Literature DB >> 26645238

Low stromal Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell density is associated with complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

M J McCoy1,2, C Hemmings3,4, T J Miller1,4, S J Austin1, M K Bulsara5, N Zeps1,4, A K Nowak2,6, R A Lake2, C F Platell1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a vital role in preventing autoimmunity, but also suppress antitumour immune responses. Tumour infiltration by Tregs has strong prognostic significance in colorectal cancer, and accumulating evidence suggests that chemotherapy and radiotherapy efficacy has an immune-mediated component. Whether Tregs play an inhibitory role in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response in rectal cancer remains unknown.
METHODS: Foxp3+, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and IL-17+ cell density in post-CRT surgical samples from 128 patients with rectal cancer was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between T-cell subset densities and clinical outcome (tumour regression and survival) was evaluated.
RESULTS: Stromal Foxp3+ cell density was strongly associated with tumour regression grade (P=0.0006). A low stromal Foxp3+ cell density was observed in 84% of patients who had a pathologic complete response (pCR) compared with 41% of patients who did not (OR: 7.56, P=0.0005; OR: 5.27, P=0.006 after adjustment for presurgery clinical factors). Low stromal Foxp3+ cell density was also associated with improved recurrence-free survival (HR: 0.46, P=0.03), although not independent of tumour regression grade.
CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory T cells in the tumour microenvironment may inhibit response to neoadjuvant CRT and may represent a therapeutic target in rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645238      PMCID: PMC4702002          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used in locally advanced rectal cancer to reduce tumour volume, making it more amenable to resection, and to decrease the risk of local recurrence (Bosset ; Gerard ; Sauer ). Although neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery is now standard treatment in many centres around the world, response to CRT varies considerably between individuals. Pathological complete response (pCR), defined as no remaining viable tumour cells in the surgical specimen on histopathologic assessment, is obtained in ∼20% of patients, and is associated with a reduced risk of distant recurrence and improved long-term survival (de Campos-Lobato ; Martin ; Zorcolo ). However, ∼40% of patients experience only mild to moderate tumour regression, or even no regression following neoadjuvant CRT (Huebner ; Agarwal ; Fokas ), and factors associated with CRT response remain poorly understood. The presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is associated with improved clinical outcome in many cancers (Cho ; Zhang ; Hiraoka ; Loi ). In colorectal cancer, the density of tumour-infiltrating T cells is a strong prognostic indicator, even after adjustment for clinical and molecular risk factors (Pages ; Galon ; Nosho ). The recently developed Immunoscore, which involves assessment of T-cell density in the central tumour and invasive margin based on expression of pairs of T-cell markers (CD3 and CD8, CD3 and CD45RO or CD8 and CD45RO) (Pages ), may be more prognostic than histopathologic TNM stage for patients with stage I–III disease (Mlecnik ), and is currently undergoing international validation with a view to its incorporation into routine histopathologic practice (Galon ). In rectal cancer, the CD3/CD8 Immunoscore is independently prognostic in patients treated with surgery alone (Anitei ). The intratumoural or peritumoural density of total T cells and CD8 T cells has been almost universally associated with good prognosis, whereas tumour infiltration by Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) is associated with poorer outcome in most solid cancers (reviewed in Fridman ). This is consistent with their well-established role as suppressors of the antitumour immune response (reviewed in Zou 2006). However, in colorectal cancer, the presence of Foxp3+ cells in the local tumour microenvironment has been associated with good prognosis in several independent studies (Salama ; Correale ; Frey ). One explanation for apparent paradox is that expansion of Tregs within the tumour occurs in response to the activation and expansion of tumour-specific CD8+ T cells, thereby representing an indirect measure of an antitumour immune response. The strong positive correlation between CD8+ and Foxp3+ TILs in colorectal cancer supports this theory (Michel ; Frey ; Yoon ), as does the association between Foxp3+ TILs and good prognosis in oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, seen only in patients who also had a high density of CD8+ TILs (West ). Alternatively, Tregs may limit the tumourigenic effects of Th17 cell-mediated inflammation (Liu ; Tosolini ). There is now abundant evidence that both chemotherapy and radiotherapy can enhance antitumour immunity through a variety of mechanisms (Nowak ; Ghiringhelli ; Zhang ; Ramakrishnan ; Burnette ; Gupta ; Kim ). Notably, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the radiosensitising agent currently used in neoadjuvant CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer, has been shown to induce immunogenic tumour cell death (Frey ), and selective Treg depletion has been reported in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer following 5-FU-based chemotherapy (Maeda ). Modulation of T-cell subsets may therefore play a significant role in response to neoadjuvant CRT. Indeed, high CD3 and CD8 expression in pretreatment rectal cancer biopsy samples is associated with tumour regression following CRT (Yasuda ; Anitei ), and radioresponsiveness has an immune-mediated component in animal models of colon, breast and other solid cancers (Apetoh ; Liang ; Gerber ). In breast cancer, the disappearance of Tregs following neoadjuvant CRT is associated with complete pathological response (Ladoire ). However, the impact of Tregs in the local tumour microenvironment during standard long-course CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer remains unknown. In the current study we evaluated the density of Foxp3+, CD3+ CD8+, CD4+ and IL-17+ cells in surgical resection samples from 128 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with long-course 5-FU-based CRT. Our a priori hypotheses were that response to CRT has an immune-mediated component and that Tregs play an inhibitory role.

