OBJECTIVES: Diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is challenging, and point-of-care tests are needed. Stroop EncephalApp has been validated for MHE diagnosis in single-center studies. The objective of the study was to validate EncephalApp for MHE diagnosis in a multicenter study. METHODS: Outpatient cirrhotics (with/without prior overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE)) and controls from three sites (Virginia (VA), Ohio (OH), and Arkansas (AR)) underwent EncephalApp and two gold standards, psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) and inhibitory control test (ICT). Age-/gender-/education-adjusted values for EncephalApp based on direct norms, and based on ICT and PHES, were defined. Patients were followed, and EncephalApp cutoff points were used to determine OHE prediction. These cutoff points were then used in a separate VA-based validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 437 cirrhotics (230 VA, 107 OH, 100 AR, 36% OHE, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score 11) and 308 controls (103 VA, 100 OH, 105 AR) were included. Using adjusted variables, MHE was present using EncephalApp based on norms in 51%, EncephalApp based on PHES in 37% (sensitivity 80%), and EncephalApp based on ICT in 54% of patients (sensitivity 70%). There was modest/good agreement between sites on EncephalApp MHE diagnosis using the three methods. OHE developed in 13% of patients, which was predicted by EncephalApp independent of the MELD score. In the validation cohort of 121 VA cirrhotics, EncephalApp directly and based on gold standards remained consistent for MHE diagnosis with >70% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study, EncephalApp, using adjusted population norms or in the context of existing gold standard tests, had good sensitivity for MHE diagnosis and predictive capability for OHE development.
OBJECTIVES: Diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is challenging, and point-of-care tests are needed. Stroop EncephalApp has been validated for MHE diagnosis in single-center studies. The objective of the study was to validate EncephalApp for MHE diagnosis in a multicenter study. METHODS:Outpatient cirrhotics (with/without prior overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE)) and controls from three sites (Virginia (VA), Ohio (OH), and Arkansas (AR)) underwent EncephalApp and two gold standards, psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) and inhibitory control test (ICT). Age-/gender-/education-adjusted values for EncephalApp based on direct norms, and based on ICT and PHES, were defined. Patients were followed, and EncephalApp cutoff points were used to determine OHE prediction. These cutoff points were then used in a separate VA-based validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 437 cirrhotics (230 VA, 107 OH, 100 AR, 36% OHE, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score 11) and 308 controls (103 VA, 100 OH, 105 AR) were included. Using adjusted variables, MHE was present using EncephalApp based on norms in 51%, EncephalApp based on PHES in 37% (sensitivity 80%), and EncephalApp based on ICT in 54% of patients (sensitivity 70%). There was modest/good agreement between sites on EncephalApp MHE diagnosis using the three methods. OHE developed in 13% of patients, which was predicted by EncephalApp independent of the MELD score. In the validation cohort of 121 VA cirrhotics, EncephalApp directly and based on gold standards remained consistent for MHE diagnosis with >70% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study, EncephalApp, using adjusted population norms or in the context of existing gold standard tests, had good sensitivity for MHE diagnosis and predictive capability for OHE development.
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Muhammad Hafeezullah; Jose Franco; Rajiv R Varma; Raymond G Hoffmann; Joshua F Knox; Darrell Hischke; Thomas A Hammeke; Steven D Pinkerton; Kia Saeian Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Hendrik Vilstrup; Piero Amodio; Jasmohan Bajaj; Juan Cordoba; Peter Ferenci; Kevin D Mullen; Karin Weissenborn; Philip Wong Journal: Hepatology Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: P Amodio; F Del Piccolo; P Marchetti; P Angeli; R Iemmolo; L Caregaro; C Merkel; G Gerunda; A Gatta Journal: Hepatology Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: J S Bajaj; J Cordoba; K D Mullen; P Amodio; D L Shawcross; R F Butterworth; M Y Morgan Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Peter Ferenci; Alan Lockwood; Kevin Mullen; Ralph Tarter; Karin Weissenborn; Andres T Blei Journal: Hepatology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Thomas K Burroughs; James B Wade; Michael S Ellwood; Andrew Fagan; Douglas M Heuman; Michael Fuchs; Jasmohan S Bajaj Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Payam Matin; Melanie B White; Andrew Fagan; Janina Golob Deeb; Chathur Acharya; Swati S Dalmet; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Patrick M Gillevet; Sinem E Sahingur Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Andrew Fagan; Douglas Heuman; HoChong Gilles; Edith A Gavis; Michael Fuchs; Javier Gonzalez-Maeso; Shahzor Nizam; Patrick M Gillevet; James B Wade Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Melanie B White; Ariel B Unser; Dinesh Ganapathy; Andrew Fagan; Edith A Gavis; Richard K Sterling; Douglas M Heuman; Scott Matherly; Puneet Puri; Arun J Sanyal; Velimir Luketic; Michael Fuchs; Muhammad S Siddiqui; R Todd Stravitz; Binu John; Leroy R Thacker; James B Wade Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2016-06-25 Impact factor: 3.584