3 single nucleotide polymorphism (c.31C>T; p.Pro11Ser)15 and other variants (c.44C>T; p.Ser15Phe, and c.94G>A; p.Gly32Arg) (NM_021912.4) are linked with childhood absence epilepsy phenotypes associated with eyelid myoclonus and generalized tonic–clonic seizures.6, 11 Probands had typical generalized 3Hz spike and wave discharges during childhood, with clinical symptoms later remitting, without neurological sequelae. The identified mutations were also present in other family members who never had epileptic seizures, suggesting variable penetrance. The same mutations were not found in 630 healthy ethnically and sex‐matched comparison individuals in one study. However, p.Pro11Ser was later described in an asymptomatic individual, suggesting it may be a rare single nucleotide polymorphism.6, 15 Interestingly, genetic variants implicated in childhood absence epilepsy are clustered much closer to the N‐terminal domain of the protein than those identified in GABRB3 early infantile epileptic encephalopathy (Fig. 1a). In Angelman syndrome, deletions encompassing GABRB3 have been reported.16 Mice with Gabrb3 knockout have epilepsy and other abnormalities that show some similarities to patients with Angelman syndrome.17 The extent to which GABRB3 accounts for the clinical phenotype of Angelman syndrome is currently unclear. Other genes including GABRG3 and GABRA5 are also often contained within deletions causing Angelman syndrome.16 The more severe phenotype associated with such deletions might indicate an additive role for these genes in disease pathogenesis. EEG recordings in Angelman syndrome often demonstrate specific rhythmic patterns that are less prominent in patients with deletions encompassing GABRB3. Indeed, no such rhythmicity was evident in our participant. At present, there are too few reported cases of GABRB3‐related epilepsy for clear phenotype–genotype correlations or comparisons with Angelman syndrome due to chromosome deletions with GABRB3 haploinsufficiency. It is currently unknown whether mutation type and location affect clinical disease presentation, or whether other environmental or epigenetic factors may play a role. Increasing availability of novel genetic technologies, such as multiple gene panels and whole‐exome sequencing will undoubtedly accelerate the identification of further cases, allowing more detailed delineation of the spectrum of GABRB3‐related disorders. Recent studies suggest that GABRB3 mutations cause attenuated chloride currents and channel activity impairment through subunit hyperglycosylation.11 The mechanisms through which GABRR3 mutations affect neuronal networks giving rise to epilepsy and neurodevelopmental delay are yet to be fully elucidated. Further research is needed, not only to understand the underlying disease pathogenesis but also to identify novel therapies, which may also have wider implications for GABAA modulation in other neurological disorders. Figure S1: Top panel: De novo heterozygous mutation in GABRB3, c.860C>T (p.Thr287Ile) detected by panel and confirmed by Sanger sequencing (red rectangle). Click here for additional data file. Table SI: Neurometabolic investigations undertaken in patient. Table SII: Epilepsy and severe delay gene panel result. Click here for additional data file.
  16 in total

1.  Forced subunit assembly in alpha1beta2gamma2 GABAA receptors. Insight into the absolute arrangement.

Authors:  Sabine W Baumann; Roland Baur; Erwin Sigel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Screening of GABRB3 in French-Canadian families with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

Authors:  Pamela Lachance-Touchette; Caroline Martin; Chantal Poulin; Micheline Gravel; Lionel Carmant; Patrick Cossette
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 3.  GABAA receptor channels.

Authors:  R L Macdonald; R W Olsen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  Structure, function, and modulation of GABA(A) receptors.

Authors:  Erwin Sigel; Michael E Steinmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A GABRB3 promoter haplotype associated with childhood absence epilepsy impairs transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Lydia Urak; Martha Feucht; Nahid Fathi; Kurt Hornik; Karoline Fuchs
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Angelman syndrome reviewed from a neurophysiological perspective. The UBE3A-GABRB3 hypothesis.

Authors:  B Dan; S G Boyd
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.947

7.  Mice lacking the beta3 subunit of the GABAA receptor have the epilepsy phenotype and many of the behavioral characteristics of Angelman syndrome.

Authors:  T M DeLorey; A Handforth; S G Anagnostaras; G E Homanics; B A Minassian; A Asatourian; M S Fanselow; A Delgado-Escueta; G D Ellison; R W Olsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Mutant GABA(A) receptor subunits in genetic (idiopathic) epilepsy.

Authors:  Shinichi Hirose
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Crystal structure of a human GABAA receptor.

Authors:  Paul S Miller; A Radu Aricescu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  De novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathies.