Materials and methods

Patients, treatment and follow-up

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma at our institution between August 2006 and December 2010, and who gave written informed consent for their biospecimens and health information to be used for research purposes, were identified from our prospectively maintained database. The consent rate for research participation at our institution is 98%. Clinical tumour and nodal stage (cT and cN), and the presence or absence of distant metastases (cM) was determined by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before commencement of CRT. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy consisted of 50.4 Gy administered in 28 fractions over 5 weeks. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was given concurrently via intravenous infusion 5-FU or oral capecitabine (Xeloda, Roche Products Pty Ltd, Dee Why, NSW, Australia). Surgical resection of the primary tumour was performed a minimum of 4 weeks after completing neoadjuvant treatment (6–8 weeks post CRT in most cases). Fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to all patients (including those who attained a pCR), as per current Australian guidelines (ACN (Australian Cancer Network) Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee, 2005), and was administered for up to 6 months postoperatively. Patients with distant metastases were progressively managed with neoadjuvant CRT, rectal surgery, potentially curative resection of metastatic lesions where possible and adjuvant chemotherapy. Follow-up included 6-monthly visits, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) blood test and digital rectal examination. At 12-monthly intervals, patients had a repeat CT scan. A colonoscopy was performed at 12 months and then 4 years. Survival information was obtained from the Western Australian Cancer Registry every 6 months. Surviving patients were censored at the date of last survival update (1 May 2015). Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was defined as the time between the date of surgery and date of death from colorectal cancer. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time between the date of surgery and the date of first recurrence (local recurrence, development of first distant metastases or development of recurrent distant metastases after potentially curative resection) or date of death from colorectal cancer without prior documented recurrence (patients with unresected metastatic disease). The study was approved by the St John of God Healthcare Human Research Ethics Committee and access to state cancer registry data was approved by the Department of Health Western Australia. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Histopathologic assessment

Tumour regression grading was performed as part of routine pathological review using the Dworak system (Dworak ), whereby grade 4 corresponds to pCR and grade 0 to no regression. Other variables obtained from the pathology report were pathologic T stage (ypT), pathologic N stage (ypN), resection margin status (R status), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), extramural venous invasion (EMVI) and perineural invasion (PNI).

Construction of tissue microarrays (TMAs)

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour samples and corresponding H&E slides were retrieved from the institutional pathology archive. A specialist gastrointestinal histopathologist (CH) reviewed the slides, verifying Dworak grade and selecting target areas of tumour and stroma. Tumour areas (Dworak 0–3 patients only) targeted central tumour, or residual malignant glands/tumour nests, depending on the degree of response. For the stromal cores, an area of nonepithelial tissue adjacent to the residual tumour was selected. In cases of pCR, areas within the fibrotic irradiated tumour bed, judged to most accurately represent the tumour stroma, were selected. Cylindrical tissue cores 1 mm in diameter were punched from the target area and inserted into a recipient paraffin block using an MTA-1 manual tissue arrayer (Beecher Instruments, Estigen, Tartu, Estonia). For each case, two tumour cores (where available), two stromal cores and one core of normal colonic epithelium (taken from a separate block of normal tissue) were included. Sections 4 μm in thickness were cut from the TMAs and mounted on positively charged slides for H&E staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Immunohistochemistry

