Literature DB >> 26643385

In-vivo T2-relaxation times of asymptomatic cervical intervertebral discs.

Sean J Driscoll1, Weiye Zhong1,2, Martin Torriani3, Haiqing Mao1, Kirkham B Wood4, Thomas D Cha4, Guoan Li5.   

Abstract

Limited research exists on T2-mapping techniques for cervical intervertebral discs and its potential clinical utility. The objective of this research was to investigate the in-vivo T2-relaxation times of cervical discs, including C2-C3 through C7-T1. Ten asymptomatic subjects were imaged using a 3.0 T MR scanner and a sagittal multi-slice multi-echo sequence. Using the mid-sagittal image, intervertebral discs were divided into five regions-of-interest (ROIs), centered along the mid-line of the disc. Average T2 relaxation time values were calculated for each ROI using a mono-exponential fit. Differences in T2 values between disc levels and across ROIs of the same disc were examined. For a given ROI, the results showed a trend of increasing relaxation times moving down the spinal column, particularly in the middle regions (ROIs 2, 3 and 4). The C6-C7 and C7-T1 discs had significantly greater T2 values compared to superior discs (discs between C2 and C6). The results also showed spatial homogeneity of T2 values in the C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6 discs, while C2-C3, C6-C7, and C7-T1 showed significant differences between ROIs. The findings indicate there may be inherent differences in T2-relaxation time properties between different cervical discs. Clinical evaluations utilizing T2-mapping techniques in the cervical spine may need to be level-dependent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine; In vivo; Intervertebral disc; Magnetic resonance imaging; T2 mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26643385      PMCID: PMC4718756          DOI: 10.1007/s00256-015-2307-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  48 in total

1.  The ligaments and annulus fibrosus of human adult cervical intervertebral discs.

Authors:  S Mercer; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Diagnostic criteria and treatment of discogenic pain: a systematic review of recent clinical literature.

Authors:  Khalid M Malik; Steven P Cohen; David R Walega; Honorio T Benzon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers.

Authors:  K P Schellhas; M D Smith; C R Gundry; S R Pollei
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Intervertebral disc changes with aging of human cervical vertebra. From the neonate to the eighties.

Authors:  J Oda; H Tanaka; N Tsuzuki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: technical and clinical observations.

Authors:  M T Modic; M A Weinstein; W Pavlicek; F Boumphrey; D Starnes; P M Duchesneau
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A method for quantifying intervertebral disc signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Masaki Nagashima; Hitoshi Abe; Kenji Amaya; Hideo Matsumoto; Hisashi Yanaihara; Yuji Nishiwaki; Yoshiaki Toyama; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Elastic, permeability and swelling properties of human intervertebral disc tissues: A benchmark for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Daniel H Cortes; Nathan T Jacobs; John F DeLucca; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990.

Authors:  K Radhakrishnan; W J Litchy; W M O'Fallon; L T Kurland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Disc degeneration assessed by quantitative T2* (T2 star) correlated with functional lumbar mechanics.

Authors:  Arin M Ellingson; Hitesh Mehta; David W Polly; Jutta Ellermann; David J Nuckley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Nociceptive tolerance is improved by bradykinin receptor B1 antagonism and joint morphology is protected by both endothelin type A and bradykinin receptor B1 antagonism in a surgical model of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gabriel N Kaufman; Charlotte Zaouter; Barthélémy Valteau; Pierre Sirois; Florina Moldovan
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Skeletal Radiology: the year in review 2016.

Authors:  Daniel I Rosenthal; Mark Kransdorf; Gunnar Astrom
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  3-T MRI mapping is a valid in vivo method of quantitatively evaluating the anterior cruciate ligament: rater reliability and comparison across age.

Authors:  Adam W Anz; Jos Edison; Thomas S Denney; Eric A Branch; Christopher R Walz; Kenny V Brock; Michael D Goodlett
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Investigation of Alterations in the Lumbar Disc Biomechanics at the Adjacent Segments After Spinal Fusion Using a Combined In Vivo and In Silico Approach.

Authors:  Chaochao Zhou; Thomas Cha; Wei Wang; Runsheng Guo; Guoan Li
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.934

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.