BACKGROUND: The psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) is a battery of neuropsychological tests used in the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE). AIM: The aim of this study was to construct and validate a dataset of normal values for the PHES. METHODS: Volunteers and patients with cirrhosis with and without low-grade overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) were enrolled. All subjects completed the PHES battery, and possible modifying factors were assessed. Formulas to predict expected scores in cirrhotics were constructed, and MHE was diagnosed whenever a deviation of <-4 SDs occurred across the five tests. RESULTS: Among the 743 volunteers, age and years of education influenced the scores of all tests. Eighty-four patients with cirrhosis lacked evidence of OHE, whereas 20 had OHE: median PHES were -1 [0 to -3] and -9 [-6.5 to -11.8] (P < 0.001), respectively. Thirteen of the 84 patients (15%) with cirrhosis but without OHE had MHE. Patients with MHE were older and less educated than those without MHE (61 ± 8 and 52 ± 10 years old, P = 0.003; 7 ± 4 and 12 ± 5 years education, P = 0.002), whereas liver function was not different (MELD, 8 ± 5 and 8 ± 5). A very strong correlation between these norms and those derived from Spain was observed (r = 0.964, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PHES performance was mostly influenced by age and education, and expected results in cirrhotics need to be adjusted for these factors. Our validation of Mexican norms for PHES (PHES-Mex) establishes a practical method for assessing MHE and contributes to international attempts to standardize diagnostic protocols for MHE.
BACKGROUND: The psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) is a battery of neuropsychological tests used in the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE). AIM: The aim of this study was to construct and validate a dataset of normal values for the PHES. METHODS: Volunteers and patients with cirrhosis with and without low-grade overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) were enrolled. All subjects completed the PHES battery, and possible modifying factors were assessed. Formulas to predict expected scores in cirrhotics were constructed, and MHE was diagnosed whenever a deviation of <-4 SDs occurred across the five tests. RESULTS: Among the 743 volunteers, age and years of education influenced the scores of all tests. Eighty-four patients with cirrhosis lacked evidence of OHE, whereas 20 had OHE: median PHES were -1 [0 to -3] and -9 [-6.5 to -11.8] (P < 0.001), respectively. Thirteen of the 84 patients (15%) with cirrhosis but without OHE had MHE. Patients with MHE were older and less educated than those without MHE (61 ± 8 and 52 ± 10 years old, P = 0.003; 7 ± 4 and 12 ± 5 years education, P = 0.002), whereas liver function was not different (MELD, 8 ± 5 and 8 ± 5). A very strong correlation between these norms and those derived from Spain was observed (r = 0.964, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:PHES performance was mostly influenced by age and education, and expected results in cirrhotics need to be adjusted for these factors. Our validation of Mexican norms for PHES (PHES-Mex) establishes a practical method for assessing MHE and contributes to international attempts to standardize diagnostic protocols for MHE.
Authors: Manuel Romero Gómez; Juan Córdoba; Rodrigo Jover; Juan del Olmo; Ana Fernández; Montse Flavià; Luis Compañy; María José Poveda; Vicente Felipo Journal: Med Clin (Barc) Date: 2006-07-15 Impact factor: 1.725
Authors: P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Peter Ferenci; Alan Lockwood; Kevin Mullen; Ralph Tarter; Karin Weissenborn; Andres T Blei Journal: Hepatology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Christopher Randolph; Robin Hilsabeck; Ainobu Kato; Parampreet Kharbanda; Yu-Yuan Li; Daniela Mapelli; Lisa D Ravdin; Manuel Romero-Gomez; Andrea Stracciari; Karin Weissenborn Journal: Liver Int Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Thomas K Burroughs; James B Wade; Michael S Ellwood; Andrew Fagan; Douglas M Heuman; Michael Fuchs; Jasmohan S Bajaj Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Andrés Duarte-Rojo; Astrid Ruiz-Margáin; Ricardo U Macias-Rodriguez; Francisco Javier Cubero; José Estradas-Trujillo; Rosa Ma Muñoz-Fuentes; Aldo Torre Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Gang Zheng; Hanzhang Lu; Wenkui Yu; Song Luo; Ya Liu; Wei Liu; Hui Liu; Long Wu; Lijuan Zheng; Xiang Kong; Long Jiang Zhang; Guang Ming Lu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marsha Y Morgan; Piero Amodio; Nicola A Cook; Clive D Jackson; Gerald Kircheis; Mette M Lauridsen; Sara Montagnese; Sami Schiff; Karin Weissenborn Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 3.584