Staining for Foxp3, CD8 and IL-17 was performed manually. Manual staining protocols were carefully optimised with regard to antigen-retrieval, primary antibody concentration/incubation time and optimal detection system before staining the TMAs. Sections were dewaxed and rehydrated through graded xylene and alcohol washes. Antigen retrieval was performed in a DakoCytomation pressure cooker (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) at 121 °C for 6 min in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0). Peroxidase blocking solution (CINtec Histology Kit; Roche Australia, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. For Foxp3 and CD8 staining, sections were incubated with serum-free protein block (Dako) for 10 min, followed by the primary antibody (Foxp3 clone 236A/E7; Abcam, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 1 : 100 dilution for 60 min or CD8 clone C8/144B; Dako, 1 : 100 dilution for 30 min). After washing in TBS-Tween, sections were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody for 30 min (CINtec Histology Kit), washed again in TBS-Tween and incubated with DAB solution (CINtec Histology Kit). The IL-17 staining was performed using a goat polyclonal anti-human IL-17 antibody (R&D Systems, Burlingame, MN, USA, 1 μg ml−1 diluted in blocking serum for 60 min) and an avidin/biotin system (Avidin/Biotin Blocking Kit, Vectastain Elite ABC kit and ImmPACT DAB; all from Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. CD3 and CD4 staining was performed on an Autostainer Link 48 (Dako) using the EnVision FLEX+ high pH visualisation system (Dako). Rehydration and antigen-retrieval steps were performed in a PT Link pretreatment module (Dako). Primary antibodies used were a rabbit polyclonal anti-human CD3 and a mouse monoclonal anti-human CD4 clone 4B12 (both from Dako FLEX, ready-to-use). Each TMA was stained on two separate occasions for each marker of interest. One staining run was selected as the primary run for analysis, based on overall staining quality. For cases where staining was judged to be inadequate (primarily because of detachment or folding of cores), the core from the alternative run was analysed where available. For triple staining, an alkaline phosphatase (AP) and HRP multiplex detection system was used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA, USA). Following our standard antigen-retrieval process described above, sections were incubated for 15 min with a universal blocking reagent (Background Sniper), then for 30 min with a CD4/CD8 ready-to-use multiplex cocktail (Biocare Medical). Endogenous peroxidase was then blocked using Peroxidazed 1 and antibody detection was performed using the MACH 2 Doublestain 2 system with Betazoid DAB and Warp Red (Biocare Medical). Sections were then washed and incubated for 60 min with the primary Foxp3 antibody (clone 236A/E7; Abcam). Detection was performed using MACH 2 mouse HRP polymer and Vina Green. All triple stain reagents other than the Foxp3 antibody were purchased from Biocare Medical. All sections were lightly counterstained in Mayers haematoxylin (Hurst Scientific, Perth, WA, Australia) before dehydration and mounting. Sections of human tonsil were included as positive and negative controls in every staining run. An isotype control was used in place of the primary antibody on negative control sections.

Assessment of T-cell density

Slides were scanned using a high-resolution digital scanner (Aperio Scanscope XT; Leica Biosystems, North Ryde, NSW, Australia) at × 40 magnification. Evaluation of T-cell density (cells per mm2 tissue) was performed using image analysis software (Aperio Imagescope version 11; Leica Biosystems) after careful manual annotation of the cores to ensure that the area of analysis matched the histology type to which the core was assigned, and to exclude areas of damaged or missing tissue. Data presented represent the average of two cores where possible.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Differences in T-cell density between response groups were assessed using general linear models. Associations between clinical/immunological variables and pCR were assessed using logistic regression. Time-to-event outcomes (CSS and RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method with curves compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression (Cox, 1972). Multivariate analyses were performed using backwards stepwise selection of variables P<0.2 in univariate analysis. Differences and associations were considered statistically significant where P<0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics and treatment response

A total of 135 eligible patients were identified. Samples from 128 of these patients were included in the TMAs. Reasons for exclusion included concurrent malignancy (one patient), prior polypectomy of the primary tumour (one patient), minimal neoadjuvant treatment received (one patient) and insufficient or unavailable material (four patients). Characteristics of the 128 patients are shown in Table 1. Mean age at the time of surgery was 63 years and 72% were male. The majority of patients (81%) were clinical T stage 3 and 74% were assessed as having nodal involvement on pretreatment CT scan and MRI. Eleven patients (9%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. This included lesions in the liver (eight patients), lung (one patient), liver and lung (one patient) and peritoneal disease (one patient). The median interval between the end of CRT and surgery was 7 weeks. One elderly patient (93 years of age) elected to have neoadjuvant long-course radiotherapy (RT) without concurrent chemotherapy. The most commonly performed surgical procedures performed were ultra-low anterior resection (67%) and abdominoperineal resection (27%). Other procedures included low anterior resection (three patients), Hartmann's procedure (two patients) and total colectomy (two patients). Of the 11 patients with distant metastases, 5 underwent resection of liver/lung lesions and 1 patient with liver metastases received selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

 n=128
Age, mean (s.d.)63 (12.3)
Sex, n (%)
Male92 (71.9)
Female36 (28.1)
Distance from anal verge (cm), mean (s.d.)7 (3.7)
Weeks between end CRT and surgery, median (IQR)7 (6, 8)
Pretreatment clinical T stage, n (%)
cT28 (6.3)
cT3104 (81.3)
cT414 (10.9)
NR2 (1.6)
Pretreatment clinical N stage, n (%)
cN031 (24.2)
cN1–295 (73.6)
NR2 (1.6)
Pretreatment clinical M stage, n (%)
cM0115 (89.8)
cM1-211 (8.6)
NR2 (1.6)
Dworak grade, n (%)
4 (pCR)26 (20.3)
346 (35.9)
247 (36.7)
19 (7.0)
Pathologic T stage, n (%)
ypT027a (21.1)
ypTis/T19 (7.0)
ypT231 (24.2)
ypT356 (43.8)
ypT44 (3.1)
ypTxb1 (0.8)
Pathologic N stage, n (%)
ypN090 (70.3)
ypN1–238 (29.7)
Resection margin status, n (%)
R0123 (96.1)
R1–25 (3.9)
Lymphovascular invasion, n (%)
Yes11 (8.6)
No117 (91.4)
Perineural invasion, n (%)
Yes21 (16.4)
No107 (83.6)
Extramural venous invasion, n (%)
Yes9 (7.0)
No119 (93.0)

