| Literature DB >> 26645238 |
M J McCoy1,2, C Hemmings3,4, T J Miller1,4, S J Austin1, M K Bulsara5, N Zeps1,4, A K Nowak2,6, R A Lake2, C F Platell1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a vital role in preventing autoimmunity, but also suppress antitumour immune responses. Tumour infiltration by Tregs has strong prognostic significance in colorectal cancer, and accumulating evidence suggests that chemotherapy and radiotherapy efficacy has an immune-mediated component. Whether Tregs play an inhibitory role in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response in rectal cancer remains unknown.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26645238 PMCID: PMC4702002 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Patient characteristics
| Age, mean (s.d.) | 63 (12.3) |
| Male | 92 (71.9) |
| Female | 36 (28.1) |
| Distance from anal verge (cm), mean (s.d.) | 7 (3.7) |
| Weeks between end CRT and surgery, median (IQR) | 7 (6, 8) |
| cT2 | 8 (6.3) |
| cT3 | 104 (81.3) |
| cT4 | 14 (10.9) |
| NR | 2 (1.6) |
| cN0 | 31 (24.2) |
| cN1–2 | 95 (73.6) |
| NR | 2 (1.6) |
| cM0 | 115 (89.8) |
| cM1-2 | 11 (8.6) |
| NR | 2 (1.6) |
| 4 (pCR) | 26 (20.3) |
| 3 | 46 (35.9) |
| 2 | 47 (36.7) |
| 1 | 9 (7.0) |
| ypT0 | 27 |
| ypTis/T1 | 9 (7.0) |
| ypT2 | 31 (24.2) |
| ypT3 | 56 (43.8) |
| ypT4 | 4 (3.1) |
| ypTx | 1 (0.8) |
| ypN0 | 90 (70.3) |
| ypN1–2 | 38 (29.7) |
| R0 | 123 (96.1) |
| R1–2 | 5 (3.9) |
| Yes | 11 (8.6) |
| No | 117 (91.4) |
| Yes | 21 (16.4) |
| No | 107 (83.6) |
| Yes | 9 (7.0) |
| No | 119 (93.0) |
Abbreviations: CRT=chemoradiotherapy; IQR=interquartile range; NR=not recorded; pCR=pathologic complete response; Tis=carcinoma in situ.
One Dworak grade 3 patient had no residual tumour in bowel, but 5/15 nodes positive.
Small clusters of malignant cells present in resection doughnut.
Figure 1Identification of T-cell subsets. (A) Representative immunohistochemical staining of stromal cores for Foxp3 (top left), CD3 (top centre), CD4 (top right), CD8 (bottom left), IL-17 (bottom centre) and multiplex detection of Foxp3 (green), CD4 (brown) and CD8 (pink) (bottom right). Arrows indicate CD4+Foxp3+ cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Frequencies of Foxp3+, CD4+, CD8+ and IL-17+ cells in tumour (Dworak 1–3 patients only), stroma and normal cores. Line at median. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Figure 2Low stromal Foxp3 (A) Stromal Foxp3+ cell density by Dworak grade (P=0.0006; general linear model). Circles represent outliers using Tukey's method (> the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times the interquartile range). (B) Low vs high stromal Foxp3+ cell density (split at the median value) by pCR (P=0.0005; logistic regression). ***P<0.001.
