| Literature DB >> 26643097 |
Abstract
Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) can have severe consequences and their incidence is high. In recent years, PPCs have been the subject of numerous studies and articles, which have provided a great deal of information that is beneficial but that can cause confusion on a practical level. This review focusses on three main points: (1) the definitions of PPCs, which are heterogeneous and often vary from one report to another, despite emerging consensus; (2) the risk as reflected in the pool of PPC predictors, with each study identifying some but leaving us with a myriad of combinations; and (3) the many PPC prediction scores proposed, each with its strengths and limitations. We attempt to clarify the practical and research implications of the current situation.Entities:
Keywords: cohort studies; lung diseases; post-operative complications; predictive value of tests; prospective studies; quality control; respiratory tract infections; risk assessment; risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26643097 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ISSN: 1521-6896