Abbreviations: CRT=chemoradiotherapy; IQR=interquartile range; NR=not recorded; pCR=pathologic complete response; Tis=carcinoma in situ.

One Dworak grade 3 patient had no residual tumour in bowel, but 5/15 nodes positive.

Small clusters of malignant cells present in resection doughnut.

In all, 26 patients (20%) achieved a pCR (Dworak grade 4) following neoadjuvant CRT (Table 1). In addition, 46 patients (36%) were assigned Dworak grade 3, 47 patients (37%) Dworak grade 2 and 9 patients (7%) Dworak grade 1. No patient was classed as Dworak grade 0.

T-cell subsets in the tumour microenvironment after CRT

Foxp3+, CD3+, CD8+, CD4+ and IL-17+ cells were identified in the tumour, the stroma and the normal epithelium cores following CRT (Figure 1). The density of Foxp3+ cells was highest in the tumour cores, followed by the normal cores and then the stroma (median 125 vs 88 vs 28 cells per mm2 respectively; Figure 1B). We observed a similar distribution of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, with IL-17+ cells most abundant in or around the normal epithelium (median 12 vs 11 vs 29 in tumour vs stroma vs normal cores; Figure 1B). To further characterise Foxp3+ cells, we performed concurrent staining for CD4, CD8 and Foxp3 using a multiplex IHC system. Manual scoring of a subset of 25 stromal cores, selected to include a range of Foxp3+ cell densities, demonstrated, as expected, that 99% of Foxp3+ cells with visible surface staining were CD4+ (Figure 1A, and data not shown).
Figure 1

Identification of T-cell subsets. (A) Representative immunohistochemical staining of stromal cores for Foxp3 (top left), CD3 (top centre), CD4 (top right), CD8 (bottom left), IL-17 (bottom centre) and multiplex detection of Foxp3 (green), CD4 (brown) and CD8 (pink) (bottom right). Arrows indicate CD4+Foxp3+ cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Frequencies of Foxp3+, CD4+, CD8+ and IL-17+ cells in tumour (Dworak 1–3 patients only), stroma and normal cores. Line at median. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Low stromal Foxp3+ T-cell density is associated with response to CRT

Analysis of T-cell subset density by Dworak grade revealed a strong inverse correlation between Foxp3+ cell density in the stroma and tumour regression (P=0.0006; Figure 2A). Of patients who had a pCR, 84% had a stromal Foxp3+ cell density lower than the median value as compared with 41% of noncomplete responders (OR: 7.56, P=0.0005; Figure 2B and Table 2). Stromal Foxp3+ cell density was strongly correlated with stromal CD3+ and CD4+ T-cell density, consistent with the co-expression of these molecules on Tregs (Supplementary Figure 1). A significant positive correlation was also observed between Foxp3+ and CD8+ cells in the stroma, the tumour and the normal cores. Foxp3+ and IL-17+ cell density positively correlated in the normal mucosa, but not in the tumour or stroma, where no significant correlation was seen (Supplementary Figure 1, and data not shown).
Figure 2

Low stromal Foxp3 (A) Stromal Foxp3+ cell density by Dworak grade (P=0.0006; general linear model). Circles represent outliers using Tukey's method (> the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times the interquartile range). (B) Low vs high stromal Foxp3+ cell density (split at the median value) by pCR (P=0.0005; logistic regression). ***P<0.001.

Table 2

Relationship between stromal T-cell densities and pCR adjusting for presurgery clinical and demographic factors

 Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
 OR95% CIPOR95% CIP
Foxp3
High1.00  1.00  
Low7.562.41–23.650.00055.271.62–17.160.0058
CD3
High1.00     
Low2.971.13–7.790.0270   
CD4
High1.00     
Low3.111.11–8.730.0312   
CD8
High1.00     
Low1.880.78–4.540.1615   
IL-17
High1.00     
Low2.310.91–5.840.0780   
Age
<65 Years1.00     
⩾65 Years1.040.44–2.460.9289   
Sex
Male1.00     
Female1.470.59–3.690.4111   
Distance from anal verge
<7 cm1.00     
⩾7 cm0.820.35–1.950.6547   
Pretreatment clinical T stage
cT41.00 0.0839   
cT33.290.41–26.58    
cT213.001.11–152.4    
Pretreatment clinical N stage
cN1–21.00     
cN00.680.23–1.980.4774   
Pretreatment clinical M stage
cM1–21.00     
cM01.190.24–5.860.8335   
Interval between CRT and surgery
⩽7 Weeks1.00     
>7 Weeks1.250.52–3.010.6223   

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CRT=chemoradiotherapy; Foxp3=forkhead box P3; IL-17=interleukin 17; OR=odds ratio; pCR=pathologic complete response.

Variables included in multivariate analysis: stromal Foxp3, CD3, CD4 and cT stage.

Stromal Foxp3+ cell density was the only variable independently associated with pCR in multivariate analysis (OR: 5.27, P=0.0058; Table 2). Although low total T-cell and CD4+ T-cell densities were also associated with pCR in univariate analysis, these associations were no longer significant after adjustment for Foxp3+ T-cell density and presurgery clinical and demographic factors (Table 2). The ratio between Foxp3+ Tregs and other T-cell subsets was also investigated, but no correlation with CRT response was stronger than for stromal Foxp3+ cell density alone. No association between tumour regression grade and the density of Foxp3+ Tregs, or other T-cell subsets, in the tumour (available for Dworak 1–3 patients only) or normal cores was found (Supplementary Figure 2A and B, and data not shown). However, there was no significant correlation between the density of Foxp3+ Tregs in the stroma and that in the tumour or normal cores (Supplementary Figure 2C and D).

Foxp3+ T-cell density as a prognostic marker in neoadjuvantly treated rectal cancer

A total of 104 patients (81%) were alive on the censor date and median follow-up was 76 months from the date of surgery. There were 4 deaths from causes other than colorectal cancer during the follow-up period (1 in each of Dworak 1, 2, 3 and 4 groups). Of these patients, 92 (72%) remained alive without disease recurrence. Only 3 patients (2.3%) had a local recurrence (2 in the Dworak grade 2 and 1 in the Dworak grade 3 groups), and in 1 case this was preceded by development of liver metastases. Median time to disease recurrence was 15.2 months (range 1.9–53 months). Distant recurrence events included development of new metastases (26 patients) and recurrence of previously resected metastatic disease (2 patients). There were no deaths from rectal cancer in the Dworak 4 group (pCR). Dworak grade was significantly associated with both CSS and RFS (Figure 3A and B and Table 3). Stromal Foxp3+ cell density was also significantly associated with survival; the probability of 5-year CSS and RFS being 92% vs 81% and 80% vs 63% in the Foxp3 low vs high groups respectively (Figure 3C and D and Table 3). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for clinical and pathologic variables, cM status, Dworak grade and the presence or absence of PNI were significantly associated with RFS (Table 3). When the analysis was limited to patients without distant metastases at time of primary surgery, Dworak grade and resection margin status were the only independent prognostic factors (data not shown). No statistically significant interactions between variables included in the multivariate analyses were observed.
Figure 3

Survival by Dworak grade and stromal Foxp3 Kaplan–Meier estimates for cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival by (A and B) Dworak grade and (C and D) stromal Foxp3+ cell density. Groups compared using the log-rank test. *Test for trend.

Table 3

Recurrence-free survival according to stromal Foxp3+ cell density and clinicopathological factors

 Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
 HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Foxp3
High1.00     
Low0.460.23–0.920.0288   
Dworak grade
1–4a0.550.37–0.820.00310.610.39–0.950.0300
Age (years)
<651.00     
⩾650.830.43–1.590.5669   
Sex
Male1.00     
Female0.680.31–1.500.3414   
Distance from anal verge
<7 cm1.00     
⩾7 cm0.810.42–1.560.5329   
Pretreatment clinical T stage
cT41.00 0.0554   
cT30.390.17–0.90    
cT20.180.02–1.44    
Pretreatment clinical N stage
cN1–21.00     
cN01.350.65–2.830.4226   
Pretreatment clinical M stage
cM1–21.00  1.00  
cM00.200.09–0.44<0.00010.280.12–0.660.0038
Interval between CRT and surgery
⩽7 Weeks1.00     
>7 Weeks0.920.48–1.770.8101   
Post-treatment pathologic T stage
ypT3–41.00 0.0006   
ypTis/ypT1/ypT20.260.11–0.64    
ypT00.180.06–0.60    
Post-treatment pathologic N stage
ypN1–21.00     
ypN00.450.23–0.870.0181   
Resection margin status
R1–21.00     
R00.210.07–0.600.0035   
Lymphovascular invasion
Yes1.00     
No1.620.39–6.730.5091   
Perineural invasion
Yes1.00  1.00  
No0.280.14–0.570.00040.410.19–0.900.0252
Extramural venous invasion
Yes1.00     
No0.250.10–0.610.0021   

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CRT=chemoradiotherapy; Foxp3=forkhead box P3; HR=hazard ratio; Tis=carcinoma in situ.

