| Literature DB >> 26645240 |
Angela W Chan1, Pascal Mercier2, Daniel Schiller3, Robert Bailey4, Sarah Robbins4, Dean T Eurich5, Michael B Sawyer6, David Broadhurst7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolomics has shown promise in gastric cancer (GC) detection. This research sought to identify whether GC has a unique urinary metabolomic profile compared with benign gastric disease (BN) and healthy (HE) patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26645240 PMCID: PMC4716538 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Baseline characteristics of the study subjects and tumour
| Number of patients | 40 | 43 | 40 |
| Mean age (s.d.), years | 63.1 (9.0) | 65.2 (12.0) | 63.2 (8.8) |
| Gender (male/female) | 19/21 | 28/15 | 23/17 |
| Mean BMI (s.d.), kg m−2 | 29.5 (6.4) | 27.6 (6.9) | 27.7 (4.7) |
| Positive/negative/unknown | 3/21/16 | 7/26/10 | — |
| Gastritis only | 13 (32.5%) | — | — |
| Ulcer only | 4 (10.0%) | — | — |
| Gastritis and ulcer | 1 (2.5%) | — | — |
| Gastritis and portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) | 1 (2.5%) | — | — |
| PHG | 9 (22.5%) | — | — |
| Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) | 3 (7.5%) | — | — |
| Varices | 1 (2.5%) | — | — |
| Polyps | 5 (12.5%) | — | — |
| Reactive gastropathy | 1 (2.5%) | — | — |
| Normal scope with GI symptoms | 2 (5.0%) | — | — |
| Ia/b | — | 3/3 | — |
| IIa/b | — | 8/3 | — |
| IIIa/b/c | — | 2/5/3 | — |
| IV | — | 14 | — |
| Unknown | — | 2 | — |
| GE junction/cardia/fundus/body/antrum/pylorus | — | 6/1/4/15/16/1 | — |
| Diffuse/intestinal/mixed/not specified | — | 15/16/3/9 | — |
| Well/moderate/moderate to poor/poor/not reported | — | 3/8/5/29/3 | — |
| — | 28/15 | — | |
| Neoadjuvant (yes/no) | — | 10/18 | — |
| Adjuvant (yes/no) | — | 18/10 | — |
Abbreviations: BMI=body mass index; BN, benign gastric disease; GC=gastric cancer; GE=gastro-oesophageal; GI=gastrointestinal; HE=healthy; TNM=tumour, node, metastasis.
Figure 1Biplot of log Blue circles represent metabolites significantly changed in both models; red squares, significantly changed in GC vs HE only; green triangles, significantly changed in BN vs HE only.
Figure 2Three-metabolite logistic regression model. (A) Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for GC vs HE comparison based on three-metabolite model. Area under the curve (AUC) is 0.95 (95% CI=0.86–0.99). For a fixed specificity of 80%, the sensitivity is 95% (95% CI=0.85–1.00). (B) Frequency histogram for logistic regression model scores. Yellow bars represent HE patients; red, BN patients; and black, GC patients. The number (frequency) of patients with each score is depicted by the height of the bars. Scores closer to 1 indicate a high probability of GC; close to 0 indicates high probability of HE. Cutoff boundary is score 0.3. Above 0.3, classified as GC; below, not GC.