Authors:  Andrew S Allen; Samuel F Berkovic; Patrick Cossette; Norman Delanty; Dennis Dlugos; Evan E Eichler; Michael P Epstein; Tracy Glauser; David B Goldstein; Yujun Han; Erin L Heinzen; Yuki Hitomi; Katherine B Howell; Michael R Johnson; Ruben Kuzniecky; Daniel H Lowenstein; Yi-Fan Lu; Maura R Z Madou; Anthony G Marson; Heather C Mefford; Sahar Esmaeeli Nieh; Terence J O'Brien; Ruth Ottman; Slavé Petrovski; Annapurna Poduri; Elizabeth K Ruzzo; Ingrid E Scheffer; Elliott H Sherr; Christopher J Yuskaitis; Bassel Abou-Khalil; Brian K Alldredge; Jocelyn F Bautista; Samuel F Berkovic; Alex Boro; Gregory D Cascino; Damian Consalvo; Patricia Crumrine; Orrin Devinsky; Dennis Dlugos; Michael P Epstein; Miguel Fiol; Nathan B Fountain; Jacqueline French; Daniel Friedman; Eric B Geller; Tracy Glauser; Simon Glynn; Sheryl R Haut; Jean Hayward; Sandra L Helmers; Sucheta Joshi; Andres Kanner; Heidi E Kirsch; Robert C Knowlton; Eric H Kossoff; Rachel Kuperman; Ruben Kuzniecky; Daniel H Lowenstein; Shannon M McGuire; Paul V Motika; Edward J Novotny; Ruth Ottman; Juliann M Paolicchi; Jack M Parent; Kristen Park; Annapurna Poduri; Ingrid E Scheffer; Renée A Shellhaas; Elliott H Sherr; Jerry J Shih; Rani Singh; Joseph Sirven; Michael C Smith; Joseph Sullivan; Liu Lin Thio; Anu Venkat; Eileen P G Vining; Gretchen K Von Allmen; Judith L Weisenberg; Peter Widdess-Walsh; Melodie R Winawer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

1.  De Novo Mutations in SLC1A2 and CACNA1A Are Important Causes of Epileptic Encephalopathies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Current Treatment Options for Early-Onset Pediatric Epileptic Encephalopathies.

Authors:  Rolla Shbarou
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Ion Channels in Genetic Epilepsy: From Genes and Mechanisms to Disease-Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Julia Oyrer; Snezana Maljevic; Ingrid E Scheffer; Samuel F Berkovic; Steven Petrou; Christopher A Reid
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Mutations in GABRB3: From febrile seizures to epileptic encephalopathies.

Authors:  Rikke S Møller; Thomas V Wuttke; Ingo Helbig; Carla Marini; Katrine M Johannesen; Eva H Brilstra; Ulvi Vaher; Ingo Borggraefe; Inga Talvik; Tiina Talvik; Gerhard Kluger; Laurence L Francois; Gaetan Lesca; Julitta de Bellescize; Susanne Blichfeldt; Nicolas Chatron; Nils Holert; Julia Jacobs; Marielle Swinkels; Cornelia Betzler; Steffen Syrbe; Marina Nikanorova; Candace T Myers; Line H G Larsen; Sabina Vejzovic; Manuela Pendziwiat; Sarah von Spiczak; Sarah Hopkins; Holly Dubbs; Yuan Mang; Konstantin Mukhin; Hans Holthausen; Koen L van Gassen; Hans A Dahl; Niels Tommerup; Heather C Mefford; Guido Rubboli; Renzo Guerrini; Johannes R Lemke; Holger Lerche; Hiltrud Muhle; Snezana Maljevic
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Functional genomics of epilepsy-associated mutations in the GABAA receptor subunits reveal that one mutation impairs function and two are catastrophic.

Authors:  Nathan L Absalom; Philip K Ahring; Vivian W Liao; Thomas Balle; Tian Jiang; Lyndsey L Anderson; Jonathon C Arnold; Iain S McGregor; Michael T Bowen; Mary Chebib
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Altered inhibitory synapses in de novo GABRA5 and GABRA1 mutations associated with early onset epileptic encephalopathies.

Authors:  Ciria C Hernandez; Wenshu XiangWei; Ningning Hu; Dingding Shen; Wangzhen Shen; Andre H Lagrange; Yujia Zhang; Lifang Dai; Changhong Ding; Zhaohui Sun; Jiasheng Hu; Hongmin Zhu; Yuwu Jiang; Robert L Macdonald
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Customized multigene panels in epilepsy: the best things come in small packages.

Authors:  Simona Pellacani; Claudia Dosi; Giulia Valvo; Francesca Moro; Serena Mero; Federico Sicca; Filippo Maria Santorelli
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.660

Review 8.  Modeling epileptic spasms during infancy: Are we heading for the treatment yet?

Authors:  Libor Velíšek; Jana Velíšková
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 12.310

9.  Characterization of the GABRB2-Associated Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Christelle M El Achkar; Merle Harrer; Lacey Smith; McKenna Kelly; Sumaiya Iqbal; Snezana Maljevic; Cristina E Niturad; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Annapurna Poduri; Edward Yang; Dennis Lal; Holger Lerche; Rikke S Møller; Heather E Olson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 11.274

Review 10.  Genome annotation for clinical genomic diagnostics: strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Charles A Steward; Alasdair P J Parker; Berge A Minassian; Sanjay M Sisodiya; Adam Frankish; Jennifer Harrow
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.