Variables included in the multivariate analysis: stromal Foxp3, Dworak, cT, cM, ypT, ypN, R status, perineural invasion and extramural venous invasion.

Trend analysis.

Discussion

This study investigated the relationship between Foxp3+ Treg density in the local tumour microenvironment following neoadjuvant CRT and treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer. Given the increasing evidence for an immune-mediated component to chemotherapy and radiotherapy efficacy (Apetoh ; Ladoire ; Yasuda ; Liang ; Anitei ; Gerber ), and the well-established role of Tregs as suppressors of antitumour immunity, we hypothesised that Tregs inhibit the response of rectal carcinomas to neoadjuvant CRT. We report a strong inverse correlation between stromal Foxp3+ cell density and tumour regression following CRT. Patients with a low stromal Foxp3+ cell density were over 5 times more likely to have a pCR, after adjustment for pretreatment clinical and demographic factors. Stromal Foxp3+ density was also significantly associated with improved RFS in univariate analysis. Although stromal Foxp3+ cell density was not independently prognostic in multivariate analysis, Dworak grade remained significantly associated with RFS, after adjustment for clinical and pathological variables, highlighting the clinical significance of response to CRT, even in the context of potentially curative resection. In a recent study, Shinto ) found post-CRT stromal CD8+ T-cell density to be associated with improved RFS and CSS in a cohort of 93 rectal cancer patients who received short-course CRT (20 Gy given over 5 days with concurrent uracil over 7 days) and surgery 30 days later. They also assessed Foxp3+ cell density in resection samples, and found no significant association with survival. However, CD8/Foxp3 ratio in pre-CRT biopsies was predictive of improved tumour regression. An important difference between this and the current study is treatment schedule. Complete response is less common after short-course CRT (just 3% of the cohort studied by Shinto ) were classed as Dworak grade 4), and tumour regression can continue for up to 12 weeks post CRT (Glimelius, 2014). As such, although highlighting the potential importance of local antitumour immunity in rectal cancer response to CRT, these results may not be relevant to long-course CRT. The negative association between the presence of Foxp3+ Tregs and clinical outcome observed in this study appears contrary to several studies in colorectal cancer, including our own previous work (Salama ; Correale ; Frey ) that have demonstrated a positive association between Foxp3+ TILS and prognosis. However, the majority of samples assessed in these previous studies were from chemo/radiotherapy-naive colon cancer patients. Multiple preclinical studies have now demonstrated that radiotherapy efficacy requires an intact immune system and that tumour radioresponsiveness is associated with dendritic cell activation and CD8-driven antitumour immunity (Apetoh ; Gupta ; Liang ; Gerber ). Similar to many other chemotherapy drugs, 5-FU induces HMGB1 release from tumour cells, one of the major hallmarks of immunogenic cell death (Frey ), and may preferentially deplete Tregs over other T-cell subsets (Maeda ). If tumour regression following CRT in rectal cancer is, at least in part, due to CRT-induced antitumour immunity, it is rational that Tregs may play an antagonistic role. The density of tumour-infiltrating T cells, and more specifically, CD8+ T cells, is a strong indicator of improved survival in colorectal cancer (Pages ; Nosho ; Mlecnik ), and in rectal cancer biopsies, CD8 T-cell density predicts the likelihood of tumour regression following CRT (Yasuda ; Anitei ). Therefore, the association between low stromal CD3+ (and CD4+) cell density and pCR found in the current study seems counterintuitive. It is possible that a higher density of lymphocytes in the local tumour microenvironment after CRT in poor responders simply correlates with residual tumour burden. However, only Foxp3+ cell density was independently associated with treatment response in this study, indicating that the presence of Tregs is specifically important. Given the strong association between tumour regression and stromal Foxp3+ Treg density observed, it is perhaps surprising that we found no association between tumour regression and Treg density in the tumour cores. Selection of truly representative target areas is a challenge common to all studies using TMAs, and can be particularly difficult when using tissue from pretreated patients with significant variation in treatment response. Although target sites were carefully selected by an experienced specialist gastrointestinal pathologist, we cannot exclude the possibility that the lack of correlation between Treg density in the stromal and tumour cores (for Dworak grade 1–3 patients) may be a function of target site selection. However, ours is not the first study to find T-cell subsets in the stromal compartment to be most strongly associated with outcome (Tougeron ; Vayrynen ; Mei ), and importantly, the strongest association observed in the current study was between low stromal Treg density and pCR, the patient group for whom tumour cores were not available. Our data support the hypothesis that response to CRT in rectal cancer is partially immune-mediated and inhibited by the presence of Tregs. It is possible that Tregs are selectively depleted in responding patients during CRT, providing a window of opportunity for the initiation of an effective antitumour immune response. Alternatively, fewer Tregs in the local tumour environment before treatment may allow for effective CRT-induced antitumour immunity. Which of these scenarios is most likely cannot be deduced from our data. We plan to answer this question by evaluating Treg density in pre-CRT biopsies in conjunction with subsequent surgical specimens. If Tregs do limit tumour regression following CRT in rectal cancer, response rates may potentially be improved by combining current neoadjuvant regimens with an immune-modulating therapy. Although there is as yet no drug available that selectively depletes Tregs in humans effectively, ‘checkpoint blockade', an approach that aims to stimulate an effective antitumour immune response through blocking inhibitory signals in T cells, has shown major promise in other solid cancers (Postow ) and may be useful in this setting. It is of particular interest in the context of the current study that the anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody, ipilimumab, exerts its immune-stimulating effect, not only through blocking inhibitory signals in effector T cells, but also through inhibiting Treg function (Peggs ; Qureshi ). However, given the important role played by Tregs in maintaining gut homeostasis (Barnes and Powrie, 2009), the timing and mode of delivery of any immune-modulating agent will likely be critical. Indeed, in a murine model of colitis-associated colon cancer (CAC), transient depletion of Tregs during the acute inflammation phase leads to uncontrolled inflammation and death, whereas depletion during the late phase results in enhanced CD8+ T cell-driven antitumour immunity and reduced tumour formation (Pastille ). Clinical trials in this field will therefore require careful design. In summary, we show that low stromal Foxp3+ Treg density post CRT is associated with pCR and improved long-term outcome in locally advanced rectal cancer. Our data suggest that Tregs in the local microenvironment may inhibit the response of rectal carcinomas to neoadjuvant CRT and may represent a therapeutic target in rectal cancer.
  55 in total

