| Literature DB >> 26644342 |
Abstract
Calcium (Ca) and the toxic heavy metal cadmium (Cd) are antagonistic ions competing for uptake in plants when they co-occur in soil solutions, and high Ca concentrations can reduce the uptake of Cd in plants. However, less is known about the effects of low Ca bioavailability on Cd uptake and translocation in plants. We hypothesized that low Ca availability would enhance Cd uptake and translocation in Sesbania sesban, a fast-growing shrub potentially useful for Cd removal from contaminated soils, and Brassica juncea, a well-known Cd-hyperaccumulator. The two species were grown under controlled conditions for 21 days in hydroponic nutrient solutions with either 0.2 or 2 mM Ca and 0 or 50 µM Cd in a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design. Both species had a lower relative growth rate, final root length and shoot and root biomasses at 50 µM Cd compared with growth without Cd. The negative effects of Cd on both species were exacerbated at low Ca availability. Brassica juncea had higher root Cd concentrations than S. sesban, but the shoot Cd concentrations did not differ between the two species. The low Ca concentration enhanced the uptake of Cd in the roots of both species, but Cd translocation to the shoots was low, especially at 0.2 mM Ca. We conclude that the low Ca concentration enhanced the uptake of Cd into roots of S. sesban and B. juncea and increased the phytotoxicity of Cd. The translocation of Cd to the shoots of the two species was, however, lower at 0.2 mM than at 2 mM Ca, implying that Cd removal from polluted soil cannot simply be increased by adjusting ion concentrations. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica juncea; Sesbania sesban; cadmium toxicity; calcium; heavy metal; ion antagonists; phytoextraction; phytoremediation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26644342 PMCID: PMC4705350 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
F-ratios from general linear model analyses and two-way ANOVAs showing the effects of species (B. juncea vs. S. sesban), Ca concentration of the growth medium (0.2 vs. 2 mM Ca) and Cd concentration of the growth medium (0 vs. 50 µM Cd) and their interactions on final shoot and root dry mass (DM), RGR, final root length, Ca and Cd concentrations in shoots and roots and the TF in the two plant species. df, degrees of freedom. Significance level (in bold): *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
| Parameter | Main factors | Interactions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species (df = 1) | Ca (df = 1) | Cd (df = 1) | Spec × Ca (df = 1) | Spec × Cd (df = 1) | Ca × Cd (df = 1) | Spec × Ca × Cd (df = 1) | |
| Final shoot DM | 0.5 | 3.7 | 3.3 | ||||
| Final root DM | 1.1 | 3.5 | |||||
| RGR | 1.2 | 3.5 | |||||
| Final root length | 2.4 | 2.3 | |||||
| Cashoot | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.0 | |||
| Caroot | 1.1 | ||||||
| Cdshoot | 1.7 | 1.5 | – | 2.5 | – | – | – |
| Cdroot | – | 5.4 | – | – | – | ||
| TF | – | – | – | – | |||
Figure 1.Mean (±1 SE) final dry mass of shoots (A), roots (B) and RGR (C) of B. juncea (Bj) and S. sesban (Ss) during 21 days of hydroponic growth in different treatment combinations of Ca (0.2 and 2 mM Ca) and Cd (0 µM, −Cd and 50 µM, +Cd). Different letters within the same panel indicate significant differences between the treatments.
Figure 2.Root length (mean ± 1 SE) of B. juncea (A) and S. sesban (B), hydroponically grown in different treatment combinations of Ca (0.2 and 2 mM Ca) and Cd (0 µM, −Cd and 50 µM, +Cd). Arrows indicate the start of the Cd treatments. Different letters on the final root length within the same panel indicate significant differences between the treatments.
Calcium and Cd concentrations (mean ± 1 SE) in tissues of B. juncea (Bj) and S. sesban (Ss) after 21 days of growth in different treatment combinations of 0.2 and 2 mM Ca, and 0 µM (−Cd) and 50 µM (+Cd) Cd, respectively. Different letters within the same column indicate significant differences between the treatments. DM, dry mass.
| Treatment | Species | Ca shoot (mg g−1 DM) | Ca root (mg g−1 DM) | Cd shoot (mg g−1 DM) | Cd root (mg g−1 DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 mM Ca –Cd | 33.6 ± 1.6a | 7.2 ± 0.4a | – | – | |
| 15.5 ± 0.6b | 3.3 ± 0.3c | – | – | ||
| 0.2 mM Ca −Cd | 8.9 ± 0.1c | 2.5 ± 0.1cd | – | – | |
| 5.7 ± 0.4d | 1.7 ± 0.1d | – | – | ||
| 2 mM Ca +Cd | 43.3 ± 1.1a | 7.2 ± 0.2a | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 3.7 ± 0.2b | |
| 18.4 ± 0.2b | 5.3 ± 0.2b | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.2c | ||
| 0.2 mM Ca +Cd | 14.4 ± 3.0bc | 3.5 ± 0.2c | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 7.0 ± 0.3a | |
| 7.4 ± 0.0cd | 5.5 ± 0.0ab | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 4.1 ± 0.0b |