Relationship between stromal T-cell densities and pCR adjusting for presurgery clinical and demographic factors
| High | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Low | 7.56 | 2.41–23.65 | 0.0005 | 5.27 | 1.62–17.16 | 0.0058 |
| High | 1.00 | |||||
| Low | 2.97 | 1.13–7.79 | 0.0270 | |||
| High | 1.00 | |||||
| Low | 3.11 | 1.11–8.73 | 0.0312 | |||
| High | 1.00 | |||||
| Low | 1.88 | 0.78–4.54 | 0.1615 | |||
| High | 1.00 | |||||
| Low | 2.31 | 0.91–5.84 | 0.0780 | |||
| <65 Years | 1.00 | |||||
| ⩾65 Years | 1.04 | 0.44–2.46 | 0.9289 | |||
| Male | 1.00 | |||||
| Female | 1.47 | 0.59–3.69 | 0.4111 | |||
| <7 cm | 1.00 | |||||
| ⩾7 cm | 0.82 | 0.35–1.95 | 0.6547 | |||
| cT4 | 1.00 | 0.0839 | ||||
| cT3 | 3.29 | 0.41–26.58 | ||||
| cT2 | 13.00 | 1.11–152.4 | ||||
| cN1–2 | 1.00 | |||||
| cN0 | 0.68 | 0.23–1.98 | 0.4774 | |||
| cM1–2 | 1.00 | |||||
| cM0 | 1.19 | 0.24–5.86 | 0.8335 | |||
| ⩽7 Weeks | 1.00 | |||||
| >7 Weeks | 1.25 | 0.52–3.01 | 0.6223 | |||
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CRT=chemoradiotherapy; Foxp3=forkhead box P3; IL-17=interleukin 17; OR=odds ratio; pCR=pathologic complete response.
Variables included in multivariate analysis: stromal Foxp3, CD3, CD4 and cT stage.
Figure 3Survival by Dworak grade and stromal Foxp3 Kaplan–Meier estimates for cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival by (A and B) Dworak grade and (C and D) stromal Foxp3+ cell density. Groups compared using the log-rank test. *Test for trend.
Recurrence-free survival according to stromal Foxp3+ cell density and clinicopathological factors
| High | 1.00 | |||||
| Low | 0.46 | 0.23–0.92 | 0.0288 | |||
| 1–4 | 0.55 | 0.37–0.82 | 0.0031 | 0.61 | 0.39–0.95 | 0.0300 |
| <65 | 1.00 | |||||
| ⩾65 | 0.83 | 0.43–1.59 | 0.5669 | |||
| Male | 1.00 | |||||
| Female | 0.68 | 0.31–1.50 | 0.3414 | |||
| <7 cm | 1.00 | |||||
| ⩾7 cm | 0.81 | 0.42–1.56 | 0.5329 | |||
| cT4 | 1.00 | 0.0554 | ||||
| cT3 | 0.39 | 0.17–0.90 | ||||
| cT2 | 0.18 | 0.02–1.44 | ||||
| cN1–2 | 1.00 | |||||
| cN0 | 1.35 | 0.65–2.83 | 0.4226 | |||
| cM1–2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| cM0 | 0.20 | 0.09–0.44 | <0.0001 | 0.28 | 0.12–0.66 | 0.0038 |
| ⩽7 Weeks | 1.00 | |||||
| >7 Weeks | 0.92 | 0.48–1.77 | 0.8101 | |||
| ypT3–4 | 1.00 | 0.0006 | ||||
| ypTis/ypT1/ypT2 | 0.26 | 0.11–0.64 | ||||
| ypT0 | 0.18 | 0.06–0.60 | ||||
| ypN1–2 | 1.00 | |||||
| ypN0 | 0.45 | 0.23–0.87 | 0.0181 | |||
| R1–2 | 1.00 | |||||
| R0 | 0.21 | 0.07–0.60 | 0.0035 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | |||||
| No | 1.62 | 0.39–6.73 | 0.5091 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| No | 0.28 | 0.14–0.57 | 0.0004 | 0.41 | 0.19–0.90 | 0.0252 |
| Yes | 1.00 | |||||
| No | 0.25 | 0.10–0.61 | 0.0021 | |||
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CRT=chemoradiotherapy; Foxp3=forkhead box P3; HR=hazard ratio; Tis=carcinoma in situ.
Variables included in the multivariate analysis: stromal Foxp3, Dworak, cT, cM, ypT, ypN, R status, perineural invasion and extramural venous invasion.
Trend analysis.