1.  Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Franck Pagès; Anne Berger; Matthieu Camus; Fatima Sanchez-Cabo; Anne Costes; Robert Molidor; Bernhard Mlecnik; Amos Kirilovsky; Malin Nilsson; Diane Damotte; Tchao Meatchi; Patrick Bruneval; Paul-Henri Cugnenc; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Combined treatment of human colorectal tumor cell lines with chemotherapeutic agents and ionizing irradiation can in vitro induce tumor cell death forms with immunogenic potential.

Authors:  Benjamin Frey; Christina Stache; Yvonne Rubner; Nina Werthmöller; Kathrin Schulz; Renate Sieber; Sabine Semrau; Franz Rödel; Rainer Fietkau; Udo S Gaipl
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Impact of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer on regulatory T-cells and tumor immunity.

Authors:  Kazunari Maeda; Shoichi Hazama; Kazuhisa Tokuno; Shin Kan; Yoshinari Maeda; Yusaku Watanabe; Ryoji Kamei; Yoshitaro Shindo; Noriko Maeda; Kiyoshi Yoshimura; Shigefumi Yoshino; Masaaki Oka
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Gérard; Thierry Conroy; Franck Bonnetain; Olivier Bouché; Olivier Chapet; Marie-Thérèse Closon-Dejardin; Michel Untereiner; Bernard Leduc; Eric Francois; Jean Maurel; Jean-François Seitz; Bruno Buecher; Rémy Mackiewicz; Michel Ducreux; Laurent Bedenne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Torsten Liersch; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Werner Hohenberger; Clemens Hess; Heinz Becker; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Marie-Therese Villanueva; Helmut Witzigmann; Christian Wittekind; Tim Beissbarth; Claus Rödel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Induction of tumor cell apoptosis in vivo increases tumor antigen cross-presentation, cross-priming rather than cross-tolerizing host tumor-specific CD8 T cells.

Authors:  Anna K Nowak; Richard A Lake; Amanda L Marzo; Bernadette Scott; William R Heath; Edward J Collins; Jeffrey A Frelinger; Bruce W S Robinson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lionel Apetoh; François Ghiringhelli; Antoine Tesniere; Michel Obeid; Carla Ortiz; Alfredo Criollo; Grégoire Mignot; M Chiara Maiuri; Evelyn Ullrich; Patrick Saulnier; Huan Yang; Sebastian Amigorena; Bernard Ryffel; Franck J Barrat; Paul Saftig; Francis Levi; Rosette Lidereau; Catherine Nogues; Jean-Paul Mira; Agnès Chompret; Virginie Joulin; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Jean Bourhis; Fabrice André; Suzette Delaloge; Thomas Tursz; Guido Kroemer; Laurence Zitvogel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Dionyssios Katsaros; Phyllis A Gimotty; Marco Massobrio; Giorgia Regnani; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Heidi Gray; Katia Schlienger; Michael N Liebman; Stephen C Rubin; George Coukos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Density of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes in biopsy samples can be a predictor of pathological response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Koji Yasuda; Takako Nirei; Eiji Sunami; Hirokazu Nagawa; Joji Kitayama
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Tumour-infiltrating inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z Mei; Y Liu; C Liu; A Cui; Z Liang; G Wang; H Peng; L Cui; C Li
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 2: TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Shona Hendry; Roberto Salgado; Thomas Gevaert; Prudence A Russell; Tom John; Bibhusal Thapa; Michael Christie; Koen van de Vijver; M V Estrada; Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Melinda Sanders; Benjamin Solomon; Cinzia Solinas; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Yves Allory; Matthias Preusser; Johannes Hainfellner; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Vingiani; Sandra Demaria; Fraser Symmans; Paolo Nuciforo; Laura Comerma; E A Thompson; Sunil Lakhani; Seong-Rim Kim; Stuart Schnitt; Cecile Colpaert; Christos Sotiriou; Stefan J Scherer; Michail Ignatiadis; Sunil Badve; Robert H Pierce; Giuseppe Viale; Nicolas Sirtaine; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Tomohagu Sugie; Susan Fineberg; Soonmyung Paik; Ashok Srinivasan; Andrea Richardson; Yihong Wang; Ewa Chmielik; Jane Brock; Douglas B Johnson; Justin Balko; Stephan Wienert; Veerle Bossuyt; Stefan Michiels; Nils Ternes; Nicole Burchardi; Stephen J Luen; Peter Savas; Frederick Klauschen; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Carmen Criscitiello; Sandra O'Toole; Denis Larsimont; Roland de Wind; Giuseppe Curigliano; Fabrice André; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Mark van de Vijver; Federico Rojo; Giuseppe Floris; Shahinaz Bedri; Joseph Sparano; David Rimm; Torsten Nielsen; Zuzana Kos; Stephen Hewitt; Baljit Singh; Gelareh Farshid; Sibylle Loibl; Kimberly H Allison; Nadine Tung; Sylvia Adams; Karen Willard-Gallo; Hugo M Horlings; Leena Gandhi; Andre Moreira; Fred Hirsch; Maria V Dieci; Maria Urbanowicz; Iva Brcic; Konstanty Korski; Fabien Gaire; Hartmut Koeppen; Amy Lo; Jennifer Giltnane; Marlon C Rebelatto; Keith E Steele; Jiping Zha; Kenneth Emancipator; Jonathan W Juco; Carsten Denkert; Jorge Reis-Filho; Sherene Loi; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Tumor-infiltrating Treg, MDSC, and IDO expression associated with outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Fangxuan Li; Yang Zhao; Lijuan Wei; Shixia Li; Juntian Liu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  Non-operative management of rectal cancer: understanding tumor biology.

Authors:  Iris H Wei; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes expressing FoxP3, CCR7 or PD-1 predict the outcome of prostate cancer patients subjected to salvage radiotherapy after biochemical relapse.

Authors:  Valerio Nardone; Cirino Botta; Michele Caraglia; Elodia Claudia Martino; Maria Raffaella Ambrosio; Tommaso Carfagno; Paolo Tini; Leonardo Semeraro; Gabriella Misso; Anna Grimaldi; Mariarosaria Boccellino; Gaetano Facchini; Massimiliano Berretta; Gianluca Vischi; Bruno Jim Rocca; Aurora Barone; Pierfrancesco Tassone; Pierosandro Tagliaferri; Maria Teresa Del Vecchio; Luigi Pirtoli; Pierpaolo Correale
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 5.  Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan B Yuval; Hannah M Thompson; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Potential immune priming of the tumor microenvironment with FOLFOX chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Campbell S Roxburgh; Jinru Shia; Efsevia Vakiani; Tanisha Daniel; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 8.110

7.  UEG Week 2020 Poster Presentations.

Authors: 
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Predictive Value of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Chika Mizutani; Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Hiroyuki Tomita; Takao Takahashi; Tomonari Suetsugu; Jesse Yu Tajima; Shigeru Kiyama; Itaru Yasufuku; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Naoki Okumura; Katsutoshi Murase; Manabu Futamura; Masaya Kawaguchi; Takuma Ishihara; Masayuki Matsuo; Tatsuhiko Miyazaki; Akira Hara; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-01-03

9.  Tumor Microenvironment Mediators CD8+- and FOXP3+-Labeled T Lymphocytes Are Prospective Prognosticators in Curatively Treated Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hala Zaghloul; Ahmed Abbas; Dina Abdulah
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2021-03

10.  Relationship between stromal regulatory T cells and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kentaro Sekizawa; Kazuya Nakagawa; Yasushi Ichikawa; Hirokazu Suwa; Mayumi Ozawa; Masashi Momiyama; Atsushi Ishibe; Jun Watanabe; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Ikuma